presumption waiver (South Dakota) · Go Syfert
← South Dakota issues

presumption waiver in South Dakota

6 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1927–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Tomas G. Ervin v. Paul K. Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center Michaelbowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center green
ca8 · 1999
2 sentences

2023In evaluating the merits -27- #29790 of this strategy, the Eighth Circuit concluded that Ervin was not able to “overcome the presumption that defense counsel used a sound trial strategy.” Id. at 914 . [¶53.] From their testimony provided on the initially raised ineffective assistance claims, it is apparent that Smith and Jacobs recognized that Ally’s video interviews contained exculpatory evidence.

2023In evaluating the merits -27- #29790 of this strategy, the Eighth Circuit concluded that Ervin was not able to “overcome the presumption that defense counsel used a sound trial strategy.” Id. at 914 . [¶53.] From their testimony provided on the initially raised ineffective assistance claims, it is apparent that Smith and Jacobs recognized that Ally’s video interviews contained exculpatory evidence.

22023–2023
State v. Holmes green
sd · 1983
2 sentences

1990The trial judge’s position is similar to this Court’s analysis in the recent case, State v. [Timothy J.] Holmes, 338 N.W.2d 104 (S.D.1983) {[Timothy J.] Holmes), where we held that SDCL 23A-22-3 articulated the presumption of innocence, but did not mandate that a presumption instruction be given in every case.

1990The trial judge's position is similar to this Court's analysis in the recent case, State v. [Timothy J.] Holmes, 338 N.W.2d 104 (S.D.1983) ( [Timothy J.] Holmes ), where we held that SDCL 23A-22-3 articulated the presumption of innocence, but did not mandate that a presumption instruction be given in every case.

11990–1990
United States v. David Cochran green
ca9 · 1985
2 sentences

1987In United States v. Cochran, 770 F.2d 850 (9th Cir.1985), the court stated that compliance with the requirements of Rule 23(a), creates a presumption that the waiver is a voluntary, knowing and intelligent one.

1987Id. at 851 .

11987–1987
Cassady v. Old Colony Street Railway Co. green
mass · 1903
2 sentences

1932Co., 184 Mass. 156 , 68 N. E. 10, 63 .

1932Co., 184 Mass. 156 , 68 N. E. 10, 63 .

11932–1932
MacGregor v. Pierce neutral
sd · 1903
1 sentence

1927As far back as the case of MacGregor v. Pierce et al, 17 S. D. 51, 95 N. W. 281 , the principle of waiver of notice of intention is indicated, although in that case the facts did not support a presumption of waiver.

11927–1927

Where else courts name it

TX 159 (1926–2026) MI 135 (1857–2026) CA 90 (1866–2026) MO 51 (1858–2024) IL 46 (1890–2026) OH 44 (1956–2026) IN 43 (1896–2025) NY 39 (1904–2026) WA 32 (1894–2026) FL 30 (1914–2025) NJ 28 (1895–2026) MD 27 (1868–2026) PA 26 (1916–2025) AK 23 (1974–2025) OK 21 (1924–2012) CT 18 (1904–2021) AL 18 (1873–2026) GA 17 (1927–2024) MN 17 (1940–2024) UT 16 (1887–2025) MS 15 (1894–2013) OR 15 (1914–2020) WI 14 (1930–2021) HI 13 (1987–2025) NM 13 (1930–2025) WY 13 (1960–2024) ND 13 (1960–2023) IA 12 (1920–2025) CO 12 (1984–2024) MA 11 (1903–2024) TN 10 (1992–2019) AZ 10 (1970–2026) VA 10 (1903–2024) MT 10 (1896–2025) NE 9 (1906–2025) AR 9 (1968–2002) DC 9 (1986–2024) KY 9 (1922–2016) NV 9 (1926–2017) LA 9 (1965–2021) KS 9 (1979–2024) NC 7 (1900–2016) SD 6 (1927–2023) VT 5 (1974–2011) DE 4 (1911–2016) WV 4 (1951–2025) RI 4 (1951–2025) ME 4 (1848–1973) NH 4 (1926–2007) SC 3 (1930–2016) ID 2 (1967–1980)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check