Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1916–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Price Rubber Corp.green1 sentence2007See Birmingham Hockey Club, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc., 827 So.2d 73, 84 (Ala.2002)(quoting Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Price Rubber Corp., 182 B.R. 901, 911 (M.D.Ala.1995)(under doctrine of primary jurisdiction, the court may retain jurisdiction or may dismiss the case without prejudice and also has the option of staying the proceedings, retaining jurisdiction and referring the matter to the agency for an administrative ruling)). | 1 | 1 |
Birmingham Hockey Club, Inc. v. NCCI, INC.green1 sentence2007See Birmingham Hockey Club, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc., 827 So.2d 73, 84 (Ala.2002)(quoting Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Price Rubber Corp., 182 B.R. 901, 911 (M.D.Ala.1995)(under doctrine of primary jurisdiction, the court may retain jurisdiction or may dismiss the case without prejudice and also has the option of staying the proceedings, retaining jurisdiction and referring the matter to the agency for an administrative ruling)). | 1 | 1 |
A. Magnano Co. v. Hamiltongreen2 sentences1943Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, 292 U. S. 40, 44, 45 , 54 S. Ct. 599, 601 , 78 L. 1943Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, 292 U. S. 40, 44, 45 , 54 S. Ct. 599, 601 , 78 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Furst & Thomas v. Brewster
green
2 sentences1969The action is for the interstate sale of goods, not intrastate activities or sales. " 'Importation into one state from another is the indispensable element, the test, of interstate commerce; and every negotiation, contract, trade, and dealing between citizens of different states, which contemplates and causes such importation, whether it be of goods, persons, or information, is a transaction of interstate commerce.' Such commerce comprehends all the component parts of commercial intercourse between different states, and, according to established principle, any state statute which obstructs or 1969The action is for the interstate sale of goods, not intrastate activities or sales. " 'Importation into one state from another is the indispensable element, the test, of interstate commerce; and every negotiation, contract, trade, and dealing between citizens of different states, which contemplates and causes such importation, whether it be of goods, persons, or information, is a transaction of interstate commerce.' Such commerce comprehends all the component parts of commercial intercourse between different states, and, according to established principle, any state statute which obstructs or | 2 | 1932–1969 |
Oskey Brothers Petroleum Corporation v. Gorder
neutral
2 sentences1969The action is for the interstate sale of goods, not intrastate activities or sales. " 'Importation into one state from another is the indispensable element, the test, of interstate commerce; and every negotiation, contract, trade, and dealing between citizens of different states, which contemplates and causes such importation, whether it be of goods, persons, or information, is a transaction of interstate commerce.' Such commerce comprehends all the component parts of commercial intercourse between different states, and, according to established principle, any state statute which obstructs or 1969The action is for the interstate sale of goods, not intrastate activities or sales. " 'Importation into one state from another is the indispensable element, the test, of interstate commerce; and every negotiation, contract, trade, and dealing between citizens of different states, which contemplates and causes such importation, whether it be of goods, persons, or information, is a transaction of interstate commerce.' Such commerce comprehends all the component parts of commercial intercourse between different states, and, according to established principle, any state statute which obstructs or | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Dakota Photo Engraving Co. v. Woodland
neutral
2 sentences1969The action is for the interstate sale of goods, not intrastate activities or sales. " 'Importation into one state from another is the indispensable element, the test, of interstate commerce; and every negotiation, contract, trade, and dealing between citizens of different states, which contemplates and causes such importation, whether it be of goods, persons, or information, is a transaction of interstate commerce.' Such commerce comprehends all the component parts of commercial intercourse between different states, and, according to established principle, any state statute which obstructs or 1969The action is for the interstate sale of goods, not intrastate activities or sales. " 'Importation into one state from another is the indispensable element, the test, of interstate commerce; and every negotiation, contract, trade, and dealing between citizens of different states, which contemplates and causes such importation, whether it be of goods, persons, or information, is a transaction of interstate commerce.' Such commerce comprehends all the component parts of commercial intercourse between different states, and, according to established principle, any state statute which obstructs or | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Pointer v. United States
green
1 sentence1947For all that appears in this case, the juror placed upon the panel was just as acceptable to the defendant and as free from bias or prejudice as was any juryman so displaced.” The case of Pointer v. United States, supra [ 151 U. S. 396 , 14 S. Ct. 416 ], was one in which the defendant was entitled to twenty peremptory challenges. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Leisy v. Hardin
green
2 sentences1932Leisy v. Hardine, 135 U. S. 100 , 10 S. Ct. 681 , 34 L. 1932Leisy v. Hardine, 135 U. S. 100 , 10 S. Ct. 681 , 34 L. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Lucy v. Freeman
neutral
2 sentences1916As stated in Lacy v. Freeman, 93 Minn. 274 , 101 N. W. 167 : “It is elementary that parties may make and enter into such contracts, bargains, and agreements- as they may deem best for their interests, and’ neither the Legislature nor the courts have the power or right to restrict' them in the exercise of that privilege, so long as their contracts are notn immoral or tainted with positive illegality. 1916As stated in Lacy v. Freeman, 93 Minn. 274 , 101 N. W. 167 : “It is elementary that parties may make and enter into such contracts, bargains, and agreements- as they may deem best for their interests, and’ neither the Legislature nor the courts have the power or right to restrict' them in the exercise of that privilege, so long as their contracts are notn immoral or tainted with positive illegality. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.