Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Laroccogreen2 sentences1994It is true that the Utah Supreme Court has “extended the protections afforded by the search and seizure provision of the Utah Constitution beyond that afforded by the analogous clause in the United States Constitution.” State v. Dunn, 850 P.2d 1201 , 1216 n. 11 (Utah 1993); accord State v. Larocco, 794 P.2d 460, 469-71 (Utah 1990). 1993See, e.g., Sims v. Collection Div. of the Utah State Tax Comm’n, 841 P.2d 6 (Utah 1992); State v. Thompson, 810 P.2d 415, 416-18 (Utah 1991); State v. Larocco, 794 P.2d 460, 469-71 (Utah 1990). | 2 | 2 |
Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & Associatesgreen2 sentences2015Geiserman v. MacDonald, 893 F.2d 787, 790-91 (5th Cir.1990); see also 3 James Wa Moore at aL., Moore's Frperar Practice § 16.92[6)(al (3d ed.2014). 6 . 2015Geiserman v. MacDonald, 893 F.2d 787 , 790–91 (5th Cir. 1990); see also 3 JAMES WM. | 1 | 2 |
Argentine Republic v. National Grid PLC.green1 sentence2019See, e.g. , Argentine Republic v. National Grid Plc , 637 F.3d 365 , 368 (D.C. | 1 | 1 |
Evins v. Carvingreen2 sentences2016Indeed, many courts have held that "the two-dismissal rule, as set forth in [rules analogous to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) ], is not a matter within the trial court's discretion." Bee e.g., Evins v. Carvin, 2013 Ark.App. 185 , 426 S.W.3d 549, 556 (2013) (considering the analogous rule of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure and citing Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 20(1) emt. h (1982)); accord Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc., 158 Wash.2d 238 , 103 P.3d 792, 796 (2004). 2016Indeed, many courts have held that "the two-dismissal rule, as set forth in [rules analogous to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) ], is not a matter within the trial court's discretion." Bee e.g., Evins v. Carvin, 2013 Ark.App. 185 , 426 S.W.3d 549, 556 (2013) (considering the analogous rule of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure and citing Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 20(1) emt. h (1982)); accord Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc., 158 Wash.2d 238 , 103 P.3d 792, 796 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Spokane County v. Specialty Auto and Truck Painting, Inc.green1 sentence2016Indeed, many courts have held that "the two-dismissal rule, as set forth in [rules analogous to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) ], is not a matter within the trial court's discretion." Bee e.g., Evins v. Carvin, 2013 Ark.App. 185 , 426 S.W.3d 549, 556 (2013) (considering the analogous rule of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure and citing Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 20(1) emt. h (1982)); accord Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc., 158 Wash.2d 238 , 103 P.3d 792, 796 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Guillen v. Pierce Countygreen2 sentences2016Rather, these courts conclude,. it "applies automatically to unilateral dismissals by the plaintiff and does not provide for court discretion to look into the reasons for the dismissal." Guillen v. Pierce Cownty, 127 Wash.App. 278 , 110 P.3d 1184, 1188 (2005) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (considering the analogous rule of the Washington Superior Court Civil Rules). 2016Rather, these courts conclude,. it "applies automatically to unilateral dismissals by the plaintiff and does not provide for court discretion to look into the reasons for the dismissal." Guillen v. Pierce Cownty, 127 Wash.App. 278 , 110 P.3d 1184, 1188 (2005) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (considering the analogous rule of the Washington Superior Court Civil Rules). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jamesgreen1 sentence2015See State v. James, 819 P.2d 781, 795 (Utah 1991) (“Issues that are fully 5 Federal caselaw has similarly concluded that the rule authorizing courts to sanction a party for the untimely designation of an expert witness under the scheduling order is the analogous rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. | 1 | 1 |
