14 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1904–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
New York Life Insurance v. Clay Countygreen1 sentence2024Life Ins. v. Clay County, 267 N.W. 79, 81 (Iowa 1936) (stating trespass to personal property requires the violation of a possessory right as well as forceful damage); Welch v. Jenks, 12 N.W. 727, 728 (Iowa 1882) (reversing dismissal of claim for wrongful taking of corn); Patterson v. Clark, 20 Iowa 429 , 430–31 (1866) (involving trespass action for taking possession of wagon); Ralston v. Black, 15 Iowa 47, 49 (1863) (stating trespass to chattel occurs only where there is an “unlawful intermeddling with, or an exercise or claim of dominion over property”); Dyson v. Ream, 9 Iowa 51 , 51–53 (1859 | 1 | 1 |
Ralston v. Blackgreen1 sentence2024Life Ins. v. Clay County, 267 N.W. 79, 81 (Iowa 1936) (stating trespass to personal property requires the violation of a possessory right as well as forceful damage); Welch v. Jenks, 12 N.W. 727, 728 (Iowa 1882) (reversing dismissal of claim for wrongful taking of corn); Patterson v. Clark, 20 Iowa 429 , 430–31 (1866) (involving trespass action for taking possession of wagon); Ralston v. Black, 15 Iowa 47, 49 (1863) (stating trespass to chattel occurs only where there is an “unlawful intermeddling with, or an exercise or claim of dominion over property”); Dyson v. Ream, 9 Iowa 51 , 51–53 (1859 | 1 | 1 |
Welch v. Jenksgreen1 sentence2024Life Ins. v. Clay County, 267 N.W. 79, 81 (Iowa 1936) (stating trespass to personal property requires the violation of a possessory right as well as forceful damage); Welch v. Jenks, 12 N.W. 727, 728 (Iowa 1882) (reversing dismissal of claim for wrongful taking of corn); Patterson v. Clark, 20 Iowa 429 , 430–31 (1866) (involving trespass action for taking possession of wagon); Ralston v. Black, 15 Iowa 47, 49 (1863) (stating trespass to chattel occurs only where there is an “unlawful intermeddling with, or an exercise or claim of dominion over property”); Dyson v. Ream, 9 Iowa 51 , 51–53 (1859 | 1 | 1 |
Raetzel v. Parks/Bellemont Absentee Election Boardgreen1 sentence2020Ga. 2018) (“Courts around the country have recognized that ‘[w]hile it is true that 8Available at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us- cases.html#states [https://perma.cc/7YY2-65TY]. 9Available at https://wcfcourier.com/news/local/govt-and- politics/patepredicts-80-absentee-voting-innovember/article_52e175a1-832b-57fb- 8a50-36dbbd3bc668.html [https://perma.cc/F4HK-NJVN]. 28 absentee voting is a privilege and a convenience to voters, this does not grant the state the latitude to deprive citizens of due process with respect to the exercise of this privilege.’ ” (alteration | 1 | 1 |
State v. Beachgreen1 sentence2015When a statute’s language is clear, we look no further for meaning than its express terms.” State v. Beach, 630 N.W.2d 598, 600 (Iowa 2001) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Grosjean v. American Press Co.green2 sentences1990The Court emphasized that the tax at issue was “a license tax — a flat tax imposed on the exercise of a privilege granted by the Bill of Rights,” Murdock, 319 U.S. at 113 , 63 S.Ct. at 875 , 87 L.Ed. at 1298 , and cautioned that they did “not mean to say that religious groups ... are free from all financial burdens of government.” Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 250 , 56 S.Ct. 444, 449 , 80 L.Ed. 660, 668 (1936). 1990The Court emphasized that the tax at issue was “a license tax — a flat tax imposed on the exercise of a privilege granted by the Bill of Rights,” Murdock, 319 U.S. at 113 , 63 S.Ct. at 875 , 87 L.Ed. at 1298 , and cautioned that they did “not mean to say that religious groups ... are free from all financial burdens of government.” Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 250 , 56 S.Ct. 444, 449 , 80 L.Ed. 660, 668 (1936). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mosher
neutral
2 sentences1917That the state may determine what acts constitute practice as a physician, and may impose conditions on the exercise of that privilege, was held in State v. Mosher, 78 Iowa 321 , State v. Bair, 112 Iowa 466 , State v. Corwin, 151 Iowa 420 . 1911State v. Mosher, 78 Iowa, 321 ; State v. Bair, 112 Iowa, 466 . | 3 | 1904–1917 |
State v. Bair
green
2 sentences1917That the state may determine what acts constitute practice as a physician, and may impose conditions on the exercise of that privilege, was held in State v. Mosher, 78 Iowa 321 , State v. Bair, 112 Iowa 466 , State v. Corwin, 151 Iowa 420 . 1911State v. Mosher, 78 Iowa, 321 ; State v. Bair, 112 Iowa, 466 . | 3 | 1904–1917 |
