Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1859–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Croomgreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., State v. Croom, 166 Conn. 226, 230 , 348 A.2d 556 (1974) (‘‘evi- dence of the conduct of a defendant subsequent to the commission of a crime is admissible to show the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the crime . . . [and] is simply an application of the general principle that an individual’s conduct may constitute evidence of his mental state’’). 2014See, e.g., State v. Croom, 166 Conn. 226, 230 , 348 A.2d 556 (1974) (‘‘evi- dence of the conduct of a defendant subsequent to the commission of a crime is admissible to show the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the crime . . . [and] is simply an application of the general principle that an individual’s conduct may constitute evidence of his mental state’’). | 1 | 1 |
Welch v. Phinneygreen2 sentences1962Lyon v. Acker, 33 Conn. 222, 224 ; New England Trust Co. v. McAleer, supra; see Welch v. Phinney, 337 Mass. 594 , 150 N.E.2d 723 . 1962Lyon v. Acker, 33 Conn. 222, 224 ; New England Trust Co. v. McAleer, supra; see Welch v. Phinney, 337 Mass. 594 , 150 N.E.2d 723 . | 1 | 1 |
Hinckley v. City of Danburygreen2 sentences1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . 1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . | 1 | 1 |
Newton v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroadgreen2 sentences1912Co., 72 Conn. 420, 426, 427 , 44 Atl. 813 , is an example of the application of the general rule. 1912Co., 72 Conn. 420, 426, 427 , 44 Atl. 813 , is an example of the application of the general rule. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lowman v. Housing Authority
neutral
1 sentence1993Malvicini v. Stratfield Motor Hotel, Inc., supra, 442; Lowman v. Housing Authority, 150 Conn. 665 , 670 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Housing Authority v. Lustig
green
2 sentences1968This rule was recently reiterated in Seferi v. Ives, 155 Conn. 580, 582 , 236 A.2d 83 , where we quoted from Hous *88 ing Authority v. Lustig, 139 Conn. 73, 76 , 90 A.2d 169 : “In a case . . . where an entire piece of property is taken, the proper measure of damages is the fair market value of the real property. 1968This rule was recently reiterated in Seferi v. Ives, 155 Conn. 580, 582 , 236 A.2d 83 , where we quoted from Hous *88 ing Authority v. Lustig, 139 Conn. 73, 76 , 90 A.2d 169 : “In a case . . . where an entire piece of property is taken, the proper measure of damages is the fair market value of the real property. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Seferi v. Ives
green
2 sentences1968This rule was recently reiterated in Seferi v. Ives, 155 Conn. 580, 582 , 236 A.2d 83 , where we quoted from Hous *88 ing Authority v. Lustig, 139 Conn. 73, 76 , 90 A.2d 169 : “In a case . . . where an entire piece of property is taken, the proper measure of damages is the fair market value of the real property. 1968This rule was recently reiterated in Seferi v. Ives, 155 Conn. 580, 582 , 236 A.2d 83 , where we quoted from Hous *88 ing Authority v. Lustig, 139 Conn. 73, 76 , 90 A.2d 169 : “In a case . . . where an entire piece of property is taken, the proper measure of damages is the fair market value of the real property. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Country Lands, Inc. v. Swinnerton
green
2 sentences1964Country Lands, Inc. v. Swinnerton, 151 Conn. 27, 33 , 193 A.2d 483 . 1964Country Lands, Inc. v. Swinnerton, 151 Conn. 27, 33 , 193 A.2d 483 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feuerring
green
1 sentence1963The language of the agreement to arbitrate of course, must be sufficiently broad so as to permit of the application of the general principle that all issues subsequent to the making of the contract are not for the court but for the arbitrators.” See Matter of Behrens (Feuerring), 296 N.Y. 172, 177 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Batter Building Materials Co. v. Kirschner
green
1 sentence1963To the same effect is the case of Batter Building Materials Co. v. Kirschner, 142 Conn. 1 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Lyon v. Acker
