19 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lukegreen2 sentences2019“The trial court’s conclusion that a defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights will not be disturbed on appeal where it is supported by substantial and competent evidence.” State v. Luke, 134 Idaho 294, 297 , 1 P.3d 795, 798 (2000). 2019“The trial court’s conclusion that a defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights will not be disturbed on appeal where it is supported by substantial and competent evidence.” State v. Luke, 134 Idaho 294, 297 , 1 P.3d 795, 798 (2000). | 8 | 12 |
State v. Paynegreen2 sentences2019“A district court’s conclusion that a defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights will only be disturbed on appeal if the conclusion is not supported by substantial and competent evidence.” State v. Adamcik, 152 Idaho 445, 468 , 272 P.3d 417, 440 (2012) (quoting State v. Payne, 146 Idaho 548, 558 , 199 P.3d 123, 133 (2008)). 2019“A district court’s conclusion that a defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights will only be disturbed on appeal if the conclusion is not supported by substantial and competent evidence.” State v. Adamcik, 152 Idaho 445, 468 , 272 P.3d 417, 440 (2012) (quoting State v. Payne, 146 Idaho 548, 558 , 199 P.3d 123, 133 (2008)). | 4 | 4 |
State v. Variegreen2 sentences2011“A district court’s conclusion that a defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights will only be disturbed on appeal if the conclusion is not supported by substantial and competent evidence.” State v. Payne, 146 Idaho 548, 558 , 199 P.3d 123, 133 (2008) (citing State v. Varie, 135 Idaho 848, 851 , 26 P.3d 31, 34 (2001)). 2011“A district court’s conclusion that a defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights will only be disturbed on appeal if the conclusion is not supported by substantial and competent evidence.” State v. Payne, 146 Idaho 548, 558 , 199 P.3d 123, 133 (2008) (citing State v. Varie, 135 Idaho 848, 851 , 26 P.3d 31, 34 (2001)). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences2001State v. Varie, 135 Idaho 848, 851-52 , 26 P.3d 31, 34-35 (2001) (citing Luke, 134 Idaho at 297 , 1 P.3d at 798 ; State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 498 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1341 (1983)). 2001State v. Varie, 135 Idaho 848, 851-52 , 26 P.3d 31, 34-35 (2001) (citing Luke, 134 Idaho at 297 , 1 P.3d at 798 ; State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 498 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1341 (1983)). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Adamcikgreen2 sentences2019“A district court’s conclusion that a defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights will only be disturbed on appeal if the conclusion is not supported by substantial and competent evidence.” State v. Adamcik, 152 Idaho 445, 468 , 272 P.3d 417, 440 (2012) (quoting State v. Payne, 146 Idaho 548, 558 , 199 P.3d 123, 133 (2008)). 2019“A district court’s conclusion that a defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights will only be disturbed on appeal if the conclusion is not supported by substantial and competent evidence.” State v. Adamcik, 152 Idaho 445, 468 , 272 P.3d 417, 440 (2012) (quoting State v. Payne, 146 Idaho 548, 558 , 199 P.3d 123, 133 (2008)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Custodiogreen2 sentences2013State v. Custodio, 136 Idaho 197, 201 , 30 P.3d 975, 979 (Ct.App.2001). 2013State v. Custodio, 136 Idaho 197, 201 , 30 P.3d 975, 979 (Ct.App.2001). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lopez
green
2 sentences2009Id. 2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Reiter v. Huffman
green
2 sentences2001State v. Luke, 134 Idaho 294, 297 , 1 P.3d 795, 798 (2000), citing State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 498 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1341 (1983), cert. *852 denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983). 2001State v. Luke, 134 Idaho 294, 297 , 1 P.3d 795, 798 (2000), citing State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 498 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1341 (1983), cert. *852 denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Harvey v. Breeding
green
1 sentence2001State v. Luke, 134 Idaho 294, 297 , 1 P.3d 795, 798 (2000), citing State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 498 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1341 (1983), cert. *852 denied, 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.