5 Virginia opinions name it 4 courts 1971–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
International Shoe Co. v. Washingtongreen2 sentences1971The exercise of that privilege may give rise to obligations, and, so far as those obligations arise out of or are connected with the activities within the state, a pro *739 cedure which requires the corporation to respond to a suit brought to enforce them can, in most instances, hardly be said to be undue.” 326 U.S. at 319 , 66 S.Ct. at 160 , 90 L.Ed. at 104 . 1971The exercise of that privilege may give rise to obligations, and, so far as those obligations arise out of or are connected with the activities within the state, a pro *739 cedure which requires the corporation to respond to a suit brought to enforce them can, in most instances, hardly be said to be undue.” 326 U.S. at 319 , 66 S.Ct. at 160 , 90 L.Ed. at 104 . | 1 | 2 |
Monument Associates v. Arlington County Boardgreen2 sentences2011Bd., 242 Va. 145, 147-48 , 408 S.E.2d 889, 890 (1991), the BPOL taxable measure can only include "those gross receipts attributed to the exercise of a privilege subject to licensure at a definite place of business" in the taxing jurisdiction. 2011Bd., 242 Va. 145, 147-48 , 408 S.E.2d 889, 890 (1991), the BPOL taxable measure can only include "those gross receipts attributed to the exercise of a privilege subject to licensure at a definite place of business" in the taxing jurisdiction. | 1 | 1 |
Grunewald v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1998See Dean v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 666, 670 , 166 S.E.2d 228, 231 (1969) (relying on Griffin and determining that Fifth Amendment precludes prosecution’s use of a defendant’s refusal to testify in another trial because “[t]he value of constitutional privileges is largely destroyed if persons can be penalized from relying on them” (quoting Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 425 , 77 S.Ct. 963, 984 , 1 L.Ed.2d 931 (1957) (Black, J., concurring))). 1998See Dean v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 666, 670 , 166 S.E.2d 228, 231 (1969) (relying on Griffin and determining that Fifth Amendment precludes prosecution’s use of a defendant’s refusal to testify in another trial because “[t]he value of constitutional privileges is largely destroyed if persons can be penalized from relying on them” (quoting Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 425 , 77 S.Ct. 963, 984 , 1 L.Ed.2d 931 (1957) (Black, J., concurring))). | 1 | 1 |
Dean v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1998See Dean v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 666, 670 , 166 S.E.2d 228, 231 (1969) (relying on Griffin and determining that Fifth Amendment precludes prosecution’s use of a defendant’s refusal to testify in another trial because “[t]he value of constitutional privileges is largely destroyed if persons can be penalized from relying on them” (quoting Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 425 , 77 S.Ct. 963, 984 , 1 L.Ed.2d 931 (1957) (Black, J., concurring))). 1998See Dean v. Commonwealth, 209 Va. 666, 670 , 166 S.E.2d 228, 231 (1969) (relying on Griffin and determining that Fifth Amendment precludes prosecution’s use of a defendant’s refusal to testify in another trial because “[t]he value of constitutional privileges is largely destroyed if persons can be penalized from relying on them” (quoting Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 425 , 77 S.Ct. 963, 984 , 1 L.Ed.2d 931 (1957) (Black, J., concurring))). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stockham v. Stockham
green
1 sentence1975Stockham v. Stockham, 168 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 1964), expresses the principle that the Fifth Amendment is not a shield in all situations, stating that ... in civil litigation where it is manifest the exercise of the privilege would operate to further the action or claim of the party resorting to the privilege against his adversary contrary to equity and good conscience, the party asserting privilege will not be permitted to proceed with his claim or action. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
McGee v. International Life Insurance
green
1 sentence1971The doctrine of International Shoe was applied in McGee, supra. There the Court upheld the power of California to subject a foreign corporation to suit in its courts on the mere basis of an isolated insurance contract, “which had substantial connection with that State.” 355 U.S. at 223 , 78 S.Ct. at 201, 2 L.Ed.2d at 226. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.