Webster v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NAgreen2 sentences2013Coroles v. Saubey, 2003 UT App 339, ¶ 28 , 79 P.3d 974 ; see also Webster v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, 2012 UT App 321, ¶ 19 , 290 P.3d 930 ("Rule 9 requires that a plaintiff not only allege facts to establish the elements of a fraud claim but also recite [tlhe relevant surrounding facts, such as the identity of the person who made the alleged misrepresentation[ ] and the time and location at which it was uttered." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); cf. DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.1990) (explaining that the particularity requirement of the analogous rule 9 2013Coroles v. Saubey, 2003 UT App 339, ¶ 28 , 79 P.3d 974 ; see also Webster v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, 2012 UT App 321, ¶ 19 , 290 P.3d 930 ("Rule 9 requires that a plaintiff not only allege facts to establish the elements of a fraud claim but also recite [tlhe relevant surrounding facts, such as the identity of the person who made the alleged misrepresentation[ ] and the time and location at which it was uttered." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); cf. DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.1990) (explaining that the particularity requirement of the analogous rule 9 | 1 | 1 |
Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.green1 sentence2013Co., 451 F.3d 1196, 1204 (10th Cir.2006) (emphasis added) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (interpreting the analogous rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), we are not convinced that the trial court's all-or-nothing approach was appropriate. | 1 | 1 |
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & Younggreen1 sentence2013Coroles v. Saubey, 2003 UT App 339, ¶ 28 , 79 P.3d 974 ; see also Webster v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, 2012 UT App 321, ¶ 19 , 290 P.3d 930 ("Rule 9 requires that a plaintiff not only allege facts to establish the elements of a fraud claim but also recite [tlhe relevant surrounding facts, such as the identity of the person who made the alleged misrepresentation[ ] and the time and location at which it was uttered." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); cf. DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.1990) (explaining that the particularity requirement of the analogous rule 9 | 1 | 1 |
Nixdorf v. Hickengreen1 sentence2013With respect to the Shahs' fraud-based claims (fraudulent concealment, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation) against most of the Defendants, we agree with the trial court that the claims do not comply with the particularity requirement. 111 "Fraudulent concealment requires that one with a legal duty or obligation to communicate certain facts remain silent or otherwise act to conceal material facts known to him." Jensen v. IHC Hosps., Inc. (Jensen I), 944 P.2d 327, 333 (Utah 1997); see also Nixdorf v. Hicken, 612 P.2d 348, 354 (Utah 1980) ("The relationship between a doctor and his patient cr | 1 | 1 |
Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.green1 sentence2013With respect to the Shahs' fraud-based claims (fraudulent concealment, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation) against most of the Defendants, we agree with the trial court that the claims do not comply with the particularity requirement. 111 "Fraudulent concealment requires that one with a legal duty or obligation to communicate certain facts remain silent or otherwise act to conceal material facts known to him." Jensen v. IHC Hosps., Inc. (Jensen I), 944 P.2d 327, 333 (Utah 1997); see also Nixdorf v. Hicken, 612 P.2d 348, 354 (Utah 1980) ("The relationship between a doctor and his patient cr | 1 | 1 |
State v. Thompsongreen2 sentences1993See, e.g., Sims v. Collection Div. of the Utah State Tax Comm'n, 841 P.2d 6 (Utah 1992); State v. Thompson, 810 P.2d 415, 416-18 (Utah 1991); State v. Larocco, 794 P.2d 460, 469-71 (Utah 1990). 1993See, e.g., Sims v. Collection Div. of the Utah State Tax Comm’n, 841 P.2d 6 (Utah 1992); State v. Thompson, 810 P.2d 415, 416-18 (Utah 1991); State v. Larocco, 794 P.2d 460, 469-71 (Utah 1990). | 1 | 1 |
Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax Commissiongreen2 sentences1993See, e.g., Sims v. Collection Div. of the Utah State Tax Comm'n, 841 P.2d 6 (Utah 1992); State v. Thompson, 810 P.2d 415, 416-18 (Utah 1991); State v. Larocco, 794 P.2d 460, 469-71 (Utah 1990). 1993See, e.g., Sims v. Collection Div. of the Utah State Tax Comm’n, 841 P.2d 6 (Utah 1992); State v. Thompson, 810 P.2d 415, 416-18 (Utah 1991); State v. Larocco, 794 P.2d 460, 469-71 (Utah 1990). | 1 | 1 |
John Indiviglio v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Eugene Washington, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Correctionsgreen2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ralphs v. McClellan
green
2 sentences2022This is not supported by the plain language of rule 4(f), which currently omits any time limitation. 2 See Ralphs v. McClellan, 2014 UT 36, ¶ 24 , 337 P.3d 230 (noting that rule 4(f) does not include “any time limitation on a motion to reinstate an appeal.”). 2022This is not supported by the plain language of rule 4(f), which currently omits any time limitation. 2 See Ralphs v. McClellan, 2014 UT 36, ¶ 24 , 337 P.3d 230 (noting that rule 4(f) does not include “any time limitation on a motion to reinstate an appeal.”). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Coroles v. Sabey
