knowing and voluntary waiver (Nebraska) · Go Syfert
← Nebraska issues

knowing and voluntary waiver in Nebraska

9 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2025 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Hernandezgreen
neb · 2018 · cited in 3 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2020–2023
2 sentences

2020Whether a knowing and voluntary waiver has been made is determined by looking to the totality of the circumstances State v. Hernandez, 299 Neb. 896, 918 , 911 N.W.2d 524, 543 (2018).

2020Whether a knowing and voluntary waiver has been made is determined by looking to the totality of the circumstances State v. Hernandez, 299 Neb. 896, 918 , 911 N.W.2d 524, 543 (2018).

13
State v. Bensongreen
neb · 2020 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020Whether a knowing and voluntary waiver of Miranda rights has been made is determined by looking to the totality of the circumstances. - 951 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports STATE v. BENSON Cite as 305 Neb. 949 15.

2020The court found Benson’s September 20, 2017, state- ments to Negrete were admissible because Benson was not in custody when Negrete was taking his report and, as such, Benson was not required to make a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights before he could be questioned. - 957 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports STATE v. BENSON Cite as 305 Neb. 949 The court also found Benson’s September 23 statements to Davis were admissible because Davis informed Benson of his Miranda rights, Benson waived his rights and agreed to talk to Davis, and there is no requiremen

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Price green
neb · 2025
1 sentence

2025PRICE Cite as 320 Neb. 1 abandon them. 38 A waiver of Miranda rights is voluntary if it is the product of a free and deliberate choice, rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception. 39 [26-28] Whether a knowing and voluntary waiver of Miranda rights has been made is determined by looking to the totality of the circumstances. 40 A waiver of Miranda rights need not be express and can instead be implied. 41 The main purpose of Miranda is to ensure that an accused is advised of and understands the right to remain silent and the right to counsel. 42 Price asserts the Bellevue officers violated

12025–2025
State v. Sutton green
neb · 2025
1 sentence

2025SUTTON Cite as 319 Neb. 581 the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.” 46 A waiver is voluntary if it is the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than through intimidation, coercion, or deception. 47 [25] Whether a knowing and voluntary waiver has been made is determined by looking to the totality of the circum- stances. 48 Factors to consider include the tactics used by the police, the details of the interrogation, and any characteristics of the accused that might cause his or her will to be easily overborne. 49 These characteristics

12025–2025
James Arnold Smith v. Jack R. Duckworth and Indiana Attorney General green
ca7 · 1988
1 sentence

2023Smith v. Duckworth, 856 F.2d 909 (7th Cir. 1988).

12023–2023
State v. Burries green
neb · 2017
2 sentences

2020Benson’s September 23, 2017, Statements Benson assigns the district court should have suppressed his statements to Davis on September 23, 2017, because he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his Miranda rights. [13,14] To be a valid waiver of Miranda rights, a waiver must be knowingly and voluntarily made. 17 A waiver is know- ing if it is made with a full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it. 18 A waiver is voluntary if it is the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than through intimidation, coer- cion, or

2020Benson’s September 23, 2017, Statements Benson assigns the district court should have suppressed his statements to Davis on September 23, 2017, because he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his Miranda rights. [13,14] To be a valid waiver of Miranda rights, a waiver must be knowingly and voluntarily made. 17 A waiver is know- ing if it is made with a full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it. 18 A waiver is voluntary if it is the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than through intimidation, coer- cion, or

12020–2020
State v. Lamberson green
nebctapp · 2018
1 sentence

2020In State v. Lamberson, 26 Neb.

12020–2020
Cubbage v. State green
md · 1985
2 sentences

2015Because of such concerns, the court concluded that “the bet- ter rule is to hold the defendant to the knowing and voluntary waiver which he made” and that “[o]nce the appellate court confirms that the waiver is indeed knowing and voluntary, the appeal going to the merits of the judgment of conviction should be dismissed.” Id. at 250 , 498 A.2d at 639 .

2015Because of such concerns, the court concluded that “the bet- ter rule is to hold the defendant to the knowing and voluntary waiver which he made” and that “[o]nce the appellate court confirms that the waiver is indeed knowing and voluntary, the appeal going to the merits of the judgment of conviction should be dismissed.” Id. at 250 , 498 A.2d at 639 .

