Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Clegggreen2 sentences2025This highly deferential standard requires an appellate court to “consider whether the trial court’s ruling regarding [a] defendant’s Batson challenge was clearly erroneous.” State v. Clegg, 380 N.C. 127 , 140, 867 S.E.2d 885 , 897 (2022). 2025This highly deferential standard requires an appellate court to “consider whether the trial court’s ruling regarding [a] defendant’s Batson challenge was clearly erroneous.” State v. Clegg, 380 N.C. 127 , 140, 867 S.E.2d 885 , 897 (2022). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence2024See Smith, 352 N.C. at 557 . b. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bonneygreen2 sentences2023Analysis A mistrial is proper “when there are improprieties in the trial so serious that they substantially and irreparably prejudice the defendant’s case and make it impossible for the defendant to receive a fair and impartial verdict.” State v. Bonney, 329 N.C. 61, 73 , 405 S.E.2d 145, 152 (1991) (citation and quotation marks omitted). 2023Analysis A mistrial is proper “when there are improprieties in the trial so serious that they substantially and irreparably prejudice the defendant’s case and make it impossible for the defendant to receive a fair and impartial verdict.” State v. Bonney, 329 N.C. 61, 73 , 405 S.E.2d 145, 152 (1991) (citation and quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dayegreen2 sentences2023This is a highly deferential standard, as the trial court’s “ruling thereon (without findings of fact) is not reviewable without a showing of gross abuse of discretion.” State v. Daye, 281 N.C. 592, 596 , 189 S.E.2d 481, 483 (1972). 2. 2023This is a highly deferential standard, as the trial court’s “ruling thereon (without findings of fact) is not reviewable without a showing of gross abuse of discretion.” State v. Daye, 281 N.C. 592, 596 , 189 S.E.2d 481, 483 (1972). 2. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In the Matter of Yocum
green
1 sentence2015The trial court's "ruling on the qualifications of an expert or the admissibility of an expert's opinion will not be reversed on appeal absent a showing of abuse of discretion." Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.
red
2 sentences2015Again, under the highly deferential standard of review applicable to these evidentiary rulings, we must reject Kearney's argument. "[T]rial courts are afforded a wide latitude of discretion when making a determination about the admissibility of expert testimony." Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd., 358 N.C. 440 , 458, 597 S.E.2d 674 , 686 (2004) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2015Again, under the highly deferential standard of review applicable to these evidentiary rulings, we must reject Kearney's argument. "[T]rial courts are afforded a wide latitude of discretion when making a determination about the admissibility of expert testimony." Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd., 358 N.C. 440 , 458, 597 S.E.2d 674 , 686 (2004) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
General Electric Co. v. Joiner
green
1 sentence2014Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.