Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blockburger v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2019Id . 1999 OK CR 48, ¶ 4, 993 P.2d at 125; Blockburger v. United States , 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. 180, 182, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932). 2019Id . 1999 OK CR 48, ¶ 4, 993 P.2d at 125; Blockburger v. United States , 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. 180, 182, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932). | 1 | 2 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Id . 1999 OK CR 48, ¶ 4, 993 P.2d at 125; Blockburger v. United States , 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. 180, 182, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932). 2019Id . 1999 OK CR 48, ¶ 4, 993 P.2d at 125; Blockburger v. United States , 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. 180, 182, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932). | 1 | 2 |
Howard v. Stategreen1 sentence1978The rule is well-settled that only when the State’s case is entirely circumstantial is an instruction on circumstantial evidence mandatory, and, as we held in Howard v. State, Okl.Cr., 561 P.2d 125, 134 (1977), where there is sufficient direct evidence of each element of the offense it is not error for the trial court to refuse the defendant’s requested instruction on circumstantial evidence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Richardson v. State
green
1 sentence2017Article 1, Section 14 of the Indiana Constitution prohibits double jeopardy, providing that “[n]o person shall be put in jeopardy twice for the same offense.” As the Indiana Supreme Court has explained: In Richardson v. State, 717 N.E.2d 32 (Ind. 1999)[,] this Court concluded that two or more offenses are the same offense in violation of article 1, section 14 if, with respect to either .the statutory elements of the challenged crimes or the actual evidence used to obtain convictions, the essential elements of one challenged offense also establish the essential elements of another challenged of | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Miller v. State
neutral
1 sentence1974In regard to appellant’s first two contentions, we note the case of Miller v. State, Okl.Cr., 508 P.2d 656 (1973), wherein this Court, with identical issues before it, laid these two questions to rest, contrary to appellant’s arguments. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
In Re Simmons
neutral
1 sentence1938In re Simmons, 4 Okla. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Rambo v. State
neutral
1 sentence1927Rambo v. State, 38 Okla. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Evans v. Willis, County Judge
green
2 sentences1911Counsel in their brief say: *437 “Wfe urge that the petitioner was entitled to a trial by jury in the municipal court of the city of Tulsa, and that the court is in error in holding that the right of appeal to a court in which a jury trial may be had meets the constitutional guaranty of a trial by jury.” In support of this position, they cite Evans v. Willis, 22 Okla. 310 , 97 Pac. 1047 , 19 L. 1911Counsel in their brief say: *437 “Wfe urge that the petitioner was entitled to a trial by jury in the municipal court of the city of Tulsa, and that the court is in error in holding that the right of appeal to a court in which a jury trial may be had meets the constitutional guaranty of a trial by jury.” In support of this position, they cite Evans v. Willis, 22 Okla. 310 , 97 Pac. 1047 , 19 L. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.