12 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1914–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Oerter v. Zieglergreen2 sentences1994In 1910, this state adopted the Massachusetts rule in Oerter v. Ziegler, 59 Wash. 421 , 109 P. 1058 (1910), and subsequently reaffirmed it in Schedler v. Wagner, 37 Wn.2d 612 , 225 P.2d 213 , 230 P.2d 600 , 26 A.L.R.2d 604 (1950). 1994In 1910, this state adopted the Massachusetts rule in Oerter v. Ziegler, 59 Wash. 421 , 109 P. 1058 (1910), and subsequently reaffirmed it in Schedler v. Wagner, 37 Wn.2d 612 , 225 P.2d 213 , 230 P.2d 600 , 26 A.L.R.2d 604 (1950). | 2 | 6 |
Schedler v. Wagnergreen2 sentences1994In 1910, this state adopted the Massachusetts rule in Oerter v. Ziegler, 59 Wash. 421 , 109 P. 1058 (1910), and subsequently reaffirmed it in Schedler v. Wagner, 37 Wn.2d 612 , 225 P.2d 213 , 230 P.2d 600 , 26 A.L.R.2d 604 (1950). 1994In 1910, this state adopted the Massachusetts rule in Oerter v. Ziegler, 59 Wash. 421 , 109 P. 1058 (1910), and subsequently reaffirmed it in Schedler v. Wagner, 37 Wn.2d 612 , 225 P.2d 213 , 230 P.2d 600 , 26 A.L.R.2d 604 (1950). | 2 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Woods v. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co.
green
2 sentences2001The Massachusetts rule, otherwise known as the “natural accumulation rule,” stems from the case of Woods v. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co., 134 Mass. 357 (1883). 2001The Massachusetts rule, otherwise known as the “natural accumulation rule,” stems from the case of Woods v. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co., 134 Mass. 357 (1883). | 7 | 1975–2001 |
Geise v. Lee
green
2 sentences1994This approach has rapidly replaced the Massachusetts rule and is representative of the modern trend which has been adopted by a majority of jurisdictions. ... 84 Wn.2d at 868-69 . 1994This approach has rapidly replaced the Massachusetts rule and is representative of the modern trend which has been adopted by a majority of jurisdictions. ... 84 Wn.2d at 868-69 . | 4 | 1994–1996 |
Reardon v. Shimelman
green
2 sentences2001Contrary to the Massachusetts rule, the Connecticut rule announced in Reardon v. Shimelman, 102 Conn. 383 , 128 A. 705 (1925) placed the burden on the landowner: The duty of the landlord being to exercise reasonable care to prevent the occurrence of defective or dangerous conditions in the common approaches, the fact that a particular danger arose from the fall of snow or the freezing of ice can afford no ground of distinction. 2001Contrary to the Massachusetts rule, the Connecticut rule announced in Reardon v. Shimelman, 102 Conn. 383 , 128 A. 705 (1925) placed the burden on the landowner: The duty of the landlord being to exercise reasonable care to prevent the occurrence of defective or dangerous conditions in the common approaches, the fact that a particular danger arose from the fall of snow or the freezing of ice can afford no ground of distinction. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Schaeffer v. Woodhead
green
2 sentences1996Schaeffer v. Woodhead, 63 Wash.App. 627 , 821 P.2d 75 (1991) (affirming summary judgment for defendant). 1996Schaeffer v. Woodhead, 63 Wash.App. 627 , 821 P.2d 75 (1991) (affirming summary judgment for defendant). | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Iwai v. State
green
2 sentences2001Id. at 90 , 915 P.2d 1089 . 2001Id. at 90 , 915 P.2d 1089 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Karp v. Mills
neutral
2 sentences1974Karp v. Mills, 348 Mass. 768 , 202 N.E.2d 244 (1964); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969). 1974Karp v. Mills, 348 Mass. 768 , 202 N.E.2d 244 (1964); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Lord v. Maryland Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences1974Karp v. Mills, 348 Mass. 768 , 202 N.E.2d 244 (1964); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969). 1974Karp v. Mills, 348 Mass. 768 , 202 N.E.2d 244 (1964); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Strong v. Shefveland
green
2 sentences1974Fuller v. Housing Authority, 108 R.I. 770 , 279 A.2d 438 , 49 A.L.R.3d 382 (1971); *732 Dubreuil v. Dubreuil, 107 N.H. 519 , 229 A.2d 338 (1967); Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N.W.2d 247 (1957). 1974Fuller v. Housing Authority, 108 R.I. 770 , 279 A.2d 438 , 49 A.L.R.3d 382 (1971); *732 Dubreuil v. Dubreuil, 107 N.H. 519 , 229 A.2d 338 (1967); Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N.W.2d 247 (1957). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Kilbury v. McConnell
green
2 sentences1974Karp v. Mills, 348 Mass. 768 , 202 N.E.2d 244 (1964); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969). 1974Karp v. Mills, 348 Mass. 768 , 202 N.E.2d 244 (1964); Kilbury v. McConnell, 246 Ark. 528 , 438 S.W.2d 692 (1969). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Cramer v. Van Parys
green
2 sentences1974Schedler v. Wagner, supra; Oerter v. Ziegler, 59 Wash. 421 , 109 P. 1058 (1910); Cramer v. Van Parys, 7 Wn. 1974Schedler v. Wagner, supra; Oerter v. Ziegler, 59 Wash. 421 , 109 P. 1058 (1910); Cramer v. Van Parys, 7 Wn. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Fuller v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF PROV.
