Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Clarkson v. Department of Insurance of State of Indianagreen1 sentence2013Baird v. ASA Collections, 910 N.E.2d 780, 786 (Ind.Ct.App.2009); Clarkson v. Dep’t of Ins. of State of Ind., 425 N.E.2d 203, 206 (Ind.Ct.App.1981). | 1 | 1 |
Baird v. ASA COLLECTIONSgreen1 sentence2013Baird v. ASA Collections, 910 N.E.2d 780, 786 (Ind.Ct.App.2009); Clarkson v. Dep’t of Ins. of State of Ind., 425 N.E.2d 203, 206 (Ind.Ct.App.1981). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Lopezgreen2 sentences2004Rule 30(b) motions, like the motions in this case, filed after conviction and sentencing[,] are considered collateral attacks on the final decision." Id. at 812-13 (citations omitted)." The court further noted that placing the burden of attacking the validity of a plea upon the defendant was "particularly applicable" when such challenge arises in the context of sentence enhancement. 2004Rule 30(b) motions, like the motions in this case, filed after conviction and sentencing[,] are considered collateral attacks on the final decision." Id. at 812-18 (citations omitted)." The court further noted that placing the burden of attacking the validity of a plea upon the defendant was "particularly applicable" when such challenge arises in the context of sentence enhancement. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hamilton v. Rathbone
green
2 sentences1960As laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States in Hamilton v. Rathbone (1899), 175 U. S. 414 , 20 Sup. Ct. 155, 44 L. 1960As laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States in Hamilton v. Rathbone (1899), 175 U. S. 414 , 20 Sup. Ct. 155, 44 L. | 2 | 1905–1960 |
Indianapolis Athletic Club, Inc. v. Alco Standard Corp.
green
1 sentence2018The reasoning for that defense is because misuse "is considered an intervening cause that relieves the manufacturer of liability where the intervening act could not have been reasonably foreseen by the manufacturer." Indianapolis Athletic Club, 709 N.E.2d at 1072 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Freeman v. State
green
1 sentence2004That holding invalidated the multiple enhancements relying upon the reasoning and analysis utilized in Freeman v. State, 658 N.E.2d 68 (Ind.1995). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Logal v. Cruse
green
2 sentences1987My personal preference would be to reexamine the reasoning and the rule of Logal v. Cruse (1977) 267 Ind. 83 , 368 N.E.2d 235 , cert. denied (1978), 435 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 . 1987My personal preference would be to reexamine the reasoning and the rule of Logal v. Cruse (1977) 267 Ind. 83 , 368 N.E.2d 235 , cert. denied (1978), 435 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Logal v. Cruse
green
2 sentences1987My personal preference would be to reexamine the reasoning and the rule of Logal v. Cruse (1977) 267 Ind. 83 , 368 N.E.2d 235 , cert. denied (1978), 435 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 . 1987My personal preference would be to reexamine the reasoning and the rule of Logal v. Cruse (1977) 267 Ind. 83 , 368 N.E.2d 235 , cert. denied (1978), 435 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Hawaii v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
green
2 sentences1987My personal preference would be to reexamine the reasoning and the rule of Logal v. Cruse (1977) 267 Ind. 83 , 368 N.E.2d 235 , cert. denied (1978), 435 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 . 1987My personal preference would be to reexamine the reasoning and the rule of Logal v. Cruse (1977) 267 Ind. 83 , 368 N.E.2d 235 , cert. denied (1978), 435 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 1523 , 55 L.Ed.2d 539 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Steenhoven v. College Life Insurance Co. of America
green
1 sentence1986Co. (1984), Ind.App., 458 N.E.2d 661 , rek. den. 460 N.E.2d 973 ; and Woodward Inc. Co. v. White (1982), Ind., 437 N.E.2d 59 ). 1 We find the Crouch court's reasoning and analysis persuasive and adopt it as dispositive of all of the issues raised in the present appeal. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Woodward Insurance, Inc. v. White
green
1 sentence1986Co. (1984), Ind.App., 458 N.E.2d 661 , rek. den. 460 N.E.2d 973 ; and Woodward Inc. Co. v. White (1982), Ind., 437 N.E.2d 59 ). 1 We find the Crouch court's reasoning and analysis persuasive and adopt it as dispositive of all of the issues raised in the present appeal. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Steenhoven v. College Life Insurance Co. of America
green
1 sentence1986Co. (1984), Ind.App., 458 N.E.2d 661 , rek. den. 460 N.E.2d 973 ; and Woodward Inc. Co. v. White (1982), Ind., 437 N.E.2d 59 ). 1 We find the Crouch court's reasoning and analysis persuasive and adopt it as dispositive of all of the issues raised in the present appeal. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Petro v. State
green
2 sentences1971This Court in the case of Petro v. State (1933), 204 Ind. 401 , 184 N. E. 710 , felt it necessary to describe in some detail the reasoning for the rule which we are affirming here today. 1971This Court in the case of Petro v. State (1933), 204 Ind. 401 , 184 N. E. 710 , felt it necessary to describe in some detail the reasoning for the rule which we are affirming here today. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Lime City Building, Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wagner
neutral
1 sentence1903The case at bar is not within the reasoning or rule announced in Lime City, etc., Assn. v. Wagner, 122 Ind. 78 , 17 Am. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
International Building & Loan Ass'n v. Bratton
neutral
1 sentence1903St. 342, and International Bldg., etc., Assn. v. Bratton, 24 Ind. App. 654 . | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.