16 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1957–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Flynngreen2 sentences2008See State v. Flynn, 14 Conn. App. 10, 20 , 539 A.2d 1005 (“the crimes of interference with an officer and assault on an officer constitute the same offense and because there is no expression of legislative intent that the crimes warrant separate punishment, the . . . conviction on both counts . . . violate [s] the constitutional and common law prohibitions against double jeopardy”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S. Ct. 226 , 102 L. 2008See State v. Flynn, 14 Conn. App. 10, 20 , 539 A.2d 1005 (“the crimes of interference with an officer and assault on an officer constitute the same offense and because there is no expression of legislative intent that the crimes warrant separate punishment, the . . . conviction on both counts . . . violate [s] the constitutional and common law prohibitions against double jeopardy”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S. Ct. 226 , 102 L. | 1 | 1 |
Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V.green1 sentence2008See State v. Flynn, 14 Conn. App. 10, 20 , 539 A.2d 1005 (“the crimes of interference with an officer and assault on an officer constitute the same offense and because there is no expression of legislative intent that the crimes warrant separate punishment, the . . . conviction on both counts . . . violate [s] the constitutional and common law prohibitions against double jeopardy”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S. Ct. 226 , 102 L. | 1 | 1 |
Cannon v. Rowengreen1 sentence2008See State v. Flynn, 14 Conn. App. 10, 20 , 539 A.2d 1005 (“the crimes of interference with an officer and assault on an officer constitute the same offense and because there is no expression of legislative intent that the crimes warrant separate punishment, the . . . conviction on both counts . . . violate [s] the constitutional and common law prohibitions against double jeopardy”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S. Ct. 226 , 102 L. | 1 | 1 |
Vogt v. Abishgreen1 sentence2008See State v. Flynn, 14 Conn. App. 10, 20 , 539 A.2d 1005 (“the crimes of interference with an officer and assault on an officer constitute the same offense and because there is no expression of legislative intent that the crimes warrant separate punishment, the . . . conviction on both counts . . . violate [s] the constitutional and common law prohibitions against double jeopardy”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S. Ct. 226 , 102 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Godfreygreen1 sentence1996The separate offense doctrine implicates double jeopardy concerns.” State v. Falcon, supra, 26 Conn. App. 264 ; see also State v. Guess, 39 Conn. App. 224, 238-39 , 665 A.2d 126 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Edwardsgreen1 sentence1996The separate offense doctrine implicates double jeopardy concerns.” State v. Falcon, supra, 26 Conn. App. 264 ; see also State v. Guess, 39 Conn. App. 224, 238-39 , 665 A.2d 126 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Guessgreen2 sentences1996The separate offense doctrine implicates double jeopardy concerns.” State v. Falcon, supra, 26 Conn. App. 264 ; see also State v. Guess, 39 Conn. App. 224, 238-39 , 665 A.2d 126 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995). 1996The separate offense doctrine implicates double jeopardy concerns.” State v. Falcon, supra, 26 Conn. App. 264 ; see also State v. Guess, 39 Conn. App. 224, 238-39 , 665 A.2d 126 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
Michael Hoover v. Garfield Heights Municipal Courtgreen1 sentence1993We further noted that in Hoover v. Garfield Heights Municipal Court, 802 F.2d 168, 175 (6th Cir. 1986), the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded as we did that a trial court’s failure to instruct on an essential element of an offense is an error to which harmless error analysis does not apply. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Allengreen1 sentence1966See such cases as Gori v. United States, 367 U.S. 364, 369 ; Brock v. North Carolina, 344 U.S. 424, 427 ; Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684, 689 ; State v. Williamson, 134 Conn. 203, 204 ; State v. Allen, 46 Conn. 531, 539, 541-43 . | 1 | 1 |
Gori v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1966See such cases as Gori v. United States, 367 U.S. 364, 369 ; Brock v. North Carolina, 344 U.S. 424, 427 ; Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684, 689 ; State v. Williamson, 134 Conn. 203, 204 ; State v. Allen, 46 Conn. 531, 539, 541-43 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Walton
green
1 sentence2020Held that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence, as the double jeopardy claim advanced by the defendant was untenable: each of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree, assault in the first degree and conspiracy to commit kidnapping in the first degree plainly required proof of a fact that the others did not, and they were not the same offense under the test enunciated in Blockburger v. United States ( 284 U.S. 299 ); moreover, this court could not conclude that the statutes in question evinced a clear legislative intent to prohibit a def | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Blockburger v. United States
green
1 sentence2020Held that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence, as the double jeopardy claim advanced by the defendant was untenable: each of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree, assault in the first degree and conspiracy to commit kidnapping in the first degree plainly required proof of a fact that the others did not, and they were not the same offense under the test enunciated in Blockburger v. United States ( 284 U.S. 299 ); moreover, this court could not conclude that the statutes in question evinced a clear legislative intent to prohibit a def | 1 | 2020–2020 |
North Carolina v. Alford
green
