Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2013This Court has long established that “[b]ecause of the similar wording and purpose underlying the state and federal constitutional provisions on this subject, Rhode Island cases have hewed closely to federal double-jeopardy law when applying the analogous clause in the Rhode Island Constitution.” State v. Rodriguez, 822 A.2d 894, 906 (R.I.2003) (citing State v. Grullon, 117 R.I. 682 , 371 A.2d 265 (1977)). 10 The Double Jeopardy Clause protects an accused from being “twice put in jeopardy,” which the United States Supreme Court has viewed as protecting a criminal defendant from multiple trials 2013“This Court long has held that ‘[bjecause of the similar wording and purpose underlying the state and federal constitutional provisions on this subject, Rhode Island cases have hewed closely to federal double-jeopardy law when applying the analogous clause in the Rhode Island Constitution.’ ” State v. Marsich, 10 A.3d 435, 442 (R.I.2010) (quoting State v. Rodriguez, 822 A.2d 894, 906 (R.I.2003)). | 4 | 4 |
State v. Grullongreen2 sentences2013This Court has long established that “[b]ecause of the similar wording and purpose underlying the state and federal constitutional provisions on this subject, Rhode Island cases have hewed closely to federal double-jeopardy law when applying the analogous clause in the Rhode Island Constitution.” State v. Rodriguez, 822 A.2d 894, 906 (R.I.2003) (citing State v. Grullon, 117 R.I. 682 , 371 A.2d 265 (1977)). 10 The Double Jeopardy Clause protects an accused from being “twice put in jeopardy,” which the United States Supreme Court has viewed as protecting a criminal defendant from multiple trials 2013This Court has long established that “[b]ecause of the similar wording and purpose underlying the state and federal constitutional provisions on this subject, Rhode Island cases have hewed closely to federal double-jeopardy law when applying the analogous clause in the Rhode Island Constitution.” State v. Rodriguez, 822 A.2d 894, 906 (R.I.2003) (citing State v. Grullon, 117 R.I. 682 , 371 A.2d 265 (1977)). 10 The Double Jeopardy Clause protects an accused from being “twice put in jeopardy,” which the United States Supreme Court has viewed as protecting a criminal defendant from multiple trials | 2 | 4 |
State v. Marsichgreen2 sentences2013Marsich, 10 A.3d at 442 (citing Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359, 365 , 103 S.Ct. 673 , 74 L.Ed.2d 535 (1983)). 2013“This Court long has held that ‘[bjecause of the similar wording and purpose underlying the state and federal constitutional provisions on this subject, Rhode Island cases have hewed closely to federal double-jeopardy law when applying the analogous clause in the Rhode Island Constitution.’ ” State v. Marsich, 10 A.3d 435, 442 (R.I.2010) (quoting State v. Rodriguez, 822 A.2d 894, 906 (R.I.2003)). | 1 | 2 |
Simmons v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1979In Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S. Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L. 1979In Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S. Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Missouri v. Hunter
green
2 sentences2013Marsich, 10 A.3d at 442 (citing Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359, 365 , 103 S.Ct. 673 , 74 L.Ed.2d 535 (1983)). 2013Marsich, 10 A.3d at 442 (citing Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359, 365 , 103 S.Ct. 673 , 74 L.Ed.2d 535 (1983)). | 3 | 2010–2013 |
Marsh v. . Chickering
green
1 sentence1903As was said by Judge Miller, of the New York Court of Appeals, in Marsh v. Chickering, 101 N. Y. 396, 400 , where a workman was injured by a ladder which he was using, "We have been referred to no adjudicated case which upholds the liability of a party under circumstances of the same character as those presented by the evidence here. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.