Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
61 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1939–2026 14 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pindergreen2 sentences2002See State v. Pinder, 250 Conn. 385, 425-26 , 736 A.2d 857 (1999). 2002See State v. Pinder, 250 Conn. 385, 425-26 , 736 A.2d 857 (1999). | 5 | 5 |
State v. Cowardgreen2 sentences2024Second, ‘‘we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.’’ State v. Coward, 292 Conn. 296, 307 , 972 A.2d 691 (2009). 2024Second, ‘‘we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.’’ State v. Coward, 292 Conn. 296, 307 , 972 A.2d 691 (2009). | 1 | 9 |
Faretta v. Californiagreen2 sentences2017See, e.g., Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 819-20, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (the sixth amendment "grants to the accused personally the right to make his defense ... for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails"); State v. Bonilla , 317 Conn. 758 , 772, 120 A.3d 481 (2015) ("[o]ur well established approach to jury instructions and defenses respects the defendant's right to control the conduct of his own defense" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); State v. Peeler , 265 Conn. 460 , 470, 828 A.2d 1216 (2003) (observing that "a primary purpose of the sixth a 2017See, e.g., Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 819-20, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (the sixth amendment "grants to the accused personally the right to make his defense ... for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails"); State v. Bonilla , 317 Conn. 758 , 772, 120 A.3d 481 (2015) ("[o]ur well established approach to jury instructions and defenses respects the defendant's right to control the conduct of his own defense" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); State v. Peeler , 265 Conn. 460 , 470, 828 A.2d 1216 (2003) (observing that "a primary purpose of the sixth a | 1 | 2 |
State v. Whitakergreen2 sentences2025Although the defendant’s prior encounters with the criminal justice system should be given less weight than if he had been an adult, we disagree with any suggestion that his thirteen prior arrests and at least eleven prior Miranda warnings are entitled to no weight.12 See Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 726 , 99 S. Ct. 2560 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 197 (1979) (holding that sixteen year old defendant understood nature of his waiver given his ‘‘considerable experience with the police’’); State v. Whitaker, 215 Conn. 739, 754, 758 , 578 A.2d 1031 (1990) (considering fact that juvenile defendant had prior 2025Although the defendant’s prior encounters with the criminal justice system should be given less weight than if he had been an adult, we disagree with any suggestion that his thirteen prior arrests and at least eleven prior Miranda warnings are entitled to no weight.12 See Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 726 , 99 S. Ct. 2560 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 197 (1979) (holding that sixteen year old defendant understood nature of his waiver given his ‘‘considerable experience with the police’’); State v. Whitaker, 215 Conn. 739, 754, 758 , 578 A.2d 1031 (1990) (considering fact that juvenile defendant had prior | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Kitchensgreen | 1 | 1 |
Moreno v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Moreover, by concluding that [a] mere failure to object to an improper instruction constitutes a waiver of the defendant's appellate rights, the [defendant is] essentially single [d] ... out to bear the consequences of the error despite the equal obligations [of] the trial court and the [state] to identify and to correct the error." (Emphasis omitted.) Id., at 518-19, 10 A.3d 942 ( Katz , J. , concurring); see also Moreno v. State , 341 P.3d 1134 , 1146 (Alaska 2015) ("[w]hether the defendant made a tactical decision not to object or intelligently waived an opportunity to object must be plainl 2016More- over, by concluding that [a] mere failure to object to an improper instruction constitutes a waiver of the defendant’s appellate rights, the [defendant is] essen- tially single[d] . . . out to bear the consequences of the error despite the equal obligations [of] the trial court and the [state] to identify and to correct the error.’’ (Emphasis omitted.) Id., 518-19 (Katz, J., concurring); see also Moreno v. State, 341 P.3d 1134, 1146 (Alaska 2015) (‘‘[w]hether the defendant made a tactical deci- sion not to object or intelligently waived an opportunity to object must be plainly obvious fr | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Manuel Delgadogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Commissioner of Correction
green
2 sentences2013Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Crawford v. Commissioner of Correction, 294 Conn. 165, 205 , 982 A.2d 620 (2009). 2013Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Crawford v. Commissioner of Correction, 294 Conn. 165, 205 , 982 A.2d 620 (2009). | 8 | 2010–2013 |
State v. Faraday
green
2 sentences2024The entry of a guilty plea under the Alford doctrine carries the same consequences as a standard plea of guilty.’’ (Citation omitted; emphasis in original; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Faraday, 268 Conn. 174 , 204-205, 842 A.2d 567 (2004). 4 The habeas trial transcript contains multiple spelling variations of Romowi’s last name. 2024The entry of a guilty plea under the Alford doctrine carries the same consequences as a standard plea of guilty.’’ (Citation omitted; emphasis in original; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Faraday, 268 Conn. 174 , 204-205, 842 A.2d 567 (2004). 4 The habeas trial transcript contains multiple spelling variations of Romowi’s last name. | 5 | 2016–2025 |
In re Sydnei V.
