Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cole v. Stategreen2 sentences1999In Cole v. State, 666 So.2d 767, 776-77 (Miss.1995) this Court followed the standard set out in Celestine v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 353, 356-57 (5th Cir.1984) ( following Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372, 1394 (5th Cir.1984) (defendant's argument that additional witnesses should have been included to testify regarding the defendant's "troubled adolescence" was rejected)). 1992In Cole v. State, 666 So.2d 767, 776-77 (Miss. 1995) this Court followed the standard set out in Celestine v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 353, 356-57 (5th Cir. 1984) (following Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372, 1394 (5th Cir. 1984) (defendant's argument that additional witnesses should have been included to testify regarding the defendant's "troubled adolescence" was rejected). | 2 | 2 |
Robert Lee Willie v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiarygreen2 sentences1999In Cole v. State, 666 So.2d 767, 776-77 (Miss.1995) this Court followed the standard set out in Celestine v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 353, 356-57 (5th Cir.1984) ( following Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372, 1394 (5th Cir.1984) (defendant's argument that additional witnesses should have been included to testify regarding the defendant's "troubled adolescence" was rejected)). 1992In Cole v. State, 666 So.2d 767, 776-77 (Miss. 1995) this Court followed the standard set out in Celestine v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 353, 356-57 (5th Cir. 1984) (following Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372, 1394 (5th Cir. 1984) (defendant's argument that additional witnesses should have been included to testify regarding the defendant's "troubled adolescence" was rejected). | 2 | 2 |
Willie Lawrence Celestine v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiarygreen2 sentences1999In Cole v. State, 666 So.2d 767, 776-77 (Miss.1995) this Court followed the standard set out in Celestine v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 353, 356-57 (5th Cir.1984) ( following Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372, 1394 (5th Cir.1984) (defendant's argument that additional witnesses should have been included to testify regarding the defendant's "troubled adolescence" was rejected)). 1992In Cole v. State, 666 So.2d 767, 776-77 (Miss. 1995) this Court followed the standard set out in Celestine v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 353, 356-57 (5th Cir. 1984) (following Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372, 1394 (5th Cir. 1984) (defendant's argument that additional witnesses should have been included to testify regarding the defendant's "troubled adolescence" was rejected). | 2 | 2 |
Payne v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Payne v. State, 462 So.2d 902, 904 (Miss.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Foote v. Mississippi State Bar Ass'ngreen1 sentence1996In Mississippi Bar v. Mathis, 620 So.2d 1213, 1219 (Miss. 1993), the Court followed the rule that "[t]his Court will not hesitate to impose substantial sanctions upon an attorney for any act which evinces want of personal honesty and integrity or renders such *622 attorney unworthy of public confidence," quoting Foote v. Mississippi State Bar, 517 So.2d 561, 564 (Miss. 1987). | 1 | 1 |
Mississippi Bar v. Mathisgreen1 sentence1996In Mississippi Bar v. Mathis, 620 So.2d 1213, 1219 (Miss. 1993), the Court followed the rule that "[t]his Court will not hesitate to impose substantial sanctions upon an attorney for any act which evinces want of personal honesty and integrity or renders such *622 attorney unworthy of public confidence," quoting Foote v. Mississippi State Bar, 517 So.2d 561, 564 (Miss. 1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
LaRue v. LaRue
green
2 sentences2017Therefore, where one expands, the other must recede.” LaRue v. LaRue, 172 W. 2017Therefore, where one expands, the other must recede.” LaRue v. LaRue, 172 W. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
United States v. Ash
green
2 sentences1978The United States Supreme Court has held that the Sixth Amendment does not grant the right to counsel at photographic displays conducted by the government for the purpose of allowing a witness to make identification [ United States v. Ash, 413 U.S. 300 , 93 S.Ct. 2568 , 37 L.Ed.2d 619 (1973)], and this Court followed that principle in Clubb v. State, supra . 1978The United States Supreme Court has held that the Sixth Amendment does not grant the right to counsel at photographic displays conducted by the government for the purpose of allowing a witness to make identification [ United States v. Ash, 413 U.S. 300 , 93 S.Ct. 2568 , 37 L.Ed.2d 619 (1973)], and this Court followed that principle in Clubb v. State, supra . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Berry v. State
green
1 sentence1974In the case of Berry v. State, 288 So.2d 457 , decided January 14, 1974, this Court followed the rule that objection to instructions cannot be made for the first time on appeal as is attempted in the case before us. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Breland
neutral
2 sentences1967Under these circumstances this Court followed the rule announced in Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Breland, 117 Miss. 479 , 78 So. 362 , L.R.A. 1918D, 1009 (1918), and held that since the insurer had funds in his hand belonging to the insured, it was its duty to apply those funds to the payment of the premium then in default. 1967Under these circumstances this Court followed the rule announced in Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Breland, 117 Miss. 479 , 78 So. 362 , L.R.A. 1918D, 1009 (1918), and held that since the insurer had funds in his hand belonging to the insured, it was its duty to apply those funds to the payment of the premium then in default. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill
green
2 sentences1952In granting the peremptory instruction requested by the defendant, the lower court followed the rule laid down *62 by the Supreme Court of tbe United States in the case of Federal Clop Insurance Corporation v. Merrill, 332 U. S. 380 , 68 S. Ct. 1, 4 , 92 L. 1952In granting the peremptory instruction requested by the defendant, the lower court followed the rule laid down *62 by the Supreme Court of tbe United States in the case of Federal Clop Insurance Corporation v. Merrill, 332 U. S. 380 , 68 S. Ct. 1, 4 , 92 L. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Hancock County v. State Highway Commission
green
2 sentences1950Commission, 188 Miss. 158 , 193 So. 808, 809 , the Court followed the rule in Trahan, et al. v. Price, State Auditor, supra, and said: “The writ of mandamus is distinct from ordinary suits. 1950Commission, 188 Miss. 158 , 193 So. 808, 809 , the Court followed the rule in Trahan, et al. v. Price, State Auditor, supra, and said: “The writ of mandamus is distinct from ordinary suits. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.