35 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Angelerigreen2 sentences2008The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of a defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position. [ Id. at 434 , 555 A. 2d 575 (quoting State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 , 241 A. 2d 3 (1968)).] In State v. Sutton, 237 N.J.Super. 221, 225 , 567 A. 2d 272 (App.Div.1989), the State sought to rely on the Court's opinion in Irving . 2008The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of a defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position. [ Id. at 434 , 555 A. 2d 575 (quoting State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 , 241 A. 2d 3 (1968)).] In State v. Sutton, 237 N.J.Super. 221, 225 , 567 A. 2d 272 (App.Div.1989), the State sought to rely on the Court's opinion in Irving . | 2 | 7 |
State in the Interest of N.H.(076316)green2 sentences2021See N.H., 226 N.J. at 253 (referring to the "critical nature of waiver hearings"). 2019See N.H., 226 N.J. at 253 (referring to the "critical nature of waiver hearings"). | 2 | 2 |
Faretta v. Californiagreen2 sentences2007“The right to defend is given directly to the accused; for it is he [or she] who suffers the consequences if the defense fails.” Id. at 819-20 , 95 S.Ct. at 2533 , 45 L.Ed.2d at 572-73 . 2007“The right to defend is given directly to the accused; for it is he [or she] who suffers the consequences if the defense fails.” Id. at 819-20 , 95 S.Ct. at 2533 , 45 L.Ed.2d at 572-73 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Irvinggreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., State v. Irving, 114 N.J. 427, 434 (1989) ("The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of a defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position."); State v. Noble, 398 N.J. 2008The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of a defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position. [ Id. at 434 , 555 A. 2d 575 (quoting State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 , 241 A. 2d 3 (1968)).] In State v. Sutton, 237 N.J.Super. 221, 225 , 567 A. 2d 272 (App.Div.1989), the State sought to rely on the Court's opinion in Irving . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Baldwingreen2 sentences2008The Court quoted State v. Baldwin, 47 N.J. 379, 388 , 221 A.2d 199 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 980 , 87 S.Ct. 527 , 17 L.Ed.2d 442 (1966), to explain the justification for the rule: [Id. at 385, 241 A.2d 3 .] In answering the contention that the alibi might tend to incriminate the defendant, the Court explained that “[t]he Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of the defense he [or she] makes, nor assure him [or her] a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his [or her] position.” Ibid. 2008The Court quoted State v. Baldwin, 47 N.J. 379, 388 , 221 A.2d 199 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 980 , 87 S.Ct. 527 , 17 L.Ed.2d 442 (1966), to explain the justification for the rule: [Id. at 385, 241 A.2d 3 .] In answering the contention that the alibi might tend to incriminate the defendant, the Court explained that “[t]he Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of the defense he [or she] makes, nor assure him [or her] a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his [or her] position.” Ibid. | 1 | 2 |
Willner v. Vertical Reality, Inc.green1 sentence2024“The proper standards of review of jury instructions are well-settled: if the party contesting 15 the instruction fails to object to it at trial, the standard on appeal is one of plain error; if the party objects, the review is for harmless error.” Willner v. Vertical Reality, Inc., 235 N.J. 65, 80 (2018). | 1 | 1 |
Santosky v. Kramergreen2 sentences2004See, Santosky, supra, 455 U.S. at 753 , 102 S.Ct. at 1393 , 71 L.Ed. 2d at 607 . 2004See, Santosky, supra, 455 U.S. at 753 , 102 S.Ct. at 1393 , 71 L.Ed. 2d at 607 . | 1 | 1 |
Edwards v. Arizonagreen2 sentences2003Id. at 512 , 608 A. 2d 317 . [ State v. Ortisi, 308 N.J.Super. 573, 587-88 , 706 A. 2d 300 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 383 , 718 A. 2d 1212 (1998).] Waiver of the right to counsel "depends in each case `upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.'" Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482 , 101 S.Ct. 1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 378, 385 (1981) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461, 1466 (1938)). 2003Id. at 512 , 608 A. 2d 317 . [ State v. Ortisi, 308 N.J.Super. 573, 587-88 , 706 A. 2d 300 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 383 , 718 A. 2d 1212 (1998).] Waiver of the right to counsel "depends in each case `upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.'" Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482 , 101 S.Ct. 1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 378, 385 (1981) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461, 1466 (1938)). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen2 sentences2003Id. at 512 , 608 A. 2d 317 . [ State v. Ortisi, 308 N.J.Super. 573, 587-88 , 706 A. 2d 300 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 383 , 718 A. 2d 1212 (1998).] Waiver of the right to counsel "depends in each case `upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.'" Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482 , 101 S.Ct. 1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 378, 385 (1981) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461, 1466 (1938)). 2003Id. at 512 , 608 A. 2d 317 . [ State v. Ortisi, 308 N.J.Super. 573, 587-88 , 706 A. 2d 300 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 383 , 718 A. 2d 1212 (1998).] Waiver of the right to counsel "depends in each case `upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.'" Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482 , 101 S.Ct. 1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 378, 385 (1981) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461, 1466 (1938)). | 1 | 1 |
