167 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1939–2025 14 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State D. of Trans. & Dev. v. Estate of Clarkgreen2 sentences1996R.S. 48:453; State Dept. of Trans. & Dev. v. Estate of Clark, 432 So.2d 405, 408 (La. 1994See, e.g., Dietrich, supra, 555 So.2d at 1359 ; State, Dept. of Highways v. McPherson, 261 La. 116 , 259 So.2d 33, 38 (1972); Rapier, supra, 164 So.2d at 282 ("[T]he landowner bears the burden of proving his claim for additional compensation to a legal certainty and by a preponderance of the evidence."); State Through Dept. of Highways v. Levy, 242 La. 259 , 136 So.2d 35, 43 (1961); State, Dept. of Transp. and Dev. v. Clark's Estate, 432 So.2d 405, 408 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983) ("The burden imposed upon the person having his property expropriated is to establish his claims to a legal certainty an | 6 | 7 |
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Levygreen2 sentences1994See, e.g., Dietrich, supra, 555 So.2d at 1359 ; State, Dept. of Highways v. McPherson, 261 La. 116 , 259 So.2d 33, 38 (1972); Rapier, supra, 164 So.2d at 282 ("[T]he landowner bears the burden of proving his claim for additional compensation to a legal certainty and by a preponderance of the evidence."); State Through Dept. of Highways v. Levy, 242 La. 259 , 136 So.2d 35, 43 (1961); State, Dept. of Transp. and Dev. v. Clark's Estate, 432 So.2d 405, 408 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983) ("The burden imposed upon the person having his property expropriated is to establish his claims to a legal certainty an 1994See, e.g., Dietrich, supra, 555 So.2d at 1359 ; State, Dept. of Highways v. McPherson, 261 La. 116 , 259 So.2d 33, 38 (1972); Rapier, supra, 164 So.2d at 282 ("[T]he landowner bears the burden of proving his claim for additional compensation to a legal certainty and by a preponderance of the evidence."); State Through Dept. of Highways v. Levy, 242 La. 259 , 136 So.2d 35, 43 (1961); State, Dept. of Transp. and Dev. v. Clark's Estate, 432 So.2d 405, 408 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983) ("The burden imposed upon the person having his property expropriated is to establish his claims to a legal certainty an | 5 | 12 |
Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.green2 sentences1994Bruno v. Harbert International Inc., 593 So.2d 357, 361 (La.1992). 1994Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., 593 So.2d 357, 361 (La.1992). | 4 | 4 |
Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Companygreen2 sentences1999Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 281 So.2d 724, 726 (La.1973). 1992Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, 281 So.2d 724, 726 (La.1973); Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Turner, 582 So.2d 250, 254 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991). | 2 | 5 |
Provident Life and Acc. Ins. v. Turnergreen2 sentences2000Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Turner, 582 So.2d 250, 254 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991). 2000See Provident Life, 582 So.2d at 254 . | 2 | 3 |
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc.green2 sentences2020“Ordinarily, the party pleading the exception of prescription bears the burden of proving the claim has prescribed.” Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 2009-2632, 2009-2635, p. 7 (La. 7/6/10), 45 So.3d 991, 998 . 6 However, when the claim appears prescribed on the face of the pleading, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to establish that prescription was interrupted or suspended, and the claim is not prescribed. 2020“Ordinarily, the party pleading the exception of prescription bears the burden of proving the claim has prescribed.” Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632 (La. 7/6/10), 45 So.3d 991, 998 . | 1 | 19 |
Hebert v. Your Food Processing & Warehouse, Inc.green2 sentences1973Now if he went that far then he would have some of these characteristics and probably most of them that I have just enumerated.” In his written opinion, the trial judge quotes the above testimony of Dr. Booker and then makes the following astute observation : “None of Plaintiff’s co-workers, even Willie Puefory, who worked shoulder to shoulder with Plaintiff, ever observed any of the above objective manifestations, and, in fact, none ever at any time observed anything unusual about Plaintiff’s conduct, behavior or activities.” A workmen’s compensation claimant has the burden of proving his cla 1973Now if he went that far then he would have some of these characteristics and probably most of them that I have just enumerated.” In his written opinion, the trial judge quotes the above testimony of Dr. Booker and then makes the following astute observation : “None of Plaintiff’s co-workers, even Willie Puefory, who worked shoulder to shoulder with Plaintiff, ever observed any of the above objective manifestations, and, in fact, none ever at any time observed anything unusual about Plaintiff’s conduct, behavior or activities.” A workmen’s compensation claimant has the burden of proving his cla | 1 | 4 |
