Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1900–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cruz v. Kettering Health Networkgreen1 sentence2015Compare Benner v. Walker Ambulance Co., 118 Ohio App.3d 341, 344 , 692 N.E.2d 1053, 1055 (1997), and Cruz v. Kettering Health Network, (No. 24465) 2012-Ohio-24 (Ohio Ct.App., Jan 06, 2012) (unpublished opinion). . | 1 | 1 |
Benner v. Walker Ambulance Co.green2 sentences2015Compare Benner v. Walker Ambulance Co., 118 Ohio App.3d 341, 344 , 692 N.E.2d 1053, 1055 (1997), and Cruz v. Kettering Health Network, (No. 24465) 2012-Ohio-24 (Ohio Ct.App., Jan 06, 2012) (unpublished opinion). . 2015Compare Benner v. Walker Ambulance Co., 118 Ohio App.3d 341, 344 , 692 N.E.2d 1053, 1055 (1997), and Cruz v. Kettering Health Network, (No. 24465) 2012-Ohio-24 (Ohio Ct.App., Jan 06, 2012) (unpublished opinion). . | 1 | 1 |
First National Bank Company Of Clinton, Illinois v. Insurance Company Of North Americagreen1 sentence2012As our Court of Appeals stated in First Nat’l Bank Co. of Clinton v. Insurance Co. of North America, 606 F.2d 760, 766 (7th Cir.1979) (citations omitted): “ ‘In proceedings under rule 56(c) [, Fed.R.Civ.P.], documents and exhibits identified by affidavit may be submitted to support a motion for summary judgment.’ ” 582 F.Supp. at 547 n. 4. | 1 | 1 |
Manchester Sawmills Co. v. A. L. Arundel Co.green2 sentences1995Arundel Co., 197 Ala. 505, 508 , 73 So. 24, 26 (1916). 1995Arundel Co., 197 Ala. 505, 508 , 73 So. 24, 26 (1916). | 1 | 1 |
Schroeder v. Colbert Countygreen1 sentence1900See Schroeder v. Colbert County, 66 Ala. 137 ; Shinbone v. Randolph County, 56 Ala. 183 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Adm'rs. of Mardis v. Smith
neutral
2 sentences1959Adm’r of Mardis v. Smith, 2 Ala. 382 ; Smith & Crawford, Ex’rs v. Huie, Adm’r, 14 Ala. 201, 206 . 1911This is analogous to the defense of the failure to present a claim to an administrator, which, in a court of law, must be specially pleaded .— Adm'r of Mardis v. Smith, 2 Ala. 382 ; Smith & Crawford, Ex’rs, v. Huie, Adm'r, 14 Ala. 201, 206 . | 2 | 1911–1959 |
Smith v. Huie
neutral
2 sentences1959Adm’r of Mardis v. Smith, 2 Ala. 382 ; Smith & Crawford, Ex’rs v. Huie, Adm’r, 14 Ala. 201, 206 . 1911This is analogous to the defense of the failure to present a claim to an administrator, which, in a court of law, must be specially pleaded .— Adm'r of Mardis v. Smith, 2 Ala. 382 ; Smith & Crawford, Ex’rs, v. Huie, Adm'r, 14 Ala. 201, 206 . | 2 | 1911–1959 |
Haupt v. International Harvester Co.
green
2 sentences2012In Haupt v. International Harvester Co., 582 F.Supp. 545 , 547 n. 4 (N.D.Ill.1984), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, reviewing the analogous requirement in the federal rules of civil procedure, explained: “[The] argument [that] none of the exhibits [referred to in Haupt’s affidavit] can be admitted into evidence because they are unsworn and uncertified has no merit, because Haupt’s affidavit itself is sworn to. 2012As our Court of Appeals stated in First Nat’l Bank Co. of Clinton v. Insurance Co. of North America, 606 F.2d 760, 766 (7th Cir.1979) (citations omitted): “ ‘In proceedings under rule 56(c) [, Fed.R.Civ.P.], documents and exhibits identified by affidavit may be submitted to support a motion for summary judgment.’ ” 582 F.Supp. at 547 n. 4. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Maddox
neutral
2 sentences1945Co. v. Maddox, 221 Ala. 292, 294 , 128 So. 383, 385 . 1945Co. v. Maddox, 221 Ala. 292, 294 , 128 So. 383, 385 . | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Roman v. Woolfolk
neutral
1 sentence1901In those cases, it has been uniformly held that generally before the stockholder can maintain an action against the corporation, he must first make demand upon the managing board of officers, to correct the wrongs complained of and meeting with failure or refusal, he must next seek redress through the stockholders, as a body. — Decatur Co. v. Palm, 113 Ala. 531 ; Bridgeport Co. v. Tritsch, 98 Ala. 274 ; Steiner v. Parsons, 103 Ala. 215 ; Roman v. Woolfolk, 98 Ala. 219 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Birmingham Mineral R. R. v. City of Bessemer
neutral
1 sentence1901In those cases, it has been uniformly held that generally before the stockholder can maintain an action against the corporation, he must first make demand upon the managing board of officers, to correct the wrongs complained of and meeting with failure or refusal, he must next seek redress through the stockholders, as a body. — Decatur Co. v. Palm, 113 Ala. 531 ; Bridgeport Co. v. Tritsch, 98 Ala. 274 ; Steiner v. Parsons, 103 Ala. 215 ; Roman v. Woolfolk, 98 Ala. 219 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Steiner v. Parsons
neutral
1 sentence1901In those cases, it has been uniformly held that generally before the stockholder can maintain an action against the corporation, he must first make demand upon the managing board of officers, to correct the wrongs complained of and meeting with failure or refusal, he must next seek redress through the stockholders, as a body. — Decatur Co. v. Palm, 113 Ala. 531 ; Bridgeport Co. v. Tritsch, 98 Ala. 274 ; Steiner v. Parsons, 103 Ala. 215 ; Roman v. Woolfolk, 98 Ala. 219 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Decatur Mineral Land Co. v. Palm
green
1 sentence1901In those cases, it has been uniformly held that generally before the stockholder can maintain an action against the corporation, he must first make demand upon the managing board of officers, to correct the wrongs complained of and meeting with failure or refusal, he must next seek redress through the stockholders, as a body. — Decatur Co. v. Palm, 113 Ala. 531 ; Bridgeport Co. v. Tritsch, 98 Ala. 274 ; Steiner v. Parsons, 103 Ala. 215 ; Roman v. Woolfolk, 98 Ala. 219 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Shinbone v. Randolph County
neutral
1 sentence1900See Schroeder v. Colbert County, 66 Ala. 137 ; Shinbone v. Randolph County, 56 Ala. 183 . | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.