Hudson v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1999See Hudson, supra, 522 U.S. at---, 118 S.Ct. at 493-94 , 139 L. 1999See Hudson, supra, 522 U.S. at---, 118 S.Ct. at 493-94 , 139 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Clemons v. Mississippigreen | 1 | 1 |
| Satterwhite v. Texasgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Sheppardgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Bestgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Trugliagreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Harrisgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| Colonial Gas Energy System v. Unigard Mutual Insurancegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Crisafi
green
2 sentences2007Thus, we held that “[i]n the exceptional case, if the record indicates that the defendant actually understood the risks of proceeding pro se, a waiver may suffice.” Id. at 513 , 608 A.2d 317 (citations omitted). 2007Thus, we held that “[i]n the exceptional case, if the record indicates that the defendant actually understood the risks of proceeding pro se, a waiver may suffice.” Id. at 513 , 608 A.2d 317 (citations omitted). | 3 | 1998–2007 |
Daulby v. California
green
2 sentences2008The Court quoted State v. Baldwin, 47 N.J. 379, 388 , 221 A.2d 199 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 980 , 87 S.Ct. 527 , 17 L.Ed.2d 442 (1966), to explain the justification for the rule: [Id. at 385, 241 A.2d 3 .] In answering the contention that the alibi might tend to incriminate the defendant, the Court explained that “[t]he Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of the defense he [or she] makes, nor assure him [or her] a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his [or her] position.” Ibid. 1984Cf. State v. Baldwin, 47 N.J. 379, 388 (1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 980 , 87 S.Ct. 527 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 442 (1966); State v. Harris, 117 N.J. | 2 | 1984–2008 |
State v. Bates
green
2 sentences2008The Court quoted State v. Baldwin, 47 N.J. 379, 388 , 221 A.2d 199 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 980 , 87 S.Ct. 527 , 17 L.Ed.2d 442 (1966), to explain the justification for the rule: [Id. at 385, 241 A.2d 3 .] In answering the contention that the alibi might tend to incriminate the defendant, the Court explained that “[t]he Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of the defense he [or she] makes, nor assure him [or her] a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his [or her] position.” Ibid. 1984Cf. State v. Baldwin, 47 N.J. 379, 388 (1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 980 , 87 S.Ct. 527 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 442 (1966); State v. Harris, 117 N.J. | 2 | 1984–2008 |
Rodriquez v. United States
green
2 sentences1998That requirement does not violate the privilege against self-incrimination: “The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of the defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position.” State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 , 241 A.2d 3 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 951 , 89 S.Ct. 372 , 21 L.Ed.2d 362 (1968). 1984Our Constitution "does not protect a defendant from the consequences of the defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position." State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 (1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 951 , 89 S.Ct. 372 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 362 (1968). | 2 | 1984–1998 |
Coyne v. Watson
green
2 sentences1998That requirement does not violate the privilege against self-incrimination: “The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of the defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position.” State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 , 241 A.2d 3 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 951 , 89 S.Ct. 372 , 21 L.Ed.2d 362 (1968). 1984Our Constitution "does not protect a defendant from the consequences of the defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position." State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 (1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 951 , 89 S.Ct. 372 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 362 (1968). | 2 | 1984–1998 |
State v. Noble
green
1 sentence2021See, e.g., State v. Irving, 114 N.J. 427, 434 (1989) ("The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of a defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position."); State v. Noble, 398 N.J. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Carreaga
neutral
1 sentence2020State v. Carreaga, 249 N.J. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Hill
green
1 sentence2020The court made careful findings on the record as required by Hill. 199 N.J. at 561 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Pope v. Kingsley
green
2 sentences2011"A consent judgment has equal adjudicative effect as one entered after trial or other judicial determination." Id. at 226 , 714 A. 2d 282 (citing Pope v. Kingsley, 40 N.J. 168, 173 , 191 A. 2d 33 (1963)). 2011"A consent judgment has equal adjudicative effect as one entered after trial or other judicial determination." Id. at 226 , 714 A. 2d 282 (citing Pope v. Kingsley, 40 N.J. 168, 173 , 191 A. 2d 33 (1963)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc.
