6 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1982–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Connecticut v. Johnsongreen2 sentences1989Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 84 , 103 S.Ct. 969, 976 , 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983). 1989Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 84 , 103 S.Ct. 969, 976 , 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983). | 1 | 2 |
Hilbish v. Stategreen1 sentence1996Hilbish v. State, 891 P.2d 841, 850 (Alaska App.1995). | 1 | 1 |
Wortham v. Stategreen1 sentence1990Wortham v. State, 689 P.2d 1133, 1143 (Alaska App.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences1982Cf. Thomas v. State, 522 P.2d 528, 531 (Alaska 1974) (failure to properly instruct on essential element of the offense is error but will only require reversal where prejudice is shown). 1982Cf. Thomas v. State, 522 P.2d 528, 531 (Alaska 1974) (failure to properly instruct on essential element of the offense is error but will only require reversal where prejudice is shown). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Whitton v. State
green
1 sentence1986Id. at 314 . 17 Three years later we were presented with a very different double jeopardy issue in Thessen v. State, 508 P.2d 1192 (Alaska 1973). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Thessen v. State
green
1 sentence1986Id. at 314 . 17 Three years later we were presented with a very different double jeopardy issue in Thessen v. State, 508 P.2d 1192 (Alaska 1973). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.