Guillory v. New Amsterdam Casualty Companygreen2 sentences1989Guillory v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 244 La. 225 , 152 So.2d 1, 6 (L.1963). 1989Guillory v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 244 La. 225 , 152 So.2d 1, 6 (L.1963). | 1 | 2 |
| Chumley v. Whitegreen | 1 | 1 |
| 3218 Magazine, L.L.C. v. Lloyds of Londongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Miller v. Leonardgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Leleux v. Viatorgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Frazier v. Freemangreen | 1 | 1 |
| American Bank v. Saxenagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Martin v. Riverview Medical Centergreen | 1 | 1 |
| City of New Orleans v. Giraudgreen | 1 | 1 |
| McLean v. Huntergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Rapiergreen | 1 | 1 |
| STATE, DOTD v. Dietrichgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State, Dept. of Highways v. Trippeer Realty Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| State, Department of Highways v. McPhersongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State Museum
green
2 sentences2024City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La. 3/2/99), 739 So.2d 748, 755 . 2024City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La. 3/2/99), 739 So.2d 748, 755 . | 9 | 2008–2024 |
State v. Rownd
green
2 sentences1967“In either event the defendant has the burden of proving his claim.” (Emphasis Supplied) As a result of the statute the defendant owner must “produce convincing evidence that the value of the property taken is in excess of that shown in the estimate on which the Highway Department has made the deposit.” (See State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. Rownd, La.App., 119 So.2d 282, 288 ; State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. Richard, La.App., 135 So.2d 319, 322 ; State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. Kurtz, La.App., 143 So.2d 761, 769 ) The 1963Applicable in this connection are the comments of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Louisiana, through the Department of Highways v. Ben Levy, 242 La. 259 , 136 So.2d 35 : “ ‘We have no quarrel with defendant’s contentions, but in expropriation matters the defendant has the burden of proving his claim, LSA-R.S. 48:453; State of Louisiana, through the Department of Highways v. Rownd, Jr., [La.App.,] 119 So.2d 282 . | 7 | 1961–1967 |
N. Clark, L.L.C. v. Chisesi
green
2 sentences2022N. Clark, 16-0599, p. 5, 206 So.3d at 1017 (citing Hospitality Consultants, LLC v. Angeron, 09-1738, p. 6 (La. 2020N. Clark, 16-0599, p. 5, 206 So.3d at 1017 (citing Hospitality Consultants, LLC v. Angeron, 09-1738, p. 6 (La. | 3 | 2020–2022 |
Chrysler Corp. v. Doyal
neutral
2 sentences2016Lewis v. Administrator, 540 So.2d at 494-495 , citing Chrysler Corporation v. Doyal, 352 So.2d 322 (La. 1990Chrysler Corp. v. Doyal, 352 So.2d 322 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977). | 3 | 1989–2016 |
Gustin v. Shows
green
2 sentences1999This argument was found meritless by this court in Gustin v. Shows, 377 So.2d 1325 . 1983Rider v. LeCompte, 398 So.2d 114 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1981); Gustin v. Shows, 377 So.2d 1325 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1979). | 3 | 1981–1999 |
STATE, DOTD v. Pace
neutral
2 sentences1996In State, DOTD v. Pace, 588 So.2d 145 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), the court said: In an expropriation case the defendant has the burden of proving his claim to a legal certainty and by a reasonable preponderance of the evidence; speculation, conjecture, mere possibility and even unsupported probability are not sufficient to support a judgment. 1994In State, DOTD v. Pace, 588 So.2d 145 (La.App. 4 Cir.1991), the court said: In an expropriation case the defendant has the burden of proving his claim to a legal certainty and by a reasonable preponderance of the evidence; speculation, conjecture, mere possibility and even unsupported probability are not sufficient to support a judgment. | 3 | 1994–1996 |
Town of Grand Isle v. Dynamic Constructors, Inc.
green
2 sentences2023Town of Grand Isle v. Dynamic Constructors, Inc., 374 So.2d 703 (La. 1992Town of Grand Isle v. Dynamic Constructors, Inc., 374 So.2d 703 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979). | 2 | 1992–2023 |
Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance Company
green
2 sentences2022Id. at p. 8, 172 So.3d at 627 . 2022Id. at p. 8, 172 So.3d at 627 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
ALLVEND v. Payphone Commissions Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences2020Allvend, 2006-0661, p. 6, 804 So.2d at 30 . 2020Allvend, 2006-0661, p. 6, 804 So.2d at 30 . | 2 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Interiano
green
2 sentences2018State v. Interiano , 03-1760 (La. 2/13/04), 868 So.2d 9 , 13. 2014State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 4 (La.2/13/04), 868 So.2d 9, 13 . | 2 | 2014–2018 |
Walls v. American Optical Corp.
