9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1891–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Springer v. Stategreen1 sentence2020The other Indiana Supreme Court case relied upon by Shepherd, Springer v. State, 798 N.E.2d 431, 433 (Ind. 2003), did not involve the rejection of an instruction similar to Shepherd’s proposed instruction. | 1 | 1 |
Foresta v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Brackens v. State, 480 N.E.2d 536, 539 (Ind.1985); Foresta v. State, 274 Ind. 658, 660 , 413 N.E.2d 889, 890 (Ind.1980); Monserrate v. State, 265 Ind. 153, 157 , 352 N.E.2d 721, 723 (Ind.1976). 2000See Brackens v. State, 480 N.E.2d 536, 539 (Ind.1985); Foresta v. State, 274 Ind. 658, 660 , 413 N.E.2d 889, 890 (Ind.1980); Monserrate v. State, 265 Ind. 153, 157 , 352 N.E.2d 721, 723 (Ind.1976). | 1 | 1 |
Brackens v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Brackens v. State, 480 N.E.2d 536, 539 (Ind.1985); Foresta v. State, 274 Ind. 658, 660 , 413 N.E.2d 889, 890 (Ind.1980); Monserrate v. State, 265 Ind. 153, 157 , 352 N.E.2d 721, 723 (Ind.1976). 2000See Brackens v. State, 480 N.E.2d 536, 539 (Ind.1985); Foresta v. State, 274 Ind. 658, 660 , 413 N.E.2d 889, 890 (Ind.1980); Monserrate v. State, 265 Ind. 153, 157 , 352 N.E.2d 721, 723 (Ind.1976). | 1 | 1 |
Monserrate v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Brackens v. State, 480 N.E.2d 536, 539 (Ind.1985); Foresta v. State, 274 Ind. 658, 660 , 413 N.E.2d 889, 890 (Ind.1980); Monserrate v. State, 265 Ind. 153, 157 , 352 N.E.2d 721, 723 (Ind.1976). 2000See Brackens v. State, 480 N.E.2d 536, 539 (Ind.1985); Foresta v. State, 274 Ind. 658, 660 , 413 N.E.2d 889, 890 (Ind.1980); Monserrate v. State, 265 Ind. 153, 157 , 352 N.E.2d 721, 723 (Ind.1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lori Barcroft v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2019However, we conclude, following Barcroft , that Payne's arguments are merely requests for this Court to reweigh the evidence on appeal, which we cannot do. 111 N.E.3d at 1002 . [24] In sum, in Barcroft our Supreme Court clarified that Indiana's appellate courts are to review a fact-finder's rejection of a claim of insanity the same way we review any other claim of insufficient evidence to support a fact-finder's determinations. 2019We review only the evidence most favorable to the fact-finder's judgment, and we do not "reweigh evidence, reassess witness credibility, or disturb the factfinder's reasonable inferences." Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Harlan v. State
green
1 sentence1987Harlan v. State (1985), Ind., 479 N.E.2d 569 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Pollard v. State
green
2 sentences1986Preliminary and Final Instructions Appellant offered preliminary and final instructions on the elements of theft, conversion, and receiving stolen property; the court refused these instructions, and appellant urges the rejection as error. *217 Brooks argues that the court "has the duty to preliminarily instruct the jury as to the issues for trial, the burden of proof, the credibility of witnesses, and the manner of weighing the testimony to be received," citing Pollard v. State (1979), 270 Ind. 599, 610 , 388 N.E.2d 496 , 505 and Criminal Rule 8(F). 1986Preliminary and Final Instructions Appellant offered preliminary and final instructions on the elements of theft, conversion, and receiving stolen property; the court refused these instructions, and appellant urges the rejection as error. *217 Brooks argues that the court "has the duty to preliminarily instruct the jury as to the issues for trial, the burden of proof, the credibility of witnesses, and the manner of weighing the testimony to be received," citing Pollard v. State (1979), 270 Ind. 599, 610 , 388 N.E.2d 496 , 505 and Criminal Rule 8(F). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
White v. State
neutral
1 sentence1982White v. State, (1979) Ind., 397 N.E.2d 949 ; Jones v. State, (1978) 267 Ind. 680 , 372 N.E.2d 1182 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences1982White v. State, (1979) Ind., 397 N.E.2d 949 ; Jones v. State, (1978) 267 Ind. 680 , 372 N.E.2d 1182 . 1982White v. State, (1979) Ind., 397 N.E.2d 949 ; Jones v. State, (1978) 267 Ind. 680 , 372 N.E.2d 1182 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Knight v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
green
1 sentence1971Indiana stresses proximity of cause by adding to the rule the condition, “where no mischance, slip or mishap occurs in the doing of the [intentional] act [which produces the resulting injury].” (129 Ind. *220 App. at 271.) Had that condition been a part of the Arizona rule in Knight v. Metropolitan, supra, (the high dive case), there would have been no need for a rejection of the rule since in making the dive “he suffered the mishap of rolling over on his back just before he hit the water,” ( 437 P. 2d at 421 .) 8 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Rhoden v. Smith & Decker Electric Co.
green
1 sentence1946Rhoden v. Smith & Decker Electric Company (1939), 107 Ind. App. 152 , 23 N. E. (2d) 306. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Board of Commissioners v. Wood
green
1 sentence1891Board, etc., v. Wood, 35 Ind. 70 ; Board, etc., v. Ritter, 90 Ind. 362 (368) ; Duncan v. Board, etc., 101 Ind. 403 . | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Board of Commissioners v. Ritter
neutral
1 sentence1891Board, etc., v. Wood, 35 Ind. 70 ; Board, etc., v. Ritter, 90 Ind. 362 (368) ; Duncan v. Board, etc., 101 Ind. 403 . | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Duncan v. Board of Commissioners
neutral
1 sentence1891Board, etc., v. Wood, 35 Ind. 70 ; Board, etc., v. Ritter, 90 Ind. 362 (368) ; Duncan v. Board, etc., 101 Ind. 403 . | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.