followed rule (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

followed rule in Louisiana

18 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1913–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Stobart v. State Through DOTDgreen
la · 1993 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012STANDARD OF REVIEW In Garcia v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, this Court followed the standard of review for appellate courts as articulated in Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, 617 So.2d 880, 882 (La.1993): A court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is clearly wrong.” Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989).

11
State v. Jewellgreen
la · 1976 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
1 sentence

1980In State v. LaRue, 368 So.2d 1048 (La.1979), this Court re-emphasized the following observation made in State v. Jewell, 338 So.2d 633, 640 (La.1976): "The claim is made that the search was conducted pursuant to a departmental regulation.

11
Ball v. Campbellgreen
la · 1951 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1952–1952
1 sentence

1952See 52 So. 2d at page 755 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (20)

CaseCitedYears
Rideau v. Whitley green
ca5 · 2000
2 sentences

2004Rideau, 237 F.3d at 489 , quoting Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 , 262 & 264, 106 S.Ct. 617 , 88 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986).

2004Rideau, 237 F.3d at 489 , quoting Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 , 262 & 264, 106 S.Ct. 617 , 88 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986).

22004–2004
Vasquez v. Hillery green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

2004Rideau, 237 F.3d at 489 , quoting Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 , 262 & 264, 106 S.Ct. 617 , 88 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986).

2004Rideau, 237 F.3d at 489 , quoting Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 , 262 & 264, 106 S.Ct. 617 , 88 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986).

22004–2004
State v. Harvey green
la · 1978
2 sentences

1981The trial court followed the rule promulgated in Harvey, supra; therefore Assignment of Error Number 3 is without merit.

1981The trial court followed the rule promulgated in Harvey, supra; therefore Assignment of Error Number 3 is without merit.

21981–1981
State Ex Rel. Porter v. Butler green
la · 1991
1 sentence

2023Porter v. Butler, 573 So. 2d 1106 (La. 1991).

12023–2023
Rosell v. Esco green
la · 1989
1 sentence

2012STANDARD OF REVIEW In Garcia v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, this Court followed the standard of review for appellate courts as articulated in Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, 617 So.2d 880, 882 (La.1993): A court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is clearly wrong.” Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989).

12012–2012
Henderson v. Maloid green
lactapp · 1996
1 sentence

2010Since then, the Futch “dicta” has been primarily cited with disapproval. 5 However, plaintiff contends that this court followed the principle established in Futch in Henderson v. Maloid, 96-0285, 96-0286 (La.App. 1st Cir.11/8/96), 683 So.2d 342 , writ denied, 96-2901 (La£/24/97),8 686 So.2d 866 .

12010–2010
Henderson v. Maloid neutral
la · 1997
1 sentence

2010Since then, the Futch “dicta” has been primarily cited with disapproval. 5 However, plaintiff contends that this court followed the principle established in Futch in Henderson v. Maloid, 96-0285, 96-0286 (La.App. 1st Cir.11/8/96), 683 So.2d 342 , writ denied, 96-2901 (La£/24/97),8 686 So.2d 866 .

12010–2010
Green v. Champion Ins. Co. green
lactapp · 1991
1 sentence

2003In In Re: New Orleans Train Car Leakage, this Court followed factors to be considered in the application of a “single business enterprise” as set forth in Green v. Champion Insurance Company, 577 So.2d 249 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991).

12003–2003
State v. Washington green
la · 1981
1 sentence

1986The trial court followed the rule promulgated in Harvey ; State v. Washington, 407 So.2d 1138 (La.1981); and State v. Alexandra, 451 So.2d 1278 (La.App. 4th Cir.1984).

11986–1986
State v. Alexandra neutral
lactapp · 1984
1 sentence

1986The trial court followed the rule promulgated in Harvey ; State v. Washington, 407 So.2d 1138 (La.1981); and State v. Alexandra, 451 So.2d 1278 (La.App. 4th Cir.1984).

11986–1986
State v. LaRue green
la · 1979
1 sentence

1980In State v. LaRue, 368 So.2d 1048 (La.1979), this Court re-emphasized the following observation made in State v. Jewell, 338 So.2d 633, 640 (La.1976): "The claim is made that the search was conducted pursuant to a departmental regulation.

