Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 1920–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Korellgreen2 sentences1998Korell, 690 P.2d at 996, 1004 . [ 288 Mont. 105 ] ¶80 We observed that the applicable sentencing statutes expressly required the sentencing court to consider whether the defendant suffered from a "mental disease or defect," even where the jury had convicted the defendant. 1998Korell, 690 P.2d at 996, 1004 . ¶80 We observed that the applicable sentencing statutes expressly required the sentencing court to consider whether the defendant suffered from a “mental disease or defect,” even where the jury had convicted the defendant. | 2 | 2 |
State Ex Rel. Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. Shodair Hospitalgreen2 sentences2002Shodair Hospital, 273 Mont. at 160 , 902 P.2d at 24 (citation omitted). ¶27 The hearing officer’s Finding of Fact No. 1 provides: The Appellants each manage 450 to 500 cases. 2002Shodair Hospital, 273 Mont. at 160 , 902 P.2d at 24 (citation omitted). ¶27 The hearing officer’s Finding of Fact No. 1 provides: The Appellants each manage 450 to 500 cases. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brander v. Director, Montana Department of Institutions
green
2 sentences1998Brander v. Director, Dept. of Inst. (1991), 247 Mont. 302, 308 , 806 P.2d 530, 533 . 1998Brander v. Director, Dept. of Inst. (1991), 247 Mont. 302, 308 , 806 P.2d 530, 533 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Vail v. Custer County
green
2 sentences1961Relator’s claim was based on section 84-4176, R.C.M.1947, and the decision of this court in Vail v. Custer County, 132 Mont. 205 , 315 P.2d 993 . 1961Relator’s claim was based on section 84-4176, R.C.M.1947, and the decision of this court in Vail v. Custer County, 132 Mont. 205 , 315 P.2d 993 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
State ex rel. Mitchell v. Holmes
neutral
2 sentences1957Mitchell v. Holmes, 128 Mont. 275 , 274 Pac. (2d) 611 . 1957Mitchell v. Holmes, 128 Mont. 275 , 274 Pac. (2d) 611 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of Chicago
green
2 sentences1927It is equitable and just, therefore, that the share of the other creditors in the assets of the bank should be reduced by enough to pay the interest on the delayed dividends on the $100,000 from the date of the rejection of the claim until such dividends are paid. ' This conclusion is fully sustained by the decision *245 of the supreme court in the ease of Armstrong v. Bank, 133 U. S. 433 , 10 S. Ct. 450 [ 33 L. 1927It is equitable and just, therefore, that the share of the other creditors in the assets of the bank should be reduced by enough to pay the interest on the delayed dividends on the $100,000 from the date of the rejection of the claim until such dividends are paid. ' This conclusion is fully sustained by the decision *245 of the supreme court in the ease of Armstrong v. Bank, 133 U. S. 433 , 10 S. Ct. 450 [ 33 L. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
In re Estate of Swain
green
2 sentences1920Upon the rejection of the claim by the executor, without a demand for further information, or of exhibits or proof of the claim, the plaintiff was entitled to maintain an action for the amount of his claim upon a contract, either express or implied. * * * We do not think the claim presented differs so much from the cause of action sued on, in the absence of demand for more specific information * * * as to constitute a fatal variance.” To the same effect, see Estate of Swain, 67 Cal. 637 , 8 Pac. 497 ; 18 Cyc. 480; Selna v. Selna, 125 Cal. 357 , 73 Am. 1920Upon the rejection of the claim by the executor, without a demand for further information, or of exhibits or proof of the claim, the plaintiff was entitled to maintain an action for the amount of his claim upon a contract, either express or implied. * * * We do not think the claim presented differs so much from the cause of action sued on, in the absence of demand for more specific information * * * as to constitute a fatal variance.” To the same effect, see Estate of Swain, 67 Cal. 637 , 8 Pac. 497 ; 18 Cyc. 480; Selna v. Selna, 125 Cal. 357 , 73 Am. | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Selna v. Selna
green
1 sentence1920Upon the rejection of the claim by the executor, without a demand for further information, or of exhibits or proof of the claim, the plaintiff was entitled to maintain an action for the amount of his claim upon a contract, either express or implied. * * * We do not think the claim presented differs so much from the cause of action sued on, in the absence of demand for more specific information * * * as to constitute a fatal variance.” To the same effect, see Estate of Swain, 67 Cal. 637 , 8 Pac. 497 ; 18 Cyc. 480; Selna v. Selna, 125 Cal. 357 , 73 Am. | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.