10 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1895–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2010However, in State v. Jones, the Court of Appeals noted that “[a] trial judge’s decision whether to accept guilty pleas from defendants who assert their innocence, therefore, is a discretionary one.” 129 Idaho 471, 474 , 926 P.2d 1318, 1321 (Ct.App.1996) (citing Alford, 400 U.S. at 38 n. 11, 91 S.Ct. at 168 n. 11, 27 L.Ed.2d at 172 n. 11). 2010However, in State v. Jones, the Court of Appeals noted that “[a] trial judge’s decision whether to accept guilty pleas from defendants who assert their innocence, therefore, is a discretionary one.” 129 Idaho 471, 474 , 926 P.2d 1318, 1321 (Ct.App.1996) (citing Alford, 400 U.S. at 38 n. 11, 91 S.Ct. at 168 n. 11, 27 L.Ed.2d at 172 n. 11). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wardgreen2 sentences1978As explained in State v. Ward, 98 Idaho 571, 573 , 569 P.2d 916, 918 (1977), the question which remains, in the absence of a specific request, is “whether a defendant has been prejudiced by a prosecutor’s failure to volunteer evidence available to him.” Here again, as in Ward , the State argues adoption of the most lenient standard of prosecutorial accountability established in Agurs, whereas the defense urges adoption of a far more stringent standard. 1 Once again, however, it is unnecessary for us to decide the precise standard of prosecutorial accountability demanded by the Idaho constituti 1978As explained in State v. Ward, 98 Idaho 571, 573 , 569 P.2d 916, 918 (1977), the question which remains, in the absence of a specific request, is “whether a defendant has been prejudiced by a prosecutor’s failure to volunteer evidence available to him.” Here again, as in Ward , the State argues adoption of the most lenient standard of prosecutorial accountability established in Agurs, whereas the defense urges adoption of a far more stringent standard. 1 Once again, however, it is unnecessary for us to decide the precise standard of prosecutorial accountability demanded by the Idaho constituti | 1 | 1 |
Pepple v. Headrickgreen2 sentences1977The precise rule of construction governing the interpretation of the phrase “otherwise engages in sexual activity as a business” is that of ejusdem generis: “We recognize and have often invoked the rule of construction that, where general words of a statute follow an enumeration of persons or things, such general words will be construed as meaning persons or things of like or similar class or character to those specially enumerated; usually designated the ‘ejusdem generis’ rule.” Pepple v. Headrick, 64 Idaho 132, 141 , 128 P.2d 757, 760 (1942). 1977The precise rule of construction governing the interpretation of the phrase “otherwise engages in sexual activity as a business” is that of ejusdem generis: “We recognize and have often invoked the rule of construction that, where general words of a statute follow an enumeration of persons or things, such general words will be construed as meaning persons or things of like or similar class or character to those specially enumerated; usually designated the ‘ejusdem generis’ rule.” Pepple v. Headrick, 64 Idaho 132, 141 , 128 P.2d 757, 760 (1942). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Goguen
green
2 sentences1986Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 , 94 S.Ct. 1242 , 39 L.Ed.2d 605 (1974). 1986Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 , 94 S.Ct. 1242 , 39 L.Ed.2d 605 (1974). | 4 | 1977–1986 |
Purdy v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho
green
2 sentences2018Co. of Idaho , 138 Idaho 443 , 65 P.3d 184 (2003) which found the precise clause at issue in this case was enforceable. 2018Co. of Idaho , 138 Idaho 443 , 65 P.3d 184 (2003) which found the precise clause at issue in this case was enforceable. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
North Carolina v. Alford
green
1 sentence2010However, in State v. Jones, the Court of Appeals noted that “[a] trial judge’s decision whether to accept guilty pleas from defendants who assert their innocence, therefore, is a discretionary one.” 129 Idaho 471, 474 , 926 P.2d 1318, 1321 (Ct.App.1996) (citing Alford, 400 U.S. at 38 n. 11, 91 S.Ct. at 168 n. 11, 27 L.Ed.2d at 172 n. 11). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Nycum v. Triangle Dairy Co.
green
2 sentences1994In Nycum v. Triangle Dairy Co., 109 Idaho 858 , 712 P.2d 559 (1985), the claimant raised for the first time on appeal the precise claim that Nelson raises here. 1994In Nycum v. Triangle Dairy Co., 109 Idaho 858 , 712 P.2d 559 (1985), the claimant raised for the first time on appeal the precise claim that Nelson raises here. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
cluster 355726
green
2 sentences1980This more just and precise standard was the [net] rental price [of the forms].” 575 F.2d at 1278 . 1980This more just and precise standard was the [net] rental price [of the forms]." 575 F.2d at 1278 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State v. Lopez
green
2 sentences1979There is, however, nothing whatever in the statute to forewarn a person that he is subject to prosecution and conviction for the doing of such innocuous acts, and equally important and noteworthy here, absolutely "[no] reasonably clear guidelines to prevent `arbitrary and discriminating enforcement' and to prescribe a precise standard for the adjudication of guilt." State v. Lopez, supra, 98 Idaho at 590 , 570 P.2d at 268 . 1979There is, however, nothing whatever in the statute to forewarn a person that he is subject to prosecution and conviction for the doing of such innocuous acts, and equally important and noteworthy here, absolutely "[no] reasonably clear guidelines to prevent `arbitrary and discriminating enforcement' and to prescribe a precise standard for the adjudication of guilt." State v. Lopez, supra, 98 Idaho at 590 , 570 P.2d at 268 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State Ex Rel. County of Lyon v. Hallock
neutral
2 sentences1895This position of the court is upheld in the case of State v. Hallock, 20 Nev. 326, 22 Pac. 123 , in which this precise clause in the constitution of Nevada is passed upon by the court, and wherein the same position is taken by the court. 1895This position of the court is upheld in the case of State v. Hallock, 20 Nev. 326, 22 Pac. 123 , in which this precise clause in the constitution of Nevada is passed upon by the court, and wherein the same position is taken by the court. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.