green
2 sentences2026Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Sydnei V., 168 Conn. App. 538 , 562-64, 147 A.3d 147 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 903 , 151 A.3d 1289 (2016). 2026Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Sydnei V., 168 Conn. App. 538 , 562-64, 147 A.3d 147 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 903 , 151 A.3d 1289 (2016). | 4 | 2017–2026 |
In re Sydnei V.
green
2 sentences2026Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Sydnei V., 168 Conn. App. 538 , 562-64, 147 A.3d 147 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 903 , 151 A.3d 1289 (2016). 2026Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Sydnei V., 168 Conn. App. 538 , 562-64, 147 A.3d 147 , cert. denied, 324 Conn. 903 , 151 A.3d 1289 (2016). | 4 | 2017–2026 |
State v. Simpson
green
2 sentences2022By entering such a plea, a defendant may be able to avoid formally admitting guilt at the time of sentencing, but he nonetheless consents to being treated as if he were guilty with no assurances to the contrary.’’ (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Simpson, 329 Conn. 820 , 824 n.4, 189 A.3d 1215 (2018). 9 Around the same time that this guilty plea was entered, in a separate criminal case, the petitioner also pleaded guilty under the Alford doctrine to possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes (Supp. 2014) § 21a-279 (a), arising from an incident in Man 2022By entering such a plea, a defendant may be able to avoid formally admitting guilt at the time of sentencing, but he nonetheless consents to being treated as if he were guilty with no assurances to the contrary.’’ (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Simpson, 329 Conn. 820 , 824 n.4, 189 A.3d 1215 (2018). 9 Around the same time that this guilty plea was entered, in a separate criminal case, the petitioner also pleaded guilty under the Alford doctrine to possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes (Supp. 2014) § 21a-279 (a), arising from an incident in Man | 4 | 2021–2022 |
Dechellis v. Dechellis
green
2 sentences2021Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) DeChellis v. DeChellis, 190 Conn. App. 853, 866 , 213 A.3d 1 , cert. denied, 333 Conn. 913 , 215 A.3d 1210 (2019). 2021Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) DeChellis v. DeChellis, 190 Conn. App. 853, 866 , 213 A.3d 1 , cert. denied, 333 Conn. 913 , 215 A.3d 1210 (2019). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Ruocco
green
2 sentences2019Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ruocco, 151 Conn. App. 732 , 739-40, 95 A.3d 573 (2014), aff’d, 322 Conn. 796 , 144 A.3d 354 (2016). 2019Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ruocco, 151 Conn. App. 732 , 739-40, 95 A.3d 573 (2014), aff’d, 322 Conn. 796 , 144 A.3d 354 (2016). | 2 | 2015–2019 |
Clougherty v. Clougherty
green
2 sentences2019Because [a] party cannot prevail under plain error unless it has demonstrated that the failure to grant relief will result in manifest injustice ... under the second prong of the analysis we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust." (Citations omitted; emphasis omitted; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Clougherty v. Clougherty , 131 Conn. App. 270 , 273-74, 26 A.3d 704 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 948 , 31 A.3d 383 (2011). 2019Because [a] party cannot prevail under plain error unless it has demonstrated that the failure to grant relief will result in manifest injustice ... under the second prong of the analysis we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust." (Citations omitted; emphasis omitted; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Clougherty v. Clougherty , 131 Conn. App. 270 , 273-74, 26 A.3d 704 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 948 , 31 A.3d 383 (2011). | 2 | 2014–2019 |
