12 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1920–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lamberto v. Bowngreen2 sentences2025Lamberto v. Bown, 326 N.W.2d 305, 309 (Iowa 1982); see, e.g., Bandstra, 913 N.W.2d at 51–55. 2002See Lamberto, 326 N.W.2d at 309 (there is a presumption the privilege applies if the resisting party is a member of the protected class). | 2 | 2 |
Daniel Lado v. State of Iowagreen1 sentence2025See Lado, 804 N.W.2d at 251–53. | 1 | 1 |
Valerie Bandstra, Anne Bandstra, Ryan Bandstra and Jason Bandstra v. Covenant Reformed Churchgreen1 sentence2025Lamberto v. Bown, 326 N.W.2d 305, 309 (Iowa 1982); see, e.g., Bandstra, 913 N.W.2d at 51–55. | 1 | 1 |
Speckel Ex Rel. Speckel v. Perkinsgreen1 sentence2014See, e.g., Speckel v. Perkins, 364 N.W.2d 890, 893 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985) (“A duty to inquire may be imposed on the person receiving the offer when there are factors that reasonably raise a presumption of error. | 1 | 1 |
Pettes v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Pettes v. State, 418 N.W.2d 53, 56 (Iowa 1988). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Myersgreen2 sentences1980See, e. g., State v. Myers, 258 Iowa 940, 952 , 140 N.W.2d 891, 898 (1966). 1980See, e. g., State v. Myers, 258 Iowa 940, 952 , 140 N.W.2d 891, 898 (1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Prouty
green
1 sentence1984We rejected a similar argument with regard to a presumption instruction in Prouty, 219 N.W.2d at 678 : But the State contends other instructions given, placing the burden of proof on the prosecution at all trial stages, served to dissipate any error inherent in the controverted instruction. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Sandstrom v. Montana
green
2 sentences1979Since this instruction clearly conveys to the jury the notion of permissiveness in the application of this inference, we are not presented with a presumption in violation of Sandstrom v. Montana, — U.S. —, 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979). 1979Since this instruction clearly conveys to the jury the notion of permissiveness in the application of this inference, we are not presented with a presumption in violation of Sandstrom v. Montana, — U.S. —, 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen
green
2 sentences1979Rather, this case is controlled by County Court of Ulster Co., New York v. Allen, — U.S. —, 99 S.Ct. 2213 , 60 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979). 1979Rather, this case is controlled by County Court of Ulster Co., New York v. Allen, — U.S. —, 99 S.Ct. 2213 , 60 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Edwards v. Tracy
green
2 sentences1935Greene (Iowa) 387, at page 390, this court, referring to an attachment proceeding, said: “The proceeding being in derogation of the common law, and of a violent character,’ it should affirmatively appear hy the officer’s return, that the provisions of the statute had been strictly observed, as the jurisdiction of the court over the property depends entirely upon a legal levy. * * * 1 “In proceedings in attachment, the jurisdiction of the court is obtained by special authority, derived from the legislature, and hence the doctrine of presumption, as applicable to courts in the exercise of common 1935Greene (Iowa) 387, at page 390, this court, referring to an attachment proceeding, said: “The proceeding being in derogation of the common law, and of a violent character,’ it should affirmatively appear hy the officer’s return, that the provisions of the statute had been strictly observed, as the jurisdiction of the court over the property depends entirely upon a legal levy. * * * 1 “In proceedings in attachment, the jurisdiction of the court is obtained by special authority, derived from the legislature, and hence the doctrine of presumption, as applicable to courts in the exercise of common | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Curry v. Allen
neutral
2 sentences1935Gurry v. Allen, 55 Iowa 318 , 7 N. W. 635 ; Eads v. Pitkin, 3 G. 1935Gurry v. Allen, 55 Iowa 318 , 7 N. W. 635 ; Eads v. Pitkin, 3 G. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
In Re Receivership American Sav. Bank
green
1 sentence1931Bank of Marengo, 210 Iowa 568 : “Unless the facts warrant it, application of the presumption rule' will not be made to property other than cash in the -bank when its doors were closed. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Long ex rel. Long v. Ottumwa Railway & Light Co.
green
1 sentence1923Co., 162 Iowa 11 ; Johnston v. Delano, 175 Iowa 498 ; Haller v. Quaker Oats Co., 181 Iowa 389 ; Blakesley v. Standard Oil Co., 193 Iowa 315 , and cases cited at page 322. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Johnston v. Delano
green
1 sentence1923Co., 162 Iowa 11 ; Johnston v. Delano, 175 Iowa 498 ; Haller v. Quaker Oats Co., 181 Iowa 389 ; Blakesley v. Standard Oil Co., 193 Iowa 315 , and cases cited at page 322. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Haller v. Quaker Oats Co.
neutral
1 sentence1923Co., 162 Iowa 11 ; Johnston v. Delano, 175 Iowa 498 ; Haller v. Quaker Oats Co., 181 Iowa 389 ; Blakesley v. Standard Oil Co., 193 Iowa 315 , and cases cited at page 322. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Blakesley v. Standard Oil Co.
green
1 sentence1923Co., 162 Iowa 11 ; Johnston v. Delano, 175 Iowa 498 ; Haller v. Quaker Oats Co., 181 Iowa 389 ; Blakesley v. Standard Oil Co., 193 Iowa 315 , and cases cited at page 322. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Swan v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence1920Such presumption should be indulged under the presumption that error must affirmatively appear.” In Swan v. Mitchell, 82 Iowa 307 , the mortgage contained the following proviso: “And it is also expressly stipulated and agreed between the parties hereto that, in the event of any failure to pay said sums of money, or any part thereof, or the interest thereon, when due and payable, or to perform any of the covenants as above provided, then the said second party shall be, and is hereby, authorized by himself or agent, at his option, to take immediate possession of said property, and remove all per | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.