green
2 sentences2012Walls v. American Optical Corp., 1998-0455 (La.09/08/99), 740 So.2d 1262 ; Boyte v. Ward North American Ins. 2005Walls v. American Optical Corp., 98-0455 (La.9/8/99), 740 So.2d 1262 . | 2 | 2005–2012 |
State v. Henderson
green
2 sentences2010State v. Henderson, 2000-0511, p. 7 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/13/00), 775 So.2d 1138, 1142 . 2007State v. Henderson, 2000-0511, p. 7 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/13/00), 775 So.2d 1138, 1142 . | 2 | 2007–2010 |
Boudreaux v. Panger
green
2 sentences1995Boudreaux v. Panger, 490 So.2d at 1085 . 1995Boudreaux v. Panger, 490 So.2d at 1085 . | 2 | 1995–1995 |
Prim v. City of Shreveport
green
2 sentences1991Prim v. City of Shreveport, 297 So.2d 421 (La. 1974). 1985Prim v. City of Shreveport, 297 So.2d 421 (La.1974). | 2 | 1985–1991 |
Levron v. Bonin
green
2 sentences1991Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, 281 So.2d 724 (La.1973); Levron v. Bonin, 448 So.2d 211 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984). 1988Levron v. Bonin, 448 So.2d 211 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984). | 2 | 1988–1991 |
State, Department of Highways v. Lancon
neutral
2 sentences1988LSA-R.S. 48:453; State, Through Department of Highways v. Levy, 242 La. 259 , 136 So.2d 35 (1961); Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Hebert, 469 So.2d 483 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1985), writ denied, 474 So.2d 1295 (La. 1985); State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Estate of Clark, 432 So.2d 405 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983); State, Department of Highways v. Lancon, 174 So.2d 257 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1965). 1967State [Through Dept. of Highways] v. Lancon, La.App., 3 Cir., 174 So.2d 257 , and cases cited therein.’ Also, the highway expropriation statute expressly provides that the landowner has the burden of proving his claim for additional compensation. | 2 | 1967–1988 |
Attaway v. Farley's Glass Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences1987LaPrarie v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 463 So.2d 908 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985), Attaway v. Farley's Glass Company, Inc., 430 So.2d 705 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983). 1985Attaway v. Farley’s Glass Co., Inc., 430 So.2d 705 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983). | 2 | 1985–1987 |
State v. Daley
green
2 sentences1987Defendants cite Confederate Welding & Safety Supply v. Bank of the Mid-South, 458 So.2d 1370 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1984), writ denied 462 So.2d 1264 (La.1985), a case in which the court of appeal stated that the affirmative defenses of laches and estoppel must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. 1986Confederate Welding v. Bank of the Mid-South, 458 So.2d 1370 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1984), writ den., 462 So.2d 1264 (La.1985); McDonald v. Champagne, 340 So.2d 1025 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976); Crescent Cigarette Vending Corporation v. Toca, 271 So.2d 53 (La.App. 4th Cir.1972). | 2 | 1986–1987 |
Confederate Welding & Safety Supply, Inc. v. Bank of the Mid-South
green
2 sentences1987Defendants cite Confederate Welding & Safety Supply v. Bank of the Mid-South, 458 So.2d 1370 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1984), writ denied 462 So.2d 1264 (La.1985), a case in which the court of appeal stated that the affirmative defenses of laches and estoppel must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. 1986Confederate Welding v. Bank of the Mid-South, 458 So.2d 1370 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1984), writ den., 462 So.2d 1264 (La.1985); McDonald v. Champagne, 340 So.2d 1025 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976); Crescent Cigarette Vending Corporation v. Toca, 271 So.2d 53 (La.App. 4th Cir.1972). | 2 | 1986–1987 |
Thornton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
neutral
2 sentences1975Thornton v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, 214 So.2d 192 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1968); Griffin v. Hochendel, 263 So.2d 474 (La. 1974Thornton v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, 214 So.2d 192 (La.App. 4th Cir., 1968); Griffin v. Hochendel, 263 So.2d 474 (La. | 2 | 1974–1975 |
Griffin v. Hochendel
neutral
2 sentences1975Thornton v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, 214 So.2d 192 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1968); Griffin v. Hochendel, 263 So.2d 474 (La. 1974Thornton v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, 214 So.2d 192 (La.App. 4th Cir., 1968); Griffin v. Hochendel, 263 So.2d 474 (La. | 2 | 1974–1975 |
State, Dept. of Hys. v. William T. Burton Indus., Inc.
green
2 sentences1974Id. “[2,3] Essentially, the severance damage sustained by a remainder is the difference in its market value caused by the taking. 1969Id. | 2 | 1969–1974 |
| State v. Baddock green | 2 | 1967–1969 |
| State v. Kurtz neutral | 2 | 1965–1967 |
| Housing Authority v. Boudwine green | 2 | 1961–1962 |
| Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NO green | 1 | 2025–2025 |
| In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of Moses green | 1 | 2025–2025 |
| Carter v. Haygood green | 1 | 2025–2025 |
| Tornabene v. Atlas Life Insurance Company, Inc. neutral | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Tate v. Charles Aguillard Ins. & Real Est. green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Lewis v. Administrator green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Tidwell v. Tidwell neutral | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Boos v. Benson Jeep-Eagle Co., Inc. green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| QUALITY GAS PRODUCTS v. Bank One Corp. green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Hurst v. Judson neutral | 1 | 2012–2012 |
| Blevins v. Hamilton Medical Center, Inc. green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Romero v. Western Sizzlin, Inc. neutral | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Hatcher v. Super Fresh/Sav-A-Center, Inc. neutral | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Pratt v. STATE U. MED. CENTER IN SHREVEPORT neutral | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.