green
2 sentences2013Coroles v. Saubey, 2003 UT App 339, ¶ 28 , 79 P.3d 974 ; see also Webster v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, 2012 UT App 321, ¶ 19 , 290 P.3d 930 ("Rule 9 requires that a plaintiff not only allege facts to establish the elements of a fraud claim but also recite [tlhe relevant surrounding facts, such as the identity of the person who made the alleged misrepresentation[ ] and the time and location at which it was uttered." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); cf. DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.1990) (explaining that the particularity requirement of the analogous rule 9 2013Coroles v. Saubey, 2003 UT App 339, ¶ 28 , 79 P.3d 974 ; see also Webster v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, 2012 UT App 321, ¶ 19 , 290 P.3d 930 ("Rule 9 requires that a plaintiff not only allege facts to establish the elements of a fraud claim but also recite [tlhe relevant surrounding facts, such as the identity of the person who made the alleged misrepresentation[ ] and the time and location at which it was uttered." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); cf. DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.1990) (explaining that the particularity requirement of the analogous rule 9 | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Hall v. Blackham
green
2 sentences1997The Utah Supreme Court considered an analogous claim in Hall v. Blackham, 18 Utah 2d 164 , 417 P.2d 664 (1966). 1997The Utah Supreme Court considered an analogous claim in Hall v. Blackham, 18 Utah 2d 164 , 417 P.2d 664 (1966). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Dunn
green
1 sentence1994It is true that the Utah Supreme Court has “extended the protections afforded by the search and seizure provision of the Utah Constitution beyond that afforded by the analogous clause in the United States Constitution.” State v. Dunn, 850 P.2d 1201 , 1216 n. 11 (Utah 1993); accord State v. Larocco, 794 P.2d 460, 469-71 (Utah 1990). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Schmerber v. California
green
2 sentences1990Article I, Section 12 of the Utah Constitution provides, in relevant part, that “the accused shall not be compelled to give evidence against himself....” In contrast, the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution includes the statement that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” In Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), the United States Supreme Court held that “the privilege protects an accused only from being compelled to testify against himself, or otherwise provide the State with evidence of a tes 1990Article I, Section 12 of the Utah Constitution provides, in relevant part, that “the accused shall not be compelled to give evidence against himself....” In contrast, the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution includes the statement that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” In Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), the United States Supreme Court held that “the privilege protects an accused only from being compelled to testify against himself, or otherwise provide the State with evidence of a tes | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Wainwright v. Sykes
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp.
neutral
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Engle v. Isaac
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Little v. City of Jackson
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Hernandez v. Elio M. Rossy, Inc.
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Monk v. Blackburn
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Fearance v. Texas
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Swain v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Baldwin v. Piedmont Mfg. Co.
green
2 sentences1983Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of “cause” established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). 1983NOTES [1] Cf. Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 402 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981); Indiviglio v. United States, 612 F.2d 624, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 933 , 100 S.Ct. 1326 , 63 L.Ed.2d 768 (1980), holding that ineffective counsel short of a Sixth Amendment violation does not satisfy the analogous requirement of "cause" established for federal habeas corpus review in Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 , 97 S.Ct. 2947 , 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), and Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.