HSBC BANK USA v. Navin
green
2 sentences2019Because [a] party cannot prevail under plain error unless it has demonstrated that the failure to grant relief will result in manifest injustice ... under the second prong of the analysis we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust." (Citations omitted; emphasis omitted; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Clougherty v. Clougherty , 131 Conn. App. 270 , 273-74, 26 A.3d 704 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 948 , 31 A.3d 383 (2011). 2014Because [a] party cannot prevail under plain error unless it has demonstrated that the failure to grant relief will result in manifest injustice . . . under the second prong of the analysis we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.” (Citations omitted; emphasis omitted; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Clougherty v. Clougherty, 131 Conn. App. 270, 273-74 , 26 A.3d 704 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 948 , 31 A.3d 838 (2011). | 2 | 2014–2019 |
In re Juvenile Appeal (85-AB)
green
2 sentences1994Nonetheless, we stated: “ ‘Vindication at the appellate level can seldom regain all that has been lost by an erroneous deter mination of a cause in the trial court.’ In re Juvenile Appeal (85-AB), 195 Conn. 303, 311 , 488 A.2d 778 (1985).” Id. 1994Nonetheless, we stated: “ ‘Vindication at the appellate level can seldom regain all that has been lost by an erroneous deter mination of a cause in the trial court.’ In re Juvenile Appeal (85-AB), 195 Conn. 303, 311 , 488 A.2d 778 (1985).” Id. | 2 | 1987–1994 |
State v. Police
green
2 sentences2026Second, we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Daren Y., 350 Conn. 393 , 405-406, 324 A.3d 734 (2024). 2026Second, we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Daren Y., 350 Conn. 393 , 405-406, 324 A.3d 734 (2024). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Glen S. v. Commissioner of Correction
green
2 sentences2026The entry of a guilty plea under the Alford doctrine carries the same consequences as a standard plea of guilty.” (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Glen S. v. Commissioner of Correction, 223 Conn. App. 152 , 155 n.3, 307 A.3d 951 , cert. denied, 348 Conn. 951 , 308 A.3d 1038 (2024). 2026The entry of a guilty plea under the Alford doctrine carries the same consequences as a standard plea of guilty.” (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Glen S. v. Commissioner of Correction, 223 Conn. App. 152 , 155 n.3, 307 A.3d 951 , cert. denied, 348 Conn. 951 , 308 A.3d 1038 (2024). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Daren Y.
green
2 sentences2026Second, we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Daren Y., 350 Conn. 393 , 405-406, 324 A.3d 734 (2024). 2026Second, we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Daren Y., 350 Conn. 393 , 405-406, 324 A.3d 734 (2024). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Fare v. Michael C.
