Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1950–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sealfon v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2014Ashe, 379 U.S. at 444 (quoting Sealfon v. United States, 332 U.S. 575, 579 (1948)). 2014Ashe, 379 U.S. at 444 (quoting Sealfon v. United States, 332 U.S. 575, 579 (1948)). | 4 | 4 |
Ashe v. Swensongreen2 sentences2003Although the basis for a court's decision is often hard to prove for the purpose of invoking collateral estoppel in a criminal trial, the United States Supreme Court noted in Ashe that a test which is too "technically restrictive would, of course, simply amount to a rejection of the rule of *510 collateral estoppel in criminal proceedings, at least in every case where the first judgment was based on a general verdict of acquittal." Ashe, 397 U.S. at 444 , 90 S.Ct. at 1194 . 2003Although the basis for a court's decision is often hard to prove for the purpose of invoking collateral estoppel in a criminal trial, the United States Supreme Court noted in Ashe that a test which is too "technically restrictive would, of course, simply amount to a rejection of the rule of *510 collateral estoppel in criminal proceedings, at least in every case where the first judgment was based on a general verdict of acquittal." Ashe, 397 U.S. at 444 , 90 S.Ct. at 1194 . | 2 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howard v. South Baltimore General Hospital
green
2 sentences1959The court observed that its attention had been called to the fact that respected authorities in other jurisdictions had refused to apply the doctrine, and said at page 568: “The same arguments that are now being advanced for the rejection of the doctrine were made, considered and denied in Howard v. South Baltimore General Hospital, 1948, 191 Md. 617 , 62 A. 2d *889 574. 1959The court observed that its attention had been called to the fact that respected authorities *396 in other jurisdictions had refused to apply the doctrine, and said at page 568: "The same arguments that are now being advanced for the rejection of the doctrine were made, considered and denied in Howard v. South Baltimore General Hospital, 1948, 191 Md. 617 , 62 A.2d 574 . | 2 | 1959–1959 |
Department of Game & Inland Fisheries v. Joyce
green
2 sentences1950Department of Game, etc., Fisheries Joyce, 147 Va. 89 , 136 S.E. 651 . 1950Department of Game, etc., Fisheries Joyce, 147 Va. 89 , 136 S.E. 651 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.