consequences rule (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

consequences rule in Idaho

16 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1929–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Mallery v. Lewisgreen
idaho · 1983 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018See Mallery v. Lewis, 106 Idaho 227, 234 , 678 P.2d 19, 26 (1983) (holding that absent the “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception to the mootness doctrine, pretrial detainees would not be afforded appellate review because detention for pretrial detainees averaged six to eight months). 2 violated the terms of probation, the second question is what should be the consequences of that violation.

2018See Mallery v. Lewis, 106 Idaho 227, 234 , 678 P.2d 19, 26 (1983) (holding that absent the “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception to the mootness doctrine, pretrial detainees would not be afforded appellate review because detention for pretrial detainees averaged six to eight months). 2 violated the terms of probation, the second question is what should be the consequences of that violation.

11
State v. Maxeygreen
idahoctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994State v. Maxey, 125 Idaho 516, 518 , 873 P.2d 161, 164 (Ct.App.1993).

1994State v. Maxey, 125 Idaho 516, 518 , 873 P.2d 161, 164 (Ct.App.1993).

11
State v. Claytongreen
idaho · 1980 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993In State v. Clayton, 100 Idaho 896, 897 , 606 P.2d 1000, 1001 (1980), our Supreme Court cited section 19-857, as well as Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), for the rule that inasmuch as a defendant’s decision to reject court appointed counsel and conduct his own defense amounts to a waiver of the right to counsel, the “defendant should be made aware of the problems inherent in self-representation so that such waiver is knowingly and intelligently made.” In State v. Ruth, 102 Idaho 638 , 637 P.2d 415 (1981), the Court cited both Faretta and Clayton for

1993In State v. Clayton, 100 Idaho 896, 897 , 606 P.2d 1000, 1001 (1980), our Supreme Court cited section 19-857, as well as Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), for the rule that inasmuch as a defendant’s decision to reject court appointed counsel and conduct his own defense amounts to a waiver of the right to counsel, the “defendant should be made aware of the problems inherent in self-representation so that such waiver is knowingly and intelligently made.” In State v. Ruth, 102 Idaho 638 , 637 P.2d 415 (1981), the Court cited both Faretta and Clayton for

11
State v. Monroegreen
idaho · 1982 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
2 sentences

1989State v. Monroe, 103 Idaho 129, 130 , 645 P.2d 363, 364 (1982); Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981).

1989State v. Monroe, 103 Idaho 129, 130 , 645 P.2d 363, 364 (1982); Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (20)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Knutsen green
idahoctapp · 2003
2 sentences

2017Id.

2017Id.

42009–2017
Faretta v. California green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

2010In Faretta , the Supreme Court found that the right to self-representation is implied by the structure of the Sixth Amendment: “The right to defend is given directly to the accused; for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails.” 422 U.S. at 819-20 , 95 S.Ct. at 2533 , 45 L.Ed.2d at 572-73 .

2010In Faretta , the Supreme Court found that the right to self-representation is implied by the structure of the Sixth Amendment: “The right to defend is given directly to the accused; for it is he who suffers the consequences if the defense fails.” 422 U.S. at 819-20 , 95 S.Ct. at 2533 , 45 L.Ed.2d at 572-73 .

31993–2010
Satterwhite v. Texas green
scotus · 1988
2 sentences

1990The Court in Satterwhite recognized that “the evaluation of the consequences of our error in the sentencing phase of a capital case may be more difficult because of the discretion that is given to the sentencer.” Id., 108 S.Ct. at 1798.

1990The Court in Satterwhite recognized that "the evaluation of the consequences of our error in the sentencing phase of a capital case may be more difficult because of the discretion that is given to the sentencer." Id., 108 S.Ct. at 1798.

21989–1990
State v. Coby green
idaho · 1996
2 sentences

2004In State v. Coby, 128 Idaho 90 , 910 P.2d 762 (1996), a post-Custis decision, the trial court granted Goby’s motion to reduce his felony DUI charge on the basis that the State failed to present evidence that Coby was informed of the dangers of self-representation or that Coby understood the consequences of his waiver of counsel.

2004In State v. Coby, 128 Idaho 90 , 910 P.2d 762 (1996), a post-Custis decision, the trial court granted Goby’s motion to reduce his felony DUI charge on the basis that the State failed to present evidence that Coby was informed of the dangers of self-representation or that Coby understood the consequences of his waiver of counsel.

12004–2004
Neder v. United States green
scotus · 1999
1 sentence

2003Id.