Dyson v. Ream
green
1 sentence2024Life Ins. v. Clay County, 267 N.W. 79, 81 (Iowa 1936) (stating trespass to personal property requires the violation of a possessory right as well as forceful damage); Welch v. Jenks, 12 N.W. 727, 728 (Iowa 1882) (reversing dismissal of claim for wrongful taking of corn); Patterson v. Clark, 20 Iowa 429 , 430–31 (1866) (involving trespass action for taking possession of wagon); Ralston v. Black, 15 Iowa 47, 49 (1863) (stating trespass to chattel occurs only where there is an “unlawful intermeddling with, or an exercise or claim of dominion over property”); Dyson v. Ream, 9 Iowa 51 , 51–53 (1859 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Patterson v. Clark
neutral
1 sentence2024Life Ins. v. Clay County, 267 N.W. 79, 81 (Iowa 1936) (stating trespass to personal property requires the violation of a possessory right as well as forceful damage); Welch v. Jenks, 12 N.W. 727, 728 (Iowa 1882) (reversing dismissal of claim for wrongful taking of corn); Patterson v. Clark, 20 Iowa 429 , 430–31 (1866) (involving trespass action for taking possession of wagon); Ralston v. Black, 15 Iowa 47, 49 (1863) (stating trespass to chattel occurs only where there is an “unlawful intermeddling with, or an exercise or claim of dominion over property”); Dyson v. Ream, 9 Iowa 51 , 51–53 (1859 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
green
2 sentences1990The Court emphasized that the tax at issue was “a license tax — a flat tax imposed on the exercise of a privilege granted by the Bill of Rights,” Murdock, 319 U.S. at 113 , 63 S.Ct. at 875 , 87 L.Ed. at 1298 , and cautioned that they did “not mean to say that religious groups ... are free from all financial burdens of government.” Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 250 , 56 S.Ct. 444, 449 , 80 L.Ed. 660, 668 (1936). 1990The Court emphasized that the tax at issue was “a license tax — a flat tax imposed on the exercise of a privilege granted by the Bill of Rights,” Murdock, 319 U.S. at 113 , 63 S.Ct. at 875 , 87 L.Ed. at 1298 , and cautioned that they did “not mean to say that religious groups ... are free from all financial burdens of government.” Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 250 , 56 S.Ct. 444, 449 , 80 L.Ed. 660, 668 (1936). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Baxter v. Palmigiano
green
2 sentences1981The advice given inmates by the decision-makers is merely a realistic reflection of the evidentiary significance of the choice to remain silent. 425 U.S. at 318 , 96 S.Ct. at 1557 , 47 L.Ed.2d at 821 . 1981The advice given inmates by the decision-makers is merely a realistic reflection of the evidentiary significance of the choice to remain silent. 425 U.S. at 318 , 96 S.Ct. at 1557 , 47 L.Ed.2d at 821 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
McGee v. International Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1975Co., 355 U.S. 220, 223 , 78 S.Ct. 199, 201 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223, 226 . 1975Co., 355 U.S. 220, 223 , 78 S.Ct. 199, 201 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223, 226 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Hanson v. Denckla
green
2 sentences1973The exercise of that privilege may give rise to obligations; and, so far as those obligations arise out of or are connected with the activities within the state, a procedure which requires the corporation to respond to a suit brought to enforce them can, in most instances, hardly be said to be undue.” The following statement appears in Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 , 78 S.Ct. 1228, 1239-1240 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 , 1298: “The unilateral activity of those who claim some relationship with a nonresident defendant cannot satisfy the requirement of contact with the forum State. 1973The exercise of that privilege may give rise to obligations; and, so far as those obligations arise out of or are connected with the activities within the state, a procedure which requires the corporation to respond to a suit brought to enforce them can, in most instances, hardly be said to be undue.” The following statement appears in Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 , 78 S.Ct. 1228, 1239-1240 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 , 1298: “The unilateral activity of those who claim some relationship with a nonresident defendant cannot satisfy the requirement of contact with the forum State. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Rath Packing Co. v. Intercontinental Meat Traders, Inc.