2 sentences2006On appeal, the defendant claims that because General Statutes § 53a-32a 3 pertains only to probationers who entered a plea of nolo contendere or a guilty plea to the underlying offense under the doctrine of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S. Ct. 160 , 27 L. 2006On appeal, the defendant claims that because General Statutes § 53a-32a 3 pertains only to probationers who entered a plea of nolo contendere or a guilty plea to the underlying offense under the doctrine of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S. Ct. 160 , 27 L. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. D'Antonio
green
2 sentences2003For the details of the defendant’s appeal from the ensuing judgments of the trial court revoking his probation, see State v. D'Antonio, 79 Conn. App. 683 , 830 A.2d 1187 (2003). 2003For the details of the defendant’s appeal from the ensuing judgments of the trial court revoking his probation, see State v. D'Antonio, 79 Conn. App. 683 , 830 A.2d 1187 (2003). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Hill
green
1 sentence2002Even if we were to credit the defendant’s assertion that his failure to comply with the terms of his probation was not wilful, we would be obliged to affirm the court’s decision because wilfulness is not an element of the offense of violation of probation. 6 See id., 426 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Bartkus v. Illinois
green
1 sentence1995There is no constitutional prohibition against a state prosecution for the same acts which resulted in a federal prosecution; Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121 . . . (1959); or vice versa. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Marshall v. DelPonte
green
1 sentence1993II CT Page 8-Q The means of extrapolation, determining the plaintiff's BAC at the time of the offense to the test results, can be via the hearing officer's own expertise or through the taking of judicial notice if he notifies the parties in a timely manner "of his intent to rely on either his special expertise or judicial notice." Marshall v. DelPonte, 27 Conn. App. 346 . 352. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Tweedy
green
1 sentence1991Id. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Shockley
green
2 sentences1990While “[i]t is axiomatic that ‘penal statutes and rules of criminal procedure are to be strictly construed to protect the fundamental constitutional right to liberty’ State v. Shockley, 188 Conn. 697, 714 , 453 A.2d 441 (1982) (Speziale, C. 1990While “[i]t is axiomatic that ‘penal statutes and rules of criminal procedure are to be strictly construed to protect the fundamental constitutional right to liberty’ State v. Shockley, 188 Conn. 697, 714 , 453 A.2d 441 (1982) (Speziale, C. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Mancinone
green
2 sentences1989Although the defendant did not properly preserve this claim at trial, it is reviewable under State v. Evans, supra. State v. Mancinone, 15 Conn. App. 251, 273 , 545 A.2d 1131 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1017 , 109 S. Ct. 1132 , 103 L. 1989Although the defendant did not properly preserve this claim at trial, it is reviewable under State v. Evans, supra. State v. Mancinone, 15 Conn. App. 251, 273 , 545 A.2d 1131 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1017 , 109 S. Ct. 1132 , 103 L. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Mancinone v. Connecticut
green
1 sentence1989Although the defendant did not properly preserve this claim at trial, it is reviewable under State v. Evans, supra. State v. Mancinone, 15 Conn. App. 251, 273 , 545 A.2d 1131 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1017 , 109 S. Ct. 1132 , 103 L. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Bechtel Construction, Inc. v. Laborers District Council
green
1 sentence1989Although the defendant did not properly preserve this claim at trial, it is reviewable under State v. Evans, supra. State v. Mancinone, 15 Conn. App. 251, 273 , 545 A.2d 1131 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1017 , 109 S. Ct. 1132 , 103 L. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Mancinone v. Connecticut
green
1 sentence1989Although the defendant did not properly preserve this claim at trial, it is reviewable under State v. Evans, supra. State v. Mancinone, 15 Conn. App. 251, 273 , 545 A.2d 1131 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1017 , 109 S. Ct. 1132 , 103 L. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. McCall
green
2 sentences1984We have recently addressed this precise issue in State v. McCall, 187 Conn. 73 , 444 A.2d 896 (1982). 1984We have recently addressed this precise issue in State v. McCall, 187 Conn. 73 , 444 A.2d 896 (1982). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
North Carolina v. Pearce
red
2 sentences1981North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 , 89 S. Ct. 2072 , 23 L. 1981North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 , 89 S. Ct. 2072 , 23 L. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
State v. Williamson
green
1 sentence1966See such cases as Gori v. United States, 367 U.S. 364, 369 ; Brock v. North Carolina, 344 U.S. 424, 427 ; Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684, 689 ; State v. Williamson, 134 Conn. 203, 204 ; State v. Allen, 46 Conn. 531, 539, 541-43 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Brock v. North Carolina
green
1 sentence1966See such cases as Gori v. United States, 367 U.S. 364, 369 ; Brock v. North Carolina, 344 U.S. 424, 427 ; Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684, 689 ; State v. Williamson, 134 Conn. 203, 204 ; State v. Allen, 46 Conn. 531, 539, 541-43 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Wade v. Hunter
green
1 sentence1966See such cases as Gori v. United States, 367 U.S. 364, 369 ; Brock v. North Carolina, 344 U.S. 424, 427 ; Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684, 689 ; State v. Williamson, 134 Conn. 203, 204 ; State v. Allen, 46 Conn. 531, 539, 541-43 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
United States v. Benz
green
1 sentence1957A portion of the written opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Ex parte Lange, supra, 173, which was also quoted at length in United States v. Benz, supra, 308 , reasons the problem clearly and distinctly as follows: "For of what avail is the constitutional protection against more than one trial if there can be any number of sentences pronounced on the same verdict? | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.