16 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1915–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