followed rule in Wisconsin

2004In Luciani, 199 Wis. 2d at 295 , our supreme court stated that the trial court can deviate from child support percentage guidelines when it finds that use of the guidelines "would be unfair to the children or either of the parties." Here, the trial court followed the standard guideline, but deviated from the shared-time payer formula, to craft a child support award it felt was fair to Timothy and Amy.

1979That instruction included the following language: “[Y]ou will determine how much or to what extent each person named in the question is to blame for the accident and considering the conduct of the persons named in the question considered as a whole, you will determine whether one made a larger, equal or smaller contribution than the others.” This is substantially similar to the instruction approved in Lovesee v. Allied Development Corp., 45 Wis.2d 840 , 173 N.W.2d 196 (1970).

1972At the time the pleas of guilty were taken in 1965, this court followed the rule of State v. Strickland (1965), 27 Wis. 2d 623 , 135 N. W. 2d 295 .

1972At the time the pleas of guilty were taken in 1965, this court followed the rule of State v. Strickland (1965), 27 Wis. 2d 623 , 135 N. W. 2d 295 .

1941This court followed the rule laid down in Connolly v. General Construction Co., supra, in State v. Arnold (1935), 217 Wis. 340 , 258 N. W. 843 .

1941This court followed the rule laid down in Connolly v. General Construction Co., supra, in State v. Arnold (1935), 217 Wis. 340 , 258 N. W. 843 .

1922In another action for specific performance where the property sold was represented to contain forty-nine acres but in fact contained about thirty-two and one-half acres, the court followed the rule laid down in the foregoing case and said: “Where the title fails to only a part of the land conveyed, the grantee may recover, in an action on the covenants of seizin and right to convey, or upon an agreement to convey, such fractional part of the whole consideration paid as the value at the time of the purchase of the piece to which the title fails' bears to the whole purchase price, and interest t

1922In another action for specific performance where the property sold was represented to contain forty-nine acres but in fact contained about thirty-two and one-half acres, the court followed the rule laid down in the foregoing case and said: “Where the title fails to only a part of the land conveyed, the grantee may recover, in an action on the covenants of seizin and right to convey, or upon an agreement to convey, such fractional part of the whole consideration paid as the value at the time of the purchase of the piece to which the title fails' bears to the whole purchase price, and interest t

1922In another action for specific performance where the property sold was represented to contain forty-nine acres but in fact contained about thirty-two and one-half acres, the court followed the rule laid down in the foregoing case and said: “Where the title fails to only a part of the land conveyed, the grantee may recover, in an action on the covenants of seizin and right to convey, or upon an agreement to convey, such fractional part of the whole consideration paid as the value at the time of the purchase of the piece to which the title fails' bears to the whole purchase price, and interest t

1922In another action for specific performance where the property sold was represented to contain forty-nine acres but in fact contained about thirty-two and one-half acres, the court followed the rule laid down in the foregoing case and said: “Where the title fails to only a part of the land conveyed, the grantee may recover, in an action on the covenants of seizin and right to convey, or upon an agreement to convey, such fractional part of the whole consideration paid as the value at the time of the purchase of the piece to which the title fails' bears to the whole purchase price, and interest t

1922In another action for specific performance where the property sold was represented to contain forty-nine acres but in fact contained about thirty-two and one-half acres, the court followed the rule laid down in the foregoing case and said: “Where the title fails to only a part of the land conveyed, the grantee may recover, in an action on the covenants of seizin and right to convey, or upon an agreement to convey, such fractional part of the whole consideration paid as the value at the time of the purchase of the piece to which the title fails' bears to the whole purchase price, and interest t

1922In another action for specific performance where the property sold was represented to contain forty-nine acres but in fact contained about thirty-two and one-half acres, the court followed the rule laid down in the foregoing case and said: “Where the title fails to only a part of the land conveyed, the grantee may recover, in an action on the covenants of seizin and right to convey, or upon an agreement to convey, such fractional part of the whole consideration paid as the value at the time of the purchase of the piece to which the title fails' bears to the whole purchase price, and interest t

1913In the case of Stickney v. Stickney, 131 U. S. 227 , 9 Sup. Ct. 677, the rule is well stated by the supreme court of the United States as follows: “We think that whenever a husband acquires possession of the separate property of his wife, whether with or without her consent, he must be deemed to hold it in trust for her benefit, in the absence of any direct evidence that she intended to make a gift of it to him.” The trial court followed this rule, and hence the judgment must be affirmed.