green
2 sentences1974Fuller v. Housing Authority, 108 R.I. 770 , 279 A.2d 438 , 49 A.L.R.3d 382 (1971); *732 Dubreuil v. Dubreuil, 107 N.H. 519 , 229 A.2d 338 (1967); Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N.W.2d 247 (1957). 1974Fuller v. Housing Authority, 108 R.I. 770 , 279 A.2d 438 , 49 A.L.R.3d 382 (1971); *732 Dubreuil v. Dubreuil, 107 N.H. 519 , 229 A.2d 338 (1967); Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N.W.2d 247 (1957). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Dubreuil v. Dubreuil
green
2 sentences1974Fuller v. Housing Authority, 108 R.I. 770 , 279 A.2d 438 , 49 A.L.R.3d 382 (1971); *732 Dubreuil v. Dubreuil, 107 N.H. 519 , 229 A.2d 338 (1967); Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N.W.2d 247 (1957). 1974Fuller v. Housing Authority, 108 R.I. 770 , 279 A.2d 438 , 49 A.L.R.3d 382 (1971); *732 Dubreuil v. Dubreuil, 107 N.H. 519 , 229 A.2d 338 (1967); Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N.W.2d 247 (1957). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Motta v. Mello
green
2 sentences1961The Massachusetts rule is stated in Motta v. Mello, 338 Mass. 170 , 154 N. E. (2d) 364 (1958), as follows: “The crucial testimony is that of the plaintiff admitting (a) that she had been invited to ride by the defendant before she was injured, and (b) that when she was injured she was on her way to get into the automobile. 1961The Massachusetts rule is stated in Motta v. Mello, 338 Mass. 170 , 154 N. E. (2d) 364 (1958), as follows: “The crucial testimony is that of the plaintiff admitting (a) that she had been invited to ride by the defendant before she was injured, and (b) that when she was injured she was on her way to get into the automobile. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Sullivan v. Boston & Albany Railroad
green
2 sentences1943In Gasch v. Rounds, supra, wherein this court definitely expressed such to be the test, we adopted the so-called Massachusetts rule as expounded in Plummer v. Dill, 156 Mass. 426 , 31 N. E. 128 , 32 Am. 1943In Gasch v. Rounds, supra, wherein this court definitely expressed such to be the test, we adopted the so-called Massachusetts rule as expounded in Plummer v. Dill, 156 Mass. 426 , 31 N. E. 128 , 32 Am. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Plummer v. Dill
green
2 sentences1943In Gasch v. Rounds, supra, wherein this court definitely expressed such to be the test, we adopted the so-called Massachusetts rule as expounded in Plummer v. Dill, 156 Mass. 426 , 31 N. E. 128 , 32 Am. 1943In Gasch v. Rounds, supra, wherein this court definitely expressed such to be the test, we adopted the so-called Massachusetts rule as expounded in Plummer v. Dill, 156 Mass. 426 , 31 N. E. 128 , 32 Am. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Holbrook v. Holbrook
neutral
2 sentences1932These rules are discussed at great length in elaborate notes to Holbrook v. Holbrook (74 N. H. 201, 66 Atl. 124 ), 12 L. 1932These rules are discussed at great length in elaborate notes to Holbrook v. Holbrook (74 N. H. 201, 66 Atl. 124 ), 12 L. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Paine v. Woods
green
2 sentences1914Paine v. Woods, 108 Mass. 160 ; Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. Fall River, 147 Mass. 548 , 18 N. E. 465 , 1 L. 1914Paine v. Woods, 108 Mass. 160 ; Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. Fall River, 147 Mass. 548 , 18 N. E. 465 , 1 L. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. City of Fall River
green
2 sentences1914Paine v. Woods, 108 Mass. 160 ; Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. Fall River, 147 Mass. 548 , 18 N. E. 465 , 1 L. 1914Paine v. Woods, 108 Mass. 160 ; Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. Fall River, 147 Mass. 548 , 18 N. E. 465 , 1 L. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Dupee v. Lentine
neutral
2 sentences1914Paine v. Woods, 108 Mass. 160 ; Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. Fall River, 147 Mass. 548 , 18 N. E. 465 , 1 L. 1914Paine v. Woods, 108 Mass. 160 ; Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. Fall River, 147 Mass. 548 , 18 N. E. 465 , 1 L. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.