green
2 sentences2025Although the defendant’s prior encounters with the criminal justice system should be given less weight than if he had been an adult, we disagree with any suggestion that his thirteen prior arrests and at least eleven prior Miranda warnings are entitled to no weight.12 See Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 726 , 99 S. Ct. 2560 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 197 (1979) (holding that sixteen year old defendant understood nature of his waiver given his ‘‘considerable experience with the police’’); State v. Whitaker, 215 Conn. 739, 754, 758 , 578 A.2d 1031 (1990) (considering fact that juvenile defendant had prior 2025Although the defendant’s prior encounters with the criminal justice system should be given less weight than if he had been an adult, we disagree with any suggestion that his thirteen prior arrests and at least eleven prior Miranda warnings are entitled to no weight.12 See Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 726 , 99 S. Ct. 2560 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 197 (1979) (holding that sixteen year old defendant understood nature of his waiver given his ‘‘considerable experience with the police’’); State v. Whitaker, 215 Conn. 739, 754, 758 , 578 A.2d 1031 (1990) (considering fact that juvenile defendant had prior | 1 | 2025–2025 |
O'Brien v. O'Brien
green
2 sentences2019To hold otherwise would shift the cost of the violation to the innocent party." O'Brien v. O'Brien , supra, 326 Conn. at 101 , 161 A.3d 1236 . 2019To hold otherwise would shift the cost of the violation to the innocent party." O'Brien v. O'Brien , supra, 326 Conn. at 101 , 161 A.3d 1236 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Allan
green
1 sentence2019Because [a] party cannot prevail under plain error unless it has demonstrated that the failure to grant relief will result in manifest injustice ... under the second prong of the analysis we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust." (Citations omitted; emphasis omitted; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Clougherty v. Clougherty , 131 Conn. App. 270 , 273-74, 26 A.3d 704 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 948 , 31 A.3d 383 (2011). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Healey v. Haymond Law Firm, P.C.
green
2 sentences2018Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief." (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Healey v. Haymond Law Firm, P.C. , 174 Conn. App. 230 , 245, 166 A.3d 10 (2017). 2018Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief." (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Healey v. Haymond Law Firm, P.C. , 174 Conn. App. 230 , 245, 166 A.3d 10 (2017). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Padua
green
2 sentences2018In State v. Padua , supra, 273 Conn. at 164 -65 , 869 A.2d 192 , for example, our Supreme Court considered a case in which conspiracy to sell marijuana within 1500 feet of a public housing project was alleged, and the trial court had not instructed that, in order to find the defendant guilty, the jury had to find that he agreed to commit the crime within 1500 feet of a public housing project. 8 Our Supreme Court held that, although the instruction was improper, the error was harmless in light of overwhelming evidence regarding intent to sell marijuana within 1500 feet of a public housing proje 2018In State v. Padua , supra, 273 Conn. at 164 -65 , 869 A.2d 192 , for example, our Supreme Court considered a case in which conspiracy to sell marijuana within 1500 feet of a public housing project was alleged, and the trial court had not instructed that, in order to find the defendant guilty, the jury had to find that he agreed to commit the crime within 1500 feet of a public housing project. 8 Our Supreme Court held that, although the instruction was improper, the error was harmless in light of overwhelming evidence regarding intent to sell marijuana within 1500 feet of a public housing proje | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Fine v. Commissioner of Correction
green
2 sentences2017The habeas court granted the motion, but the Appellate Court reversed, concluding that the respondent had failed to make "an affirmative showing that, at the time of the withdrawal, the petitioner was apprised of and understood the right being waived and the consequences of his waiver." Id., at 147-48 , 81 A.3d 1209 . 2017The habeas court granted the motion, but the Appellate Court reversed, concluding that the respondent had failed to make "an affirmative showing that, at the time of the withdrawal, the petitioner was apprised of and understood the right being waived and the consequences of his waiver." Id., at 147-48 , 81 A.3d 1209 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In re Jah'za G.