green
1 sentence1962Lyon v. Acker, 33 Conn. 222, 224 ; New England Trust Co. v. McAleer, supra; see Welch v. Phinney, 337 Mass. 594 , 150 N.E.2d 723 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Gustafson v. City of Meriden
green
2 sentences1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . 1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Place v. Town of Sterling
green
2 sentences1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . 1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Porpora v. City of New Haven
green
2 sentences1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . 1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Roth v. MacDonald
green
2 sentences1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . 1947See Hinckley v. Danbury, 81 Conn. 241, 242 , 70 A. 590 ; Place v. Sterling, 86 Conn. 506, 509 , 86 A. 3 ; Gustafson v. Meriden, 103 Conn. 598, 605 , 131 A. 437 ; Porpora v. New Haven, 119 Conn. 476, 480 , 177 A. 531 ; Both v. MacDonald, 124 Conn. 461, 463 , 200 A. 725 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Hickock v. Hoyt
neutral
1 sentence1933Hickock v. Hoyt, 33 Conn. 553 ; 3 Williston, Contracts, § 1473 et seq. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Burr v. Harty
green
2 sentences1926Steinert v. Whitcomb, 84 Conn. 262, 264 , 79 Atl. 724 ; Burr v. Harty, 75 Conn. 127, 129 , 52 Atl. 724 ; Flynn v. West Hartford, 98 Conn. 83, 86 , 118 Atl. 517 ; Bates v. Carroll, 99 Conn. 677 , 122 Atl. 562 . 1926Steinert v. Whitcomb, 84 Conn. 262, 264 , 79 Atl. 724 ; Burr v. Harty, 75 Conn. 127, 129 , 52 Atl. 724 ; Flynn v. West Hartford, 98 Conn. 83, 86 , 118 Atl. 517 ; Bates v. Carroll, 99 Conn. 677 , 122 Atl. 562 . | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Steinert v. Whitcomb
green
1 sentence1926Steinert v. Whitcomb, 84 Conn. 262, 264 , 79 Atl. 724 ; Burr v. Harty, 75 Conn. 127, 129 , 52 Atl. 724 ; Flynn v. West Hartford, 98 Conn. 83, 86 , 118 Atl. 517 ; Bates v. Carroll, 99 Conn. 677 , 122 Atl. 562 . | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Flynn v. Town of West Hartford
green
2 sentences1926Steinert v. Whitcomb, 84 Conn. 262, 264 , 79 Atl. 724 ; Burr v. Harty, 75 Conn. 127, 129 , 52 Atl. 724 ; Flynn v. West Hartford, 98 Conn. 83, 86 , 118 Atl. 517 ; Bates v. Carroll, 99 Conn. 677 , 122 Atl. 562 . 1926Steinert v. Whitcomb, 84 Conn. 262, 264 , 79 Atl. 724 ; Burr v. Harty, 75 Conn. 127, 129 , 52 Atl. 724 ; Flynn v. West Hartford, 98 Conn. 83, 86 , 118 Atl. 517 ; Bates v. Carroll, 99 Conn. 677 , 122 Atl. 562 . | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Bates v. Carroll
green
2 sentences1926Steinert v. Whitcomb, 84 Conn. 262, 264 , 79 Atl. 724 ; Burr v. Harty, 75 Conn. 127, 129 , 52 Atl. 724 ; Flynn v. West Hartford, 98 Conn. 83, 86 , 118 Atl. 517 ; Bates v. Carroll, 99 Conn. 677 , 122 Atl. 562 . 1926Steinert v. Whitcomb, 84 Conn. 262, 264 , 79 Atl. 724 ; Burr v. Harty, 75 Conn. 127, 129 , 52 Atl. 724 ; Flynn v. West Hartford, 98 Conn. 83, 86 , 118 Atl. 517 ; Bates v. Carroll, 99 Conn. 677 , 122 Atl. 562 . | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Bettendorf Axle Co. v. Field
neutral
1 sentence1926Steinert v. Whitcomb, 84 Conn. 262, 264 , 79 Atl. 724 ; Burr v. Harty, 75 Conn. 127, 129 , 52 Atl. 724 ; Flynn v. West Hartford, 98 Conn. 83, 86 , 118 Atl. 517 ; Bates v. Carroll, 99 Conn. 677 , 122 Atl. 562 . | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Truly v. Wanzer
green
1 sentence1859Truly v. Warner, 5 How., 141 , 2 Story Eq. | 1 | 1859–1859 |
Carrington v. Holabird
green
1 sentence1859If, as the appellants claim, that judgment was one by which the decedent was conclusively bound at law, a case was presented for the application of the general rule, cited and approved by Hinman, J., in giving the opinion of this court in the case of Pearce v. Olney, 20 Conn., 554 , that “ equity will interfere to restrain the use of an advantage gained in a court of ordinary jurisdiction, which must necessarily make that court an instrument of injustice, in all cases when such advantage has been gained by the fraud, accident or mistake of the other party.” See also Carrington v. Holabird, 17 | 1 | 1859–1859 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.