Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1924–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Michael M.green1 sentence2022See State v. Michael M., 202 W. | 1 | 1 |
Gelpcke v. Dubuquegreen2 sentences1943See Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque, 68 U. S. 175 , 1 Wall. 175 , 17 L. 1943See Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque, 68 U. S. 175 , 1 Wall. 175 , 17 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Simpson v. WV. OFFICE OF INS. COM'R
green
2 sentences2018Comm’r., 223 W.Va. 495 , 678 S.E.2d 1 (2009). 2017Vol. 2005).” Simpson, 223 W.Va. at 498 , 678 S.E.2d at 4 , syl. pt. 16. | 2 | 2017–2018 |
Simpson v. West Virginia Office of the Insurance Commissioner
green
2 sentences2018Comm’r., 223 W.Va. 495 , 678 S.E.2d 1 (2009). 2017Vol. 2005).” Simpson, 223 W.Va. at 498 , 678 S.E.2d at 4 , syl. pt. 16. | 2 | 2017–2018 |
Gerald v. Edwards
green
1 sentence2005Bailey, supra. See Harris v. West Virginia Secondary School Activities Comm’n., 679 F.2d 881 (4th Cir.1982). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
green
2 sentences1983Id. 326 U.S. at 319 , 66 S.Ct. at 160 . 1983Id. 326 U.S. at 319 , 66 S.Ct. at 160 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Quesenberry v. Estep
green
2 sentences1983Much the same point was made in Quesenberry v. Estep, 142 W.Va. 426 , 95 S.E.2d 832 (1956), where we considered the validity of certain rules promulgated by the Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors. 6 In State v. West Virginia Racing Commission, 133 W.Va. at 194 , 55 S.E.2d at 271 , we also made the point that “the power vested in a board to issue a license for the exercise of a privilege implies the power to revoke such license for good cause,” citing 53 C.J.S. 1983Much the same point was made in Quesenberry v. Estep, 142 W.Va. 426 , 95 S.E.2d 832 (1956), where we considered the validity of certain rules promulgated by the Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors. 6 In State v. West Virginia Racing Commission, 133 W.Va. at 194 , 55 S.E.2d at 271 , we also made the point that “the power vested in a board to issue a license for the exercise of a privilege implies the power to revoke such license for good cause,” citing 53 C.J.S. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State Ex Rel. Morris v. West Virginia Racing Commission
green
2 sentences1983Much the same point was made in Quesenberry v. Estep, 142 W.Va. 426 , 95 S.E.2d 832 (1956), where we considered the validity of certain rules promulgated by the Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors. 6 In State v. West Virginia Racing Commission, 133 W.Va. at 194 , 55 S.E.2d at 271 , we also made the point that “the power vested in a board to issue a license for the exercise of a privilege implies the power to revoke such license for good cause,” citing 53 C.J.S. 1983Much the same point was made in Quesenberry v. Estep, 142 W.Va. 426 , 95 S.E.2d 832 (1956), where we considered the validity of certain rules promulgated by the Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors. 6 In State v. West Virginia Racing Commission, 133 W.Va. at 194 , 55 S.E.2d at 271 , we also made the point that “the power vested in a board to issue a license for the exercise of a privilege implies the power to revoke such license for good cause,” citing 53 C.J.S. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. City of Chicago
neutral
2 sentences1942R. 281, it is said that: *96 “However, relator in seeking on certiorari to have the revocation of its license set aside, and thus to re-establish its license and the resulting privilege, under the ordinance, as a valid enactment, cannot, while thus insistihg on the exercise of a privilege by virtue of the ordinance, also assert that the ordinance under which he claims such privilege is invalid.” The Supreme Court of Illinois, in Pittsburgh, etc., Railway Co. v. City of Chicago, 242 Ill. 178 , 89 N. E. 1022, 1024 , 44 L. 1942R. 281, it is said that: *96 “However, relator in seeking on certiorari to have the revocation of its license set aside, and thus to re-establish its license and the resulting privilege, under the ordinance, as a valid enactment, cannot, while thus insistihg on the exercise of a privilege by virtue of the ordinance, also assert that the ordinance under which he claims such privilege is invalid.” The Supreme Court of Illinois, in Pittsburgh, etc., Railway Co. v. City of Chicago, 242 Ill. 178 , 89 N. E. 1022, 1024 , 44 L. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
State ex rel. Smith v. County Court
neutral
1 sentence1924A municipal ordinance making it unlawful to ■dig in the streets for the purpose of laying gas pipes, “without the consent of the council of the town entered upon the record of said town,” is void, for the reason that it vests the council with arbitrary power to discriminate between citizens who may wish to obtain the privilege. ’ ’ At the time of the issuance of this writ, there was no valid ordinance requiring a building permit in said, town, no valid authority vested in the common council of said town to grant a permit to the relators to build the mill described in the writ: ‘ ‘ Clear legal | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.