Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Murray v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1973See Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855, 861 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 981 , 85 S.Ct. 1345 , 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965). 1973See Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855, 861 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 981 , 85 S.Ct. 1345 , 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965). | 2 | 2 |
Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShanegreen2 sentences1973See Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855, 861 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 981 , 85 S.Ct. 1345 , 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965). 1973See Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855, 861 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 981 , 85 S.Ct. 1345 , 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965). | 2 | 2 |
Warren Jobson v. Frank R. Henne, Edward D. Stevenson, Murray Bergman and Michael Semchyshyngreen2 sentences1973We have found no better expression for the reasoning that immunity in a qualified form is applicable than is set forth in Jobson v. Henne, 355 F.2d 129, 133 (2nd Cir. 1966), as follows: “It should be equally clear that both the language and the purpose of the Civil Rights Acts are inconsistent with the application of common law notions of official immunity in all suits brought under these provisions. 1973We have found no better expression for the reasoning that immunity in a qualified form is applicable than is set forth in Jobson v. Henne, 355 F.2d 129, 133 (2nd Cir.1966), as follows: "It should be equally clear that both the language and the purpose of the Civil Rights Acts are inconsistent with the application of common law notions of official immunity in all suits brought under these provisions. | 2 | 2 |
Huber v. Californiagreen2 sentences1973See Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855, 861 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 981 , 85 S.Ct. 1345 , 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965). 1973See Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855, 861 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 981 , 85 S.Ct. 1345 , 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mesa Oil, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America
green
2 sentences2011Id. at 1335 . 2011Id. at 1335 . | 2 | 2011–2011 |
State ex rel. Foy v. Austin Capital Mgmt., Ltd.
green
1 sentence2020Judge Pope’s ruling ultimately led to our Supreme Court’s ruling in Austin II that FATA does not violate ex post facto limitations. 2015-NMSC-025 , ¶ 1. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque
green
2 sentences2019Although a significant amount of time had passed between the adjudication and Father’s appeal, we apply the reasoning and presumption in Dorias and Amanda M., respectively, and address Father’s arguments regarding the adjudication of neglect. {27} Second, although CYFD argues that the law-of-the-case doctrine should apply to foreclose review of the district court’s finding of neglect at the TPR hearing, application of the doctrine is “discretionary and flexible [and] will not be used to uphold a clearly incorrect decision[.]” Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque, 1998-NMSC-031, ¶ 41 , 125 N.M. 721 2019Although a significant amount of time had passed between the adjudication and Father’s appeal, we apply the reasoning and presumption in Dorias and Amanda M., respectively, and address Father’s arguments regarding the adjudication of neglect. {27} Second, although CYFD argues that the law-of-the-case doctrine should apply to foreclose review of the district court’s finding of neglect at the TPR hearing, application of the doctrine is “discretionary and flexible [and] will not be used to uphold a clearly incorrect decision[.]” Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque, 1998-NMSC-031, ¶ 41 , 125 N.M. 721 | 1 | 2019–2019 |
United States v. Giordano
green
2 sentences1991United States v. Giordano, 469 F.2d 522 (4th Cir.1972), rev'd on other grounds, 416 U.S. 505 , 94 S.Ct. 1820 , 40 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974). 1991United States v. Giordano, 469 F.2d 522 (4th Cir.1972), rev'd on other grounds, 416 U.S. 505 , 94 S.Ct. 1820 , 40 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
cluster 306629
green
2 sentences1991United States v. Giordano, 469 F.2d 522 (4th Cir.1972), rev’d on other grounds, 416 U.S. 505 , 94 S.Ct. 1820 , 40 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974). 1991United States v. Giordano, 469 F.2d 522 (4th Cir.1972), rev'd on other grounds, 416 U.S. 505 , 94 S.Ct. 1820 , 40 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
United States v. Focarile
green
2 sentences1991Rather, I would rely on the reasoning and analysis found in United States v. Focarile, 340 F.Supp. 1033 (D.Md.), affd sub nom. 1991Rather, I would rely on the reasoning and analysis found in United States v. Focarile, 340 F. Supp. 1033 (D.Md.), aff'd sub nom. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Brown v. Merlo
green
2 sentences1975The majority rely heavily on the reasoning and analysis of the California court in Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 (1973). 1975The majority rely heavily on the reasoning and analysis of the California court in Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 (1973). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.