green
2 sentences1973The application of that rule will vary with the quality and nature of the defendant's activity, but it is essential in each case that there be some act by which the defendant purposefully avails himself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws." In Rath Packing Co. v. Intercontinental Meat Trad., Inc., 181 N.W.2d 184 (Iowa 1970), an action for breach of contract, Justice Stuart held that the contacts of defendant with Iowa were insufficient to satisfy due process requirements. 1973The application of that rule will vary with the quality and nature of the defendant’s activity, but it is essential in each case that there be some act by which the defendant purposefully avails himself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.” In Rath Packing Co. v. Intercontinental Meat Trad., Inc., 181 N.W.2d 184 (Iowa 1970), an action for breach of contract, Justice Stuart held that the contacts of defendant with Iowa were insufficient to satisfy due process requirements. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
green
2 sentences1970The exercise of that privilege may give rise to obligations; and, so far as those obligations arise out of or are connected with the activities within the state, a procedure which requires the corporation to respond to a suit brought to enforce them can, in most instances, hardly be said to be undue.” Ibid., 326 U.S. at 319 , 66 S.Ct. at 160 , 90 L.Ed. at 104 . 1970The exercise of that privilege may give rise to obligations; and, so far as those obligations arise out of or are connected with the activities within the state, a procedure which requires the corporation to respond to a suit brought to enforce them can, in most instances, hardly be said to be undue.” Ibid., 326 U.S. at 319 , 66 S.Ct. at 160 , 90 L.Ed. at 104 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1942We may, however, refer to certain statements in the case of Henderson Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, 1896, 166 U. S. 150 , 17 S. Ct. 532 , 41 L. 1942We may, however, refer to certain statements in the case of Henderson Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, 1896, 166 U. S. 150 , 17 S. Ct. 532 , 41 L. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Hanover Precinct v. Atkins
green
1 sentence1932Rep. 359. *1038 The court said further, in Richmond v. Dudley, supra: “It seems from the foregoing authorities to be well established that municipal ordinances placing restrictions upon lawful conduct, or the lawful use of property, must, in order to be valid, specify the rules and conditions to be observed in such conduct or business; and must admit of the exercise of the privilege by all citizens alike, who will comply with such rules and conditions; and must not admit of the exercise, or of an opportunity for the exercise, of any arbitrary discrimination, by the municipal authorities, betwe | 1 | 1932–1932 |
City of Richmond v. Dudley
green
1 sentence1932Rep. 359. *1038 The court said further, in Richmond v. Dudley, supra: “It seems from the foregoing authorities to be well established that municipal ordinances placing restrictions upon lawful conduct, or the lawful use of property, must, in order to be valid, specify the rules and conditions to be observed in such conduct or business; and must admit of the exercise of the privilege by all citizens alike, who will comply with such rules and conditions; and must not admit of the exercise, or of an opportunity for the exercise, of any arbitrary discrimination, by the municipal authorities, betwe | 1 | 1932–1932 |
State v. Corwin
neutral
1 sentence1917That the state may determine what acts constitute practice as a physician, and may impose conditions on the exercise of that privilege, was held in State v. Mosher, 78 Iowa 321 , State v. Bair, 112 Iowa 466 , State v. Corwin, 151 Iowa 420 . | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Hopwood v. McCausland
neutral
1 sentence1912Hopwood v. McCausland, 120 Iowa, 218 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.