12015–2015
State v. Jackson neutral
neb · 1974
2 sentences

2001Therefore, as was done in State v. Jackson, 192 Neb. 39 , 218 N.W.2d 430 (1974), and State v. Zobel, 192 Neb. 480 , 222 N.W.2d 570 (1974), we vacate the sentence and remand the cause to the district court for Dodge County with directions to have a presentence investigation completed and to resentence Kellogg on the burglary conviction.

2001Therefore, as was done in State v. Jackson, 192 Neb. 39 , 218 N.W.2d 430 (1974), and State v. Zobel, 192 Neb. 480 , 222 N.W.2d 570 (1974), we vacate the sentence and remand the cause to the district court for Dodge County with directions to have a presentence investigation completed and to resentence Kellogg on the burglary conviction.

12001–2001
State v. Zobel green
neb · 1974
2 sentences

2001Therefore, as was done in State v. Jackson, 192 Neb. 39 , 218 N.W.2d 430 (1974), and State v. Zobel, 192 Neb. 480 , 222 N.W.2d 570 (1974), we vacate the sentence and remand the cause to the district court for Dodge County with directions to have a presentence investigation completed and to resentence Kellogg on the burglary conviction.

2001Therefore, as was done in State v. Jackson, 192 Neb. 39 , 218 N.W.2d 430 (1974), and State v. Zobel, 192 Neb. 480 , 222 N.W.2d 570 (1974), we vacate the sentence and remand the cause to the district court for Dodge County with directions to have a presentence investigation completed and to resentence Kellogg on the burglary conviction.

12001–2001
State v. Burlison green
neb · 1998
2 sentences

1999State v. Dean, 246 Neb. 869 , 523 N.W.2d 681 (1994), overruled on other grounds, State v. Burlison, 255 Neb. 190 , 583 N.W.2d 31 (1998).

1999State v. Dean, 246 Neb. 869 , 523 N.W.2d 681 (1994), overruled on other grounds, State v. Burlison, 255 Neb. 190 , 583 N.W.2d 31 (1998).

11999–1999
State v. Dean green
neb · 1994
2 sentences

1999State v. Dean, 246 Neb. 869 , 523 N.W.2d 681 (1994), overruled on other grounds, State v. Burlison, 255 Neb. 190 , 583 N.W.2d 31 (1998).

1999State v. Dean, 246 Neb. 869 , 523 N.W.2d 681 (1994), overruled on other grounds, State v. Burlison, 255 Neb. 190 , 583 N.W.2d 31 (1998).

11999–1999

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 139 (1974–2026) CA 118 (1980–2026) LA 110 (1981–2025) IL 85 (1975–2026) GA 77 (1979–2023) IN 65 (1972–2020) PA 55 (1969–2025) MD 54 (1965–2026) TX 54 (1979–2026) NJ 53 (1988–2026) FL 50 (1978–2025) SC 43 (1992–2025) MS 43 (1984–2025) OH 41 (1989–2026) WA 40 (1977–2025) OR 38 (1978–2026) TN 37 (1993–2026) CT 32 (1972–2025) MA 32 (1973–2024) NC 30 (1977–2024) KS 25 (1992–2026) WI 25 (1979–2026) HI 23 (1992–2025) MO 22 (1980–2023) OK 21 (1982–2023) UT 20 (1989–2024) VA 19 (1991–2024) ID 19 (2000–2022) IA 18 (2002–2024) MI 17 (1982–2025) NM 16 (1981–2020) AR 13 (2002–2015) SD 12 (1987–2019) DC 11 (1978–2024) AL 11 (1972–2013) AZ 11 (1973–2023) DE 10 (1978–2026) KY 9 (1995–2026) NE 9 (1999–2025) MT 8 (1995–2025) NV 7 (1987–2025) WY 7 (1986–2021) VT 7 (1994–2021) AK 6 (1987–2020) RI 6 (1974–2011) MN 6 (1988–2015) ME 5 (1979–2003) NH 5 (2001–2018) CO 4 (1995–2014) ND 4 (1997–2021) WV 3 (1982–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check