12003–2003
State v. Ruth green
idaho · 1981
2 sentences

1993In State v. Clayton, 100 Idaho 896, 897 , 606 P.2d 1000, 1001 (1980), our Supreme Court cited section 19-857, as well as Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), for the rule that inasmuch as a defendant’s decision to reject court appointed counsel and conduct his own defense amounts to a waiver of the right to counsel, the “defendant should be made aware of the problems inherent in self-representation so that such waiver is knowingly and intelligently made.” In State v. Ruth, 102 Idaho 638 , 637 P.2d 415 (1981), the Court cited both Faretta and Clayton for

1993In State v. Clayton, 100 Idaho 896, 897 , 606 P.2d 1000, 1001 (1980), our Supreme Court cited section 19-857, as well as Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), for the rule that inasmuch as a defendant’s decision to reject court appointed counsel and conduct his own defense amounts to a waiver of the right to counsel, the “defendant should be made aware of the problems inherent in self-representation so that such waiver is knowingly and intelligently made.” In State v. Ruth, 102 Idaho 638 , 637 P.2d 415 (1981), the Court cited both Faretta and Clayton for

11993–1993
Edwards v. Arizona green
scotus · 1981
2 sentences

1989State v. Monroe, 103 Idaho 129, 130 , 645 P.2d 363, 364 (1982); Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981).

1989State v. Monroe, 103 Idaho 129, 130 , 645 P.2d 363, 364 (1982); Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981).

11989–1989
Chapman v. California red
scotus · 1967
2 sentences

1989The question ... is not whether the legally admitted evidence was sufficient to support the death sentence, which we assume it was, but rather, whether the State has proved "beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained." ( Citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 828 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967).) 486 U.S. at ___, 108 S.Ct. at 1798, 100 L.Ed.2d at 290 .

1989The question ... is not whether the legally admitted evidence was sufficient to support the death sentence, which we assume it was, but rather, whether the State has proved "beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained." ( Citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 828 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967).) 486 U.S. at ___, 108 S.Ct. at 1798, 100 L.Ed.2d at 290 .

11989–1989
Durant v. Snyder green
idaho · 1944
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Elliott v. Craig green
idaho · 1927
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Shepherd v. Dougan green
· 1937
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Points v. Turner neutral
· 1924
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co. green
idaho · 1939
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Hancock v. Elkington green
· 1947
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Burnham v. Henderson green
· 1929
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen green
· 1939
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Knudsen v. Lythman green
idaho · 1920
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Childs v. Reed green
idaho · 1921
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
McKinney v. Merritt green
· 1922
2 sentences

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

1958Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 ; Burnham v. Henderson, 47 Idaho 687 , 278 P. 221 ; Shepherd v. Dougan, 58 Idaho 543 , 76 P.2d 442 ; Intermountain Realty Co. v. Allen, 60 Idaho 228 , 90 P.2d 704 , 122 A.L.R. 647 ; Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co., 60 Idaho 662 , 95 P.2d 833 ; Durant v. Snyder, 65 Idaho 678 , 151 P.2d 776 ; Hancock v. Elkington, 67 Idaho 542 , 186 P.2d 494 .” In the case of Knudsen v. Lythman, 33 Idaho 794 , 200 P. 130, 132 , this Court sa

11958–1958
Zimmerman v. Brown green
· 1917
2 sentences

1929J., p. 423; Zimmerman v. Brown, 30 Ida. 640 , 166 Pac. 924 .) The consequences of its violation are: (1) Punishment by fine; (2) a rule of evidence, which is that failure to file the certificate shall be prima facie evidence of fraud in securing credit; and (3) inability to maintain a suit.

1929J., p. 423; Zimmerman v. Brown, 30 Ida. 640 , 166 Pac. 924 .) The consequences of its violation are: (1) Punishment by fine; (2) a rule of evidence, which is that failure to file the certificate shall be prima facie evidence of fraud in securing credit; and (3) inability to maintain a suit.

11929–1929

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 18-8005 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 193 (1888–2026) TX 129 (1893–2025) CA 98 (1871–2025) IL 90 (1932–2026) TN 67 (1872–2026) OH 67 (1990–2026) CT 58 (1939–2026) FL 44 (1910–2026) PA 41 (1906–2024) NC 38 (1943–2021) MN 37 (1979–2026) NJ 35 (1903–2024) MA 30 (1906–2025) MI 26 (1932–2018) WA 25 (1940–2021) MD 24 (1903–2021) LA 23 (1905–2025) IN 20 (1890–2019) WV 17 (1885–2020) UT 17 (1897–2024) IA 16 (1883–2018) KY 16 (1912–2024) AL 16 (1983–2017) ID 16 (1929–2018) KS 15 (1907–2024) VT 15 (1848–2017) OK 13 (1948–2010) HI 13 (1981–2018) RI 12 (1976–2025) OR 12 (1914–2022) AZ 12 (1969–2024) NM 12 (1938–2023) SC 10 (1964–2023) MO 10 (1907–2011) GA 10 (1914–2020) CO 9 (1985–2012) ME 9 (1917–1995) WI 9 (1901–2024) DC 9 (1982–2015) DE 9 (1948–2025) MS 7 (1940–2022) NV 6 (1910–2017) NE 6 (1902–2017) ND 4 (1897–2015) AR 4 (1886–2017) MT 4 (1895–2024) WY 3 (1992–2002) SD 3 (1986–2004) AK 2 (1977–1984) PR 2 (1963–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check