Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Bookergreen1 sentence2020Because Hedrick was not on notice of the aggravator at the time he waived his right to a jury trial, we conclude that his waiver cannot reasonably be interpreted as including a knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to a jury trial on 16 (...continued) ‘statutory maximum’ is not the maximum sentence a judge may impose after finding additional facts, but the maximum he may impose without any additional findings.”). 17 United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 244 (2005) (reaffirming Apprendi’s holding that “[a]ny fact (other than a prior conviction) which is necessary to support a sentence exce | 1 | 1 |
McGlauflin v. Stategreen1 sentence1998See e.g., Dolchok v. State, 689 P.2d 277 , 286 (Alaska 1982); Walker v. State, 578 P.2d 1388, 1389-91 (Alaska 1978); McGlauflin v. State, 857 P.2d 366, 368-69 (Alaska App.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Stategreen1 sentence1998See e.g., Dolchok v. State, 689 P.2d 277 , 286 (Alaska 1982); Walker v. State, 578 P.2d 1388, 1389-91 (Alaska 1978); McGlauflin v. State, 857 P.2d 366, 368-69 (Alaska App.1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fuller v. Oregon
green
1 sentence1995Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Gundersen v. Municipality of Anchorage
green
1 sentence1995Gundersen, 792 P.2d at 677 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Walunga v. State
green
1 sentence1993Subsequently, in Walunga v. State, 630 P.2d 527 (Alaska 1981), the supreme court elaborated on the requirement of a knowing and voluntary waiver: Alaska Criminal Rule 23(a) requires that a defendant’s waiver of the right to jury trial be in writing, but it does not on its face require the trial judge to make an *369 inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the ... waiver. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Quick v. State
green
1 sentence1987We reasoned that “[t]he mere fact that a person is under the age of majority does not automatically render him incapable of making a knowing and voluntary waiver.” Id. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.