Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1944–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Amerco Derivative Litigationgreen2 sentences2016Corp., 931 A.2d 916, 921 (Conn. 2007) ("[W]hen a statute includes no express statute of limitations, we should not simply assume that there is no limitation period Instead, we borrow the most suitable statute of limitations on the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 5 (0) 1947A basis of the nature of the cause of action or of the right sued upon."); cf. In re Amerco Derivative Litig., 127 Nev. 196, 228 , 252 P.3d 681, 703 (2011) (applying the three-year statute of limitations for fraud to an analogous claim for breach of fiduciary duty). 2016Corp., 931 A.2d 916, 921 (Conn. 2007) ("[W]hen a statute includes no express statute of limitations, we should not simply assume that there is no limitation period Instead, we borrow the most suitable statute of limitations on the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 5 (0) 1947A basis of the nature of the cause of action or of the right sued upon."); cf. In re Amerco Derivative Litig., 127 Nev. 196, 228, 252 P.3d 681, 703 (2011) (applying the three-year statute of limitations for fraud to an analogous claim for breach of fiduciary duty). | 2 | 2 |
Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.green2 sentences2016Corp., 931 A.2d 916, 921 (Conn. 2007) ("[W]hen a statute includes no express statute of limitations, we should not simply assume that there is no limitation period Instead, we borrow the most suitable statute of limitations on the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 5 (0) 1947A basis of the nature of the cause of action or of the right sued upon."); cf. In re Amerco Derivative Litig., 127 Nev. 196, 228 , 252 P.3d 681, 703 (2011) (applying the three-year statute of limitations for fraud to an analogous claim for breach of fiduciary duty). 2016Corp., 931 A.2d 916, 921 (Conn. 2007) ("[W]hen a statute includes no express statute of limitations, we should not simply assume that there is no limitation period Instead, we borrow the most suitable statute of limitations on the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 5 (0) 1947A basis of the nature of the cause of action or of the right sued upon."); cf. In re Amerco Derivative Litig., 127 Nev. 196, 228, 252 P.3d 681, 703 (2011) (applying the three-year statute of limitations for fraud to an analogous claim for breach of fiduciary duty). | 2 | 2 |
Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. Doddsgreen2 sentences2016Corp., 931 A.2d 916, 921 (Conn. 2007) ("[W]hen a statute includes no express statute of limitations, we should not simply assume that there is no limitation period Instead, we borrow the most suitable statute of limitations on the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 5 (0) 1947A basis of the nature of the cause of action or of the right sued upon."); cf. In re Amerco Derivative Litig., 127 Nev. 196, 228 , 252 P.3d 681, 703 (2011) (applying the three-year statute of limitations for fraud to an analogous claim for breach of fiduciary duty). 2016Corp., 931 A.2d 916, 921 (Conn. 2007) ("[W]hen a statute includes no express statute of limitations, we should not simply assume that there is no limitation period Instead, we borrow the most suitable statute of limitations on the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 5 (0) 1947A basis of the nature of the cause of action or of the right sued upon."); cf. In re Amerco Derivative Litig., 127 Nev. 196, 228, 252 P.3d 681, 703 (2011) (applying the three-year statute of limitations for fraud to an analogous claim for breach of fiduciary duty). | 1 | 2 |
Pro-Max Corp. v. Feenstragreen2 sentences2022NRS 106.240 extinguishes a lien ten years after the debt secured by the deed of trust becomes "wholly due." This statute does not address an analogous claim involving whether a foreclosure extinguished a deed of trustholder's lien; rather, it "creates a conclusive presumption that a lien on real property is extinguished ten years after the debt becomes due." Pro-Max Corp. v. Feenstra, 117 Nev. 90, 94 , 16 P.3d 1074, 1077 (2001). 2022NRS 106.240 extinguishes a lien ten years after the debt secured by the deed of trust becomes "wholly due." This statute does not address an analogous claim involving whether a foreclosure extinguished a deed of trustholder's lien; rather, it "creates a conclusive presumption that a lien on real property is extinguished ten years after the debt becomes due." Pro-Max Corp. v. Feenstra, 117 Nev. 90, 94 , 16 P.3d 1074, 1077 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
Harmelin v. Michigangreen1 sentence2020Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 994-95 (1991) (addressing an analogous claim and holding that "[s]evere, mandatory penalties may be cruel, but they are not unusual in the constitutional sense" and clarifying that Where can be no serious contention, then, that a sentence which is not otherwise cruel and unusual becomes so simply because it is mandatory). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Franklin v. State
green
2 sentences1982In Franklin v. State, 98 Nev. 266 , 646 P.2d 543 (1982), we held that the Carter decision warrants the same retroactive effect given the analogous rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965). 1982In Franklin v. State, 98 Nev. 266 , 646 P.2d 543 (1982), we held that the Carter decision warrants the same retroactive effect given the analogous rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Griffin v. California
green
1 sentence1982In Franklin v. State, 98 Nev. 266 , 646 P.2d 543 (1982), we held that the Carter decision warrants the same retroactive effect given the analogous rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Robey
green
1 sentence1944Rep. 488 , and State v. Buckaroo Jack, 30 Nev. 325 , 96 P. 497 , for an analogous principle to that involved in State v. Robey, supra. Instruction number 27 states the statutory definition of an assault. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
State v. Buckaroo Jack
neutral
1 sentence1944Rep. 488 , and State v. Buckaroo Jack, 30 Nev. 325 , 96 P. 497 , for an analogous principle to that involved in State v. Robey, supra. Instruction number 27 states the statutory definition of an assault. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.