green
2 sentences2017Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief." (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Jah'za G. , 141 Conn.App. 15 , 22, 60 A.3d 392 , cert. denied, 308 Conn. 926 , 64 A.3d 329 (2013). 2017Only if both prongs of the analysis are satisfied can the appealing party obtain relief." (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Jah'za G. , 141 Conn.App. 15 , 22, 60 A.3d 392 , cert. denied, 308 Conn. 926 , 64 A.3d 329 (2013). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Connecticut v. Peeler
green
2 sentences2017See, e.g., Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 819-20, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (the sixth amendment "grants to the accused personally the right to make his defense ... for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails"); State v. Bonilla , 317 Conn. 758 , 772, 120 A.3d 481 (2015) ("[o]ur well established approach to jury instructions and defenses respects the defendant's right to control the conduct of his own defense" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); State v. Peeler , 265 Conn. 460 , 470, 828 A.2d 1216 (2003) (observing that "a primary purpose of the sixth a 2017See, e.g., Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 819-20, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (the sixth amendment "grants to the accused personally the right to make his defense ... for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails"); State v. Bonilla , 317 Conn. 758 , 772, 120 A.3d 481 (2015) ("[o]ur well established approach to jury instructions and defenses respects the defendant's right to control the conduct of his own defense" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); State v. Peeler , 265 Conn. 460 , 470, 828 A.2d 1216 (2003) (observing that "a primary purpose of the sixth a | 1 | 2017–2017 |
County of Okanogan, Washington v. National Marine Fisheries Service
green
1 sentence2017See, e.g., Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 819-20, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (the sixth amendment "grants to the accused personally the right to make his defense ... for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails"); State v. Bonilla , 317 Conn. 758 , 772, 120 A.3d 481 (2015) ("[o]ur well established approach to jury instructions and defenses respects the defendant's right to control the conduct of his own defense" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); State v. Peeler , 265 Conn. 460 , 470, 828 A.2d 1216 (2003) (observing that "a primary purpose of the sixth a | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Whelan
green
2 sentences2017In State v. Whelan , supra, 200 Conn. at 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , our Supreme Court determined that an out-of-court statement is admissible as substantive evidence if (1) the statement is a prior inconsistent statement, (2) it is signed by the declarant, (3) the declarant has personal knowledge of the facts stated therein, and (4) the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination. 2017In State v. Whelan , supra, 200 Conn. at 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , our Supreme Court determined that an out-of-court statement is admissible as substantive evidence if (1) the statement is a prior inconsistent statement, (2) it is signed by the declarant, (3) the declarant has personal knowledge of the facts stated therein, and (4) the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Peeler
green
2 sentences2017See, e.g., Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 819-20, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (the sixth amendment "grants to the accused personally the right to make his defense ... for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails"); State v. Bonilla , 317 Conn. 758 , 772, 120 A.3d 481 (2015) ("[o]ur well established approach to jury instructions and defenses respects the defendant's right to control the conduct of his own defense" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); State v. Peeler , 265 Conn. 460 , 470, 828 A.2d 1216 (2003) (observing that "a primary purpose of the sixth a 2017See, e.g., Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 819-20, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (the sixth amendment "grants to the accused personally the right to make his defense ... for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails"); State v. Bonilla , 317 Conn. 758 , 772, 120 A.3d 481 (2015) ("[o]ur well established approach to jury instructions and defenses respects the defendant's right to control the conduct of his own defense" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); State v. Peeler , 265 Conn. 460 , 470, 828 A.2d 1216 (2003) (observing that "a primary purpose of the sixth a | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. DARRYL W.
green
2 sentences2017Rather, the party seeking plain error review must demonstrate that the claimed impropriety was so clear, obvious and indisputable as to warrant the extraordinary remedy of reversal." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Darryl W. , 303 Conn. 353 , 371-73, 33 A.3d 239 (2012). "[U]nder the second prong of the analysis we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.... 2017Rather, the party seeking plain error review must demonstrate that the claimed impropriety was so clear, obvious and indisputable as to warrant the extraordinary remedy of reversal." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Darryl W. , 303 Conn. 353 , 371-73, 33 A.3d 239 (2012). "[U]nder the second prong of the analysis we must determine whether the consequences of the error are so grievous as to be fundamentally unfair or manifestly unjust.... | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Zuberi v. Commissioner of Correction green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| State v. Gojcaj neutral | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| State v. Davenport green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| State v. Davenport neutral | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Weber v. Muzio green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Melia v. Hartford Fire Insurance green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Ostroski green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| State v. Childree green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Brady v. United States green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Miranda v. Arizona green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Preferred Accident Insurance v. Musante, Berman & Steinberg Co. green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| Blydenburgh v. Miles neutral | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.