5 Nebraska opinions name it 1 courts 1927–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Grein v. BD. OF EDUC. OF SCH. DIST. OF FREMONTgreen2 sentences2000See Grein v. Board of Education, 216 Neb. 158, 343 N.W.2d 718 (1984). 2000See Grein v. Board of Education, 216 Neb. 158, 343 N.W.2d 718 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Cohen v. Jenkintown Cab Co.green2 sentences1985Wash. 1975).) “The [lawyer-client] privilege exists only to aid in the administration of justice, and when it is shown that the interests of the administration of justice can only be frustrated by the exercise of the privilege, the trial judge may require that the communication be disclosed.” Cohen, et vir v. Jenkintown Cab Co., et al., 238 Pa. Super. 456, 464 , 357 A.2d 689, 693-94 (1976). 1985Wash. 1975).) “The [lawyer-client] privilege exists only to aid in the administration of justice, and when it is shown that the interests of the administration of justice can only be frustrated by the exercise of the privilege, the trial judge may require that the communication be disclosed.” Cohen, et vir v. Jenkintown Cab Co., et al., 238 Pa. Super. 456, 464 , 357 A.2d 689, 693-94 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Brown
green
2 sentences1962That the legislature had no such intention is clear from the fact that sec. 85.40 (5), Stats., both requires that a driver operate with due regard for the safety of others and prohibits the exercise of his privilege with a reckless disregard for their safety.” See, also, Johnson v. Brown, 75 Nev. 437 , 345 P. 2d 754 . *799 In Goddard v. Williams, 251 N. C. 128 , 110 S. E. 2d 820 , it was said', relating to the conduct of a police officer chasing a traffic violator, where the police officer was involved in an accident, that his conduct is to be examined by another standard. 1962That the legislature had no such intention is clear from the fact that sec. 85.40 (5), Stats., both requires that a driver operate with due regard for the safety of others and prohibits the exercise of his privilege with a reckless disregard for their safety.” See, also, Johnson v. Brown, 75 Nev. 437 , 345 P. 2d 754 . *799 In Goddard v. Williams, 251 N. C. 128 , 110 S. E. 2d 820 , it was said', relating to the conduct of a police officer chasing a traffic violator, where the police officer was involved in an accident, that his conduct is to be examined by another standard. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Goddard v. Williams
red
2 sentences1962That the legislature had no such intention is clear from the fact that sec. 85.40 (5), Stats., both requires that a driver operate with due regard for the safety of others and prohibits the exercise of his privilege with a reckless disregard for their safety.” See, also, Johnson v. Brown, 75 Nev. 437 , 345 P. 2d 754 . *799 In Goddard v. Williams, 251 N. C. 128 , 110 S. E. 2d 820 , it was said', relating to the conduct of a police officer chasing a traffic violator, where the police officer was involved in an accident, that his conduct is to be examined by another standard. 1962That the legislature had no such intention is clear from the fact that sec. 85.40 (5), Stats., both requires that a driver operate with due regard for the safety of others and prohibits the exercise of his privilege with a reckless disregard for their safety.” See, also, Johnson v. Brown, 75 Nev. 437 , 345 P. 2d 754 . *799 In Goddard v. Williams, 251 N. C. 128 , 110 S. E. 2d 820 , it was said', relating to the conduct of a police officer chasing a traffic violator, where the police officer was involved in an accident, that his conduct is to be examined by another standard. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Rasp v. McHugh
neutral
2 sentences1940Rasp v. McHugh, 121 Neb. 380 , 237 N. W. 394 ; Wichelmann v. City of Glencoe, 200 Minn. 62 , 273 N. W. 638 ; Sartwelle v. Dunn, 120 S. W. (2d) (Tex. Civ. 1940Rasp v. McHugh, 121 Neb. 380 , 237 N. W. 394 ; Wichelmann v. City of Glencoe, 200 Minn. 62 , 273 N. W. 638 ; Sartwelle v. Dunn, 120 S. W. (2d) (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Wichelmann v. City of Glencoe
green
2 sentences1940Rasp v. McHugh, 121 Neb. 380 , 237 N. W. 394 ; Wichelmann v. City of Glencoe, 200 Minn. 62 , 273 N. W. 638 ; Sartwelle v. Dunn, 120 S. W. (2d) (Tex. Civ. 1940Rasp v. McHugh, 121 Neb. 380 , 237 N. W. 394 ; Wichelmann v. City of Glencoe, 200 Minn. 62 , 273 N. W. 638 ; Sartwelle v. Dunn, 120 S. W. (2d) (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Wright v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance
green
1 sentence1927Co., 193 U. S. 657 , which dealt with an act of the legislature of Minnesota, and the amendment of the articles of incorporation of a mutual insurance association to an “old line” flat premium plan; the act was adopted and amendment made after the com plainants became members of the association, and it is’ there stated: “Where the right of amendment is reserved in the statute or articles of association, it is because the right to make changes which the business may require is recognized, and' the exercise of the privilege may be vested in the controlling body of the corporation. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.