9 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rockefeller v. Hoguegreen2 sentences1996See Rockefeller v. Hogue, 244 Ark. 1029 , 429 S.W.2d 85 (1968). 2. 1996See Rockefeller v. Hogue, 244 Ark. 1029 , 429 S.W.2d 85 (1968). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Canady v. Canadygreen2 sentences1988See, for example, the case of Canady v. Canady, 290 Ark. 551 , 721 S.W.2d 650 (1986), where the court stated: As to the 20-acre tract, it was purchased during the marriage with Connie's premarital funds, but the deed conveyed the property to James and Connie as husband and wife. 1988See, for example, the case of Canady v. Canady, 290 Ark. 551 , 721 S.W.2d 650 (1986), where the court stated: As to the 20-acre tract, it was purchased during the marriage with Connie's premarital funds, but the deed conveyed the property to James and Connie as husband and wife. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cassady v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.
green
2 sentences1973Co., 184 Mass. 156 , 68 N.E. 10 , 63 L.R.A. 285 (1903), is most appropriate, to-wit: “It is true that, where the evidence shows the precise cause of the accident . . . there is, of course no room for the application of the doctrine of presumption. 1973Co., 184 Mass. 156 , 68 N.E. 10 , 63 L.R.A. 285 (1903), is most appropriate, to-wit: “It is true that, where the evidence shows the precise cause of the accident . . . there is, of course no room for the application of the doctrine of presumption. | 2 | 1968–1973 |
Bushong v. Garman Co.
green
2 sentences2002Appellants rely on this court’s holding in Bushong v. Garman Co., 311 Ark. 228 , 843 S.W.2d 807 (1992), to support their argument that had a warning been given by Rogers to AHTD, there is a presumption that such warning would have been heeded. 2002Appellants rely on this court’s holding in Bushong v. Garman Co., 311 Ark. 228 , 843 S.W.2d 807 (1992), to support their argument that had a warning been given by Rogers to AHTD, there is a presumption that such warning would have been heeded. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Thomas v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of Ark.
green
2 sentences1996Co. of Arkansas, 287 Ark. 313 , 698 S.W.2d 508 (1985)], the principal of the school, Phil Hays, testified that the handwritten statement was not available and that the typewritten statement was taken from it, which was normal procedure. 1996Co. of Arkansas, 287 Ark. 313 , 698 S.W.2d 508 (1985)], the principal of the school, Phil Hays, testified that the handwritten statement was not available and that the typewritten statement was taken from it, which was normal procedure. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Klimas v. State
green
2 sentences1984Both Klimas v. State, 259 Ark. 301 , 534 S.W.2d 202 (1976) and McConahay v. State, 257 Ark. 328 , 516 S.W.2d 887 (1974) state that it is the presumption of waiver of counsel from a silent record that is impermissible. 1984Both Klimas v. State, 259 Ark. 301 , 534 S.W.2d 202 (1976) and McConahay v. State, 257 Ark. 328 , 516 S.W.2d 887 (1974) state that it is the presumption of waiver of counsel from a silent record that is impermissible. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
McConahay v. State
green
2 sentences1984Both Klimas v. State, 259 Ark. 301 , 534 S.W.2d 202 (1976) and McConahay v. State, 257 Ark. 328 , 516 S.W.2d 887 (1974) state that it is the presumption of waiver of counsel from a silent record that is impermissible. 1984Both Klimas v. State, 259 Ark. 301 , 534 S.W.2d 202 (1976) and McConahay v. State, 257 Ark. 328 , 516 S.W.2d 887 (1974) state that it is the presumption of waiver of counsel from a silent record that is impermissible. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Roberts
green
2 sentences1973Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Roberts, 246 Ark. 1216 , 441 S.W. 2d 808 (1969), Arkansas State Highway Commn. v. Parks, 240 Ark. 719 , 401 S.W. 2d 732 (1966). 1973Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Roberts, 246 Ark. 1216 , 441 S.W. 2d 808 (1969), Arkansas State Highway Commn. v. Parks, 240 Ark. 719 , 401 S.W. 2d 732 (1966). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Ark. State Highway Commission v. Parks
green
2 sentences1973Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Roberts, 246 Ark. 1216 , 441 S.W. 2d 808 (1969), Arkansas State Highway Commn. v. Parks, 240 Ark. 719 , 401 S.W. 2d 732 (1966). 1973Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Roberts, 246 Ark. 1216 , 441 S.W. 2d 808 (1969), Arkansas State Highway Commn. v. Parks, 240 Ark. 719 , 401 S.W. 2d 732 (1966). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Boullioun v. Constantine
green
2 sentences1970Appellant cites Boullioun v. Constantine, 186 Ark. 625 , 54 S. W. 2d 986 (1932). 1970Appellant cites Boullioun v. Constantine, 186 Ark. 625 , 54 S. W. 2d 986 (1932). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.