Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1910–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Wexlergreen1 sentence1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta | 1 | 1 |
Carter v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta 1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, (Wayne) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Younggreen2 sentences1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta 1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Lawrence Kearneygreen1 sentence1978It is important to add that the record of the trial court proceedings indicates the judge paid little heed to the salutary warning almost a decade ago that “[t]he issue of narcotics use is one that may properly be handled with some sensitivity lest it result in undue and unnecessary prejudice.” United States v. Kearney, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 328 , 332, 420 F.2d 170,174 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Benjamin Indivigliogreen1 sentence1967United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F.2d 276, 279 (2d Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907 , 86 S.Ct. 887 (1966); Villaroman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 240 , 184 F.2d 261 , 21 A.L.R.2d 1074 (1950). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Neil v. Biggers
green
2 sentences1975Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 201 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). 1975Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 201 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). | 2 | 1975–1975 |
Delaware v. Van Arsdall
green
2 sentences1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta 1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Stotts v. United States
green
2 sentences1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta 1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, (Wayne) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Webb v. United States
green
2 sentences1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta 1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, (Wayne) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Beachboard v. Egger
green
2 sentences1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta 1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, (Wayne) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Cahn v. United States
green
1 sentence1989The salutary rule that a cross-examiner may not ask a witness whether other witnesses are lying, ( Wayne ) Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985), because, as the trial judge ruled in this case, one witness may not express an opinion about another's credibility, does not preclude an attorney from drawing reasonable inferences during his closing argument from contradictory testimony in the record. [1] "It is impossible to expect that a criminal trial shall be conducted without some showing of feeling; the sta | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Villaroman v. United States
green
2 sentences1967United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F.2d 276, 279 (2d Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907 , 86 S.Ct. 887 (1966); Villaroman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 240 , 184 F.2d 261 , 21 A.L.R.2d 1074 (1950). 1967United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F.2d 276, 279 (2d Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907 , 86 S.Ct. 887 (1966); Villaroman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 240 , 184 F.2d 261 , 21 A.L.R.2d 1074 (1950). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Arrington v. Ohio
green
1 sentence1967United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F.2d 276, 279 (2d Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907 , 86 S.Ct. 887 (1966); Villaroman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 240 , 184 F.2d 261 , 21 A.L.R.2d 1074 (1950). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Campbell v. United States
green
1 sentence1967United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F.2d 276, 279 (2d Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907 , 86 S.Ct. 887 (1966); Villaroman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 240 , 184 F.2d 261 , 21 A.L.R.2d 1074 (1950). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
The New England
green
1 sentence1910In discussing this question, the court, in the case of The New England, 110 Fed. 415 , said: “It should be added, further, that it is doutbful if any limitation which seeks to protect a company, not from the negligence, but from the theft or conversion, of its servants, is consonant with public policy.” Story, in his work on Bailments, 8th ed. § 32, says: “In respect to cases of loss by fraud, there is a salutary principle, belonging both to our law and the civil law. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.