Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Cory Baker Kamerud, United States of America v. Brett Christian Kamerudgreen2 sentences2012United States v. Kamerud, 326 F.3d 1008, 1017 (8th Cir.2003) (quoting United States v. Blum, 65 F.3d 1436, 1444 (8th Cir.1995)). 2006Whitfield, supra; see also United States v. Kamerud, 326 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2003) (holding that if a defendant desires to exercise his constitutional right to testify, he must act affirmatively and express to the trial court his desire to do so at the appropriate time or a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right is deemed to have occurred). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Maestasgreen2 sentences2014State v. Maestas, 299 P.3d 892, 961 (2012). 2014State v. Maestas, 299 P.3d 892, 961 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Dana Blum, United States of America v. Chester Blumgreen1 sentence2012United States v. Kamerud, 326 F.3d 1008, 1017 (8th Cir.2003) (quoting United States v. Blum, 65 F.3d 1436, 1444 (8th Cir.1995)). | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Hill v. State, 323 Ark. 796 , 917 S.W.2d 537 (1996) (per curiam) (Hill V). 2002See Hill v. State, 323 Ark. 796 , 917 S.W.2d 537 (1996) (per curiam) (Hill V). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. United States
green
2 sentences2009Furthermore, “after a knowing and voluntary waiver of the Miranda rights, law enforcement officers may continue questioning until and unless the suspect clearly requests an attorney.” Id. at 461 , 114 S.Ct. 2350 . 2009Furthermore, “after a knowing and voluntary waiver of the Miranda rights, law enforcement officers may continue questioning until and unless the suspect clearly requests an attorney.” Id. at 461 , 114 S.Ct. 2350 . | 6 | 2005–2013 |
Ward v. State.3
green
1 sentence2015We held that the evaluations used by the circuit court and this court in regards to Roberts’s competency to waive his postconviction rights were insufficient because they had occurred over three years prior to the postconviction 7 Cite as 2015 Ark. 62 hearing and were focused on competency to stand trial rather than competency to elect execution. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences2014Medlock v. State, 328 Ark. 229 , 942 S.W.2d 861 (1997); Williams v. State, 65 Ark.App. 176 , 986 S.W.2d 123 (1999). 2014Medlock v. State, 328 Ark. 229 , 942 S.W.2d 861 (1997); Williams v. State, 65 Ark.App. 176 , 986 S.W.2d 123 (1999). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Charles L. Singleton v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
green
2 sentences2014Id. 2014Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Medlock v. State
green
2 sentences2014Medlock v. State, 328 Ark. 229 , 942 S.W.2d 861 (1997); Williams v. State, 65 Ark.App. 176 , 986 S.W.2d 123 (1999). 2014Medlock v. State, 328 Ark. 229 , 942 S.W.2d 861 (1997); Williams v. State, 65 Ark.App. 176 , 986 S.W.2d 123 (1999). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Wertz v. State
green
1 sentence2014This court should require that any waiver of investigation or presentation 29 Cite as 2014 Ark. 240 of mitigating circumstances in a capital trial be a knowing and voluntary waiver. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Higgins v. State
green
2 sentences2006Higgins v. State, 317 Ark. 555 , 879 S.W.2d 424 (1994). 2006Higgins v. State, 317 Ark. 555 , 879 S.W.2d 424 (1994). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Whitfield v. Bowersox
green
1 sentence2006Whitfield, supra; see also United States v. Kamerud, 326 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2003) (holding that if a defendant desires to exercise his constitutional right to testify, he must act affirmatively and express to the trial court his desire to do so at the appropriate time or a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right is deemed to have occurred). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.