6 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. University of Alaska, Fairbanksgreen2 sentences2010It asserts that "[alt no point is [Pietro] able to document duration, level, nature, and amounts of exposure." We disagree with UNO-CAL that Pietro's inability to quantify exactly his exposure at work would have been a proper basis for the Board's rejection of his claim. 23 . 172 P.3d at 790 . 24 . 2010See Stephens, 915 P.2d at 627 . 25 . 172 P.3d at 790 . 26 . 123 P.3d 948, 953-54 (Alaska 2005). 27 . | 1 | 1 |
Lindhag v. State, Department of Natural Resourcesgreen1 sentence2010See Stephens, 915 P.2d at 627 . 25 . 172 P.3d at 790 . 26 . 123 P.3d 948, 953-54 (Alaska 2005). 27 . | 1 | 1 |
Stephens v. ITT/Felec Servicesgreen1 sentence2010See Stephens, 915 P.2d at 627 . 25 . 172 P.3d at 790 . 26 . 123 P.3d 948, 953-54 (Alaska 2005). 27 . | 1 | 1 |
Brunke v. Rogers & Bablergreen1 sentence1986In accordance with AS 23.30.110 the Board may issue a new compensation order which terminates, continues, reinstates, increases, or decreases the compensation, or award compensation. [1] The court declares that State v. Dupree, 664 P.2d 562 (Alaska 1983), is being now overruled. 714 P.2d 795 at 800, n. 7 (Alaska, 1986). | 1 | 1 |
Ashe v. Swensongreen2 sentences1982Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. at 444 , 90 S.Ct. at 1194 , 25 L.Ed.2d at 475-76 (footnotes omitted).. 1982Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. at 444 , 90 S.Ct. at 1194 , 25 L.Ed.2d at 475-76 (footnotes omitted).. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hawkes Hospital v. Colley
green
2 sentences1995This tension may not rise to the level of an “unmistakable inconsistency,” 442 N.E.2d at 763 , but it violates Hawkes Hospital’s principle that an estate’s communication to a claimant will not be considered a rejection of a claim when the estate does or says anything from which one might reasonably infer that there has been no final decision and that the claim will be further considered. 1995Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State, Department of Natural Resources v. Dupree
green
1 sentence1986In accordance with AS 23.30.110 the Board may issue a new compensation order which terminates, continues, reinstates, increases, or decreases the compensation, or award compensation. [1] The court declares that State v. Dupree, 664 P.2d 562 (Alaska 1983), is being now overruled. 714 P.2d 795 at 800, n. 7 (Alaska, 1986). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Arnold Lowe v. United States
green
2 sentences1979The rejection of this standard is wise: the officer's undisclosed intent cannot affect the suspect's perceptions, Lowe v. United States, 407 F.2d at 1397 ; United States v. Hall, 421 F.2d at 544 , and this standard offers no guidance to police officers because it makes the officer's own conditional intent the standard for when he or she should give Miranda warnings. 1979The rejection of this standard is wise: the officer’s undisclosed intent cannot affect the suspect’s perceptions, Lowe v. United States, 407 F.2d at 1397 ; United States v. Hall, 421 F.2d at 544 , and this standard offers no guidance to police officers because it makes the officer’s own conditional intent the standard for when he or she should give Miranda warnings. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
United States v. Glenn W. Hall
green
2 sentences1979The rejection of this standard is wise: the officer's undisclosed intent cannot affect the suspect's perceptions, Lowe v. United States, 407 F.2d at 1397 ; United States v. Hall, 421 F.2d at 544 , and this standard offers no guidance to police officers because it makes the officer's own conditional intent the standard for when he or she should give Miranda warnings. 1979The rejection of this standard is wise: the officer’s undisclosed intent cannot affect the suspect’s perceptions, Lowe v. United States, 407 F.2d at 1397 ; United States v. Hall, 421 F.2d at 544 , and this standard offers no guidance to police officers because it makes the officer’s own conditional intent the standard for when he or she should give Miranda warnings. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
McCarthy v. United States
green
2 sentences1977I cannot agree with the majority’s rejection of the rule espoused by the Supreme Court of the United States in McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969). 1977I cannot agree with the majority’s rejection of the rule espoused by the Supreme Court of the United States in McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.