green
1 sentence2011"A consent judgment has equal adjudicative effect as one entered after trial or other judicial determination." Id. at 226 , 714 A. 2d 282 (citing Pope v. Kingsley, 40 N.J. 168, 173 , 191 A. 2d 33 (1963)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Community Realty Management, Inc. v. Harris
green
1 sentence2011"A consent judgment has equal adjudicative effect as one entered after trial or other judicial determination." Id. at 226 , 714 A. 2d 282 (citing Pope v. Kingsley, 40 N.J. 168, 173 , 191 A. 2d 33 (1963)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Sutton
neutral
2 sentences2008The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of a defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position. [ Id. at 434 , 555 A. 2d 575 (quoting State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 , 241 A. 2d 3 (1968)).] In State v. Sutton, 237 N.J.Super. 221, 225 , 567 A. 2d 272 (App.Div.1989), the State sought to rely on the Court's opinion in Irving . 2008The Constitution does not protect a defendant from the consequences of a defense he makes, nor assure him a right so to defend as to deny the State a chance to check the truth of his position. [ Id. at 434 , 555 A. 2d 575 (quoting State v. Angeleri, 51 N.J. 382, 385 , 241 A. 2d 3 (1968)).] In State v. Sutton, 237 N.J.Super. 221, 225 , 567 A. 2d 272 (App.Div.1989), the State sought to rely on the Court's opinion in Irving . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences2008The Court addressed a related discovery issue in State v. Williams, 80 N.J. 472 , 404 A.2d 34 (1979). 2008The Court addressed a related discovery issue in State v. Williams, 80 N.J. 472 , 404 A.2d 34 (1979). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
In Re WINSHIP
green
2 sentences2005Where one party has at stake an interest of transcending valueas a criminal defendant his libertythis margin of error is reduced as to him by the process of placing on the other party the burden * * * of persuading the fact-finder at the conclusion of the trial of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.' In this context, I view the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal case as bottomed on a fundamental value determination of our society that it is far worse to convict an innocent man than to let a guilty man go free. [ 397 U.S. at 372 , 90 S.Ct. at 1076-77 , 25 L.Ed. 2d a 2005Where one party has at stake an interest of transcending valueas a criminal defendant his libertythis margin of error is reduced as to him by the process of placing on the other party the burden * * * of persuading the fact-finder at the conclusion of the trial of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.' In this context, I view the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal case as bottomed on a fundamental value determination of our society that it is far worse to convict an innocent man than to let a guilty man go free. [ 397 U.S. at 372 , 90 S.Ct. at 1076-77 , 25 L.Ed. 2d a | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Ortisi
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 512 , 608 A. 2d 317 . [ State v. Ortisi, 308 N.J.Super. 573, 587-88 , 706 A. 2d 300 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 383 , 718 A. 2d 1212 (1998).] Waiver of the right to counsel "depends in each case `upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.'" Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482 , 101 S.Ct. 1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 378, 385 (1981) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461, 1466 (1938)). 2003Id. at 512 , 608 A. 2d 317 . [ State v. Ortisi, 308 N.J.Super. 573, 587-88 , 706 A. 2d 300 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 383 , 718 A. 2d 1212 (1998).] Waiver of the right to counsel "depends in each case `upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.'" Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482 , 101 S.Ct. 1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 378, 385 (1981) (quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461, 1466 (1938)). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Housing Authority v. Suydam Investors, LLC
green
1 sentence2003Instead, the Committee indicated that a governmental condemnor could “avoid the consequences of the doctrine by moving to sever and reserve a particular claim, and this would be an appropriate way to handle contamination issues.” Ibid. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Horton
green
2 sentences2001Relying on State v. Horton, 331 N.J.Super. 92 , 751 A. 2d 141 (App.Div.2000), the judge allowed defendant to withdraw his plea. 2001Relying on State v. Horton, 331 N.J.Super. 92 , 751 A. 2d 141 (App.Div.2000), the judge allowed defendant to withdraw his plea. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State ex rel. J.M.