11980–1980
Holland v. Buckley green
la · 1974
1 sentence

1978In finding defendants liable the trial court followed the rule of Holland v. Buckley, 305 So.2d 113 (La.1974), wherein the Supreme Court stated: “When a domesticated animal harms another, the master of the animal is presumed to be at fault.

11978–1978
Roussel v. Colonial Sugars Company green
la · 1975
1 sentence

1977In Fields , this court followed the standard of medical evidence required to establish causal relationship of employment in heart attack and related cases as set forth in Roussel v. Colonial Sugars Company, 318 So.2d 37 (La.1975).

11977–1977
Hill v. Knight green
lactapp · 1935
1 sentence

1967The court said: "In the present case, Tiner was not confronted with any circumstances indicating the necessity of anticipating a grossly negligent act on the part of Knight which caused his vehicle to strike the concrete abutment * * *." The court in Broussard v. Savant Lumber Company, La.App., 134 So.2d 369 , said: "A driver is not negligent for following a preceding vehicle too closely, when he maintains an interval sufficient for reasonable foreseeable hazards * * *." In Nomey v. Great American Indemnity Company, supra, the court followed the rule of Hill v. Knight, supra, and absolved from

11967–1967
Broussard v. Savant Lumber Company neutral
lactapp · 1961
1 sentence

1967The court said: "In the present case, Tiner was not confronted with any circumstances indicating the necessity of anticipating a grossly negligent act on the part of Knight which caused his vehicle to strike the concrete abutment * * *." The court in Broussard v. Savant Lumber Company, La.App., 134 So.2d 369 , said: "A driver is not negligent for following a preceding vehicle too closely, when he maintains an interval sufficient for reasonable foreseeable hazards * * *." In Nomey v. Great American Indemnity Company, supra, the court followed the rule of Hill v. Knight, supra, and absolved from

11967–1967
State Ex Rel. Davis v. McInnis green
la · 1931
1 sentence

1965The court followed the doctrine of Mulhern v. Hayne, 171 La. 1003 , 132 So. 659 , that a joint lease with a primary term running past the expiration date of an outstanding interest keeps the interest alive during the lease period.

11965–1965
Mulhern v. Hayne green
la · 1931
1 sentence

1965The court followed the doctrine of Mulhern v. Hayne, 171 La. 1003 , 132 So. 659 , that a joint lease with a primary term running past the expiration date of an outstanding interest keeps the interest alive during the lease period.

11965–1965
Nicholls v. Maddox neutral
la · 1900
1 sentence

1931Nicholls v. Maddox, 52 La.

11931–1931
Joseph Chalona Co. v. American Railway Express Co. neutral
lactapp · 1929
1 sentence

1930Express Co., 11 La.

11930–1930
State ex rel. Vial v. Judge of the Twenty-Sixth District Court neutral
· 1884
1 sentence

1913Vial v. Judge, 36 La.

11913–1913

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 42 (1895–2022) CA 40 (1905–2020) OK 34 (1912–1984) TX 34 (1916–2018) LA 18 (1913–2023) OH 16 (1858–2025) PA 16 (1921–2015) MO 16 (1883–2021) WA 15 (1919–2024) NY 14 (1838–2024) KS 14 (1914–2002) KY 13 (1907–1977) IN 11 (1917–2017) MI 10 (1892–2018) FL 10 (1917–2007) MN 10 (1889–2003) GA 10 (1913–2008) MS 10 (1950–2017) OR 10 (1965–2011) AL 10 (1909–1990) AR 9 (1903–2002) WI 8 (1913–2021) NE 8 (1916–1993) TN 8 (1923–2014) CT 7 (1931–2024) ID 7 (1931–2005) MT 6 (1933–1995) IA 6 (1882–1998) NC 6 (1934–2018) AZ 5 (1904–2005) WV 4 (1939–1977) SD 4 (1891–1999) MD 4 (1940–2004) UT 4 (1885–2024) NJ 4 (1976–2014) ND 3 (1957–1984) NM 3 (1912–1994) CO 3 (1999–2005) ME 3 (1995–2020) DC 3 (1983–2018) SC 2 (1963–1970) AK 2 (1981–1989) WY 2 (1959–1976) HI 2 (1968–1970) VA 2 (1930–1940) RI 2 (1917–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check