rejection claim (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

rejection claim in Michigan

9 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1878–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diegogreen
scotus · 1981 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016And nothing has been advanced which shows that to be palpably false. [Metromedia, 453 US at 508-509 (WHITE, J.).] Two of the dissenting opinions also implicitly agreed with the plurality’s rejection of the claim that the record was inadequate and agreed that advancing aesthetic interests, enhancing property values, and minimizing traffic hazards related to billboards are legitimate and rational governmental interests.

2016See id. at 552 (STEVENS, J., dissenting); id. at 555, 560-561 (BURGER, C.J., dissenting).

11
Trammel v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1980 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See United States v Lofton, 957 F2d 476, 477 n 1 (CA 7, 1992), relying on Trammel, 445 US at 53 .

11
Gardner v. Van Buren Public Schoolsgreen
mich · 1994 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Contrary to plaintiff’s assertion that the wcac’s decision in this case is somehow a rejection of the rule of law established in Gardner , we find the wcac’s findings *383 and analysis entirely consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Gardner, supra, including those portions of the Gardner decision that require an objective assessment of the relative significance of both occupational and nonoccupational factors affecting disability and specifically prohibit reliance upon the claimant’s own subjective, honest, but mistaken perceptions for purposes of determining whether the events of emp

1996See Gardner, supra, pp 46-47 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Michael Brock green
ca7 · 2013
2 sentences

2015The Seventh Circuit held that the defendant did not have standing to challenge the district court’s finding because he was not the holder of the privilege, explaining, “because the defendant-spouse could not invoke the privilege, he also could not appeal a rejection of the privilege.” Id. at 823 . [Allen, ___ Mich App at ___, slip op at 7 (emphasis added; footnote omitted).] The Allen Court concluded that “because defendant could not invoke [his wife’s] testimonial privilege, he has no standing to appeal the court’s determination that [the wife] did not assert the privilege.

2015The court explained, “because the defendant-spouse could not invoke the privilege, he also could not appeal a rejection of the privilege.” Id.

22015–2015
Department of Consumer & Industry Services v. Greenberg green
michctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2019Further, when rejecting an appellant-optometrist’s argument that the subcommittee’s rejection of the hearing referee’s conclusion that the appellant’s actions warranted no disciplinary sanctions exceeded its permissible standard of review, the Court in Consumer & Indus Servs v Greenberg, 231 Mich App 466, 469-470 ; 586 NW2d 560 (1998), held the following: No section of the Public Health Code conditions the subcommittee’s power to sanction on a prior concurring conclusion by the hearing referee. . . .

2019Further, when rejecting an appellant-optometrist’s argument that the subcommittee’s rejection of the hearing referee’s conclusion that the appellant’s actions warranted no disciplinary sanctions exceeded its permissible standard of review, the Court in Consumer & Indus Servs v Greenberg, 231 Mich App 466, 469-470 ; 586 NW2d 560 (1998), held the following: No section of the Public Health Code conditions the subcommittee’s power to sanction on a prior concurring conclusion by the hearing referee. . . .

12019–2019
Matter of Daggs neutral
mich · 1981
2 sentences

2000Rather, we have stressed that the adb overview function involves “continuity and consistency in discipline imposed.” In re Daggs, 411 Mich 304, 320 ; 307 NW2d 66 (1981).

2000Rather, we have stressed that the adb overview function involves “continuity and consistency in discipline imposed.” In re Daggs, 411 Mich 304, 320 ; 307 NW2d 66 (1981).

12000–2000
People v. White red
mich · 1973
2 sentences

1997Id.

1997Id.

11997–1997
O'Brien v. Ohio Insurance neutral
mich · 1883
2 sentences

1901The case is ruled by O'Brien v. Insurance Co., 52 Mich. 131 ( 17 N. W. 726 ); Young v. Insurance Co., 92 Mich. 71 ( 52 N. W. 454 ).

1901The case is ruled by O'Brien v. Insurance Co., 52 Mich. 131 ( 17 N. W. 726 ); Young v. Insurance Co., 92 Mich. 71 ( 52 N. W. 454 ).

11901–1901
Young v. Ohio Farmers' Insurance green
mich · 1892
1 sentence

1901The case is ruled by O'Brien v. Insurance Co., 52 Mich. 131 ( 17 N. W. 726 ); Young v. Insurance Co., 92 Mich. 71 ( 52 N. W. 454 ).

11901–1901
In re the appeal of Dickinson green
mich · 1852
1 sentence

1878In Dickinson’s Appeal, 2 Mich., 337 , an appeal was taken and bond made by an attorney in his own name from proceedings on the rejection of a claim.

11878–1878

Where else courts name it

TX 186 (1875–2026) CA 103 (1870–2026) NY 79 (1879–2020) LA 59 (1857–2023) PA 33 (1925–2023) WA 25 (1906–2017) NJ 21 (1950–2026) OH 20 (1918–2024) OR 18 (1892–2004) CT 18 (1982–2019) IL 17 (1894–2022) TN 16 (2004–2020) MD 15 (1888–2024) MO 14 (1917–2016) FL 14 (1977–2013) AZ 13 (1925–2013) MA 13 (1831–2024) MS 12 (1884–2022) VA 11 (1950–2014) DC 10 (1979–2022) MI 9 (1878–2019) CO 9 (1977–2025) UT 9 (1923–2023) IN 9 (1891–2020) AL 8 (1847–2008) MT 8 (1920–2002) NM 7 (1936–2014) KY 7 (1964–2000) AK 6 (1977–2010) IA 6 (1971–2020) AR 5 (1974–2007) KS 5 (1924–2021) HI 5 (1961–2022) WV 5 (1914–1990) ID 4 (1925–1974) GA 4 (1885–2024) VI 4 (2011–2023) SD 4 (1906–2010) OK 4 (1915–2020) NV 4 (1955–2021) NE 3 (1896–2016) MN 3 (1883–2008) NC 2 (1989–2004) ME 2 (1861–1994) WY 2 (1987–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check