green
2 sentences1997The above reasoning is particularly applicable to this case where “the sanction would be harsh if he is convicted as an adult of the two weapons offenses ... mandatory imprisonment of three years or one-third of his custodial sentence, whichever is greater pursuant to the Graves Act N.J.S.A 2C:43-6c.” State in the Interest of J.M., 222 N.J.Super. 597, 601 , 537 A.2d 771 (App.Div.1988). 1997The above reasoning is particularly applicable to this case where “the sanction would be harsh if he is convicted as an adult of the two weapons offenses ... mandatory imprisonment of three years or one-third of his custodial sentence, whichever is greater pursuant to the Graves Act N.J.S.A 2C:43-6c.” State in the Interest of J.M., 222 N.J.Super. 597, 601 , 537 A.2d 771 (App.Div.1988). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Fritz
green
2 sentences1997The attorney’s conduct “so undermined the proper function of the adversarial process that the hearing cannot be relied on as having produced a just result and that counsel’s performance has been so deficient as to create a reasonable probability that these deficiencies materially contributed to defendant’s waiver to adult court.” State v. Ferguson, supra, 255 N.J.Super. at 544 , 605 A.2d 765 , citing State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 , 519 A.2d 336 (1987). 1997The attorney’s conduct “so undermined the proper function of the adversarial process that the hearing cannot be relied on as having produced a just result and that counsel’s performance has been so deficient as to create a reasonable probability that these deficiencies materially contributed to defendant’s waiver to adult court.” State v. Ferguson, supra, 255 N.J.Super. at 544 , 605 A.2d 765 , citing State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 , 519 A.2d 336 (1987). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Ferguson
green
2 sentences1997The attorney’s conduct “so undermined the proper function of the adversarial process that the hearing cannot be relied on as having produced a just result and that counsel’s performance has been so deficient as to create a reasonable probability that these deficiencies materially contributed to defendant’s waiver to adult court.” State v. Ferguson, supra, 255 N.J.Super. at 544 , 605 A.2d 765 , citing State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 , 519 A.2d 336 (1987). 1997The attorney’s conduct “so undermined the proper function of the adversarial process that the hearing cannot be relied on as having produced a just result and that counsel’s performance has been so deficient as to create a reasonable probability that these deficiencies materially contributed to defendant’s waiver to adult court.” State v. Ferguson, supra, 255 N.J.Super. at 544 , 605 A.2d 765 , citing State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 , 519 A.2d 336 (1987). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Addington v. Texas green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Williams v. Florida green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Miller green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| State v. Davis green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| State v. Mirault green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| People v. Duchin green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| People Ex Rel. Brady v. . Martin neutral | 1 | 1954–1954 |
| People Ex Rel. Tuck v. . French neutral | 1 | 1954–1954 |
| Matter of Eberle v. Laguardia green | 1 | 1954–1954 |
| Bloch v. Brown green | 1 | 1951–1951 |
| Neuchatel Asphalte Co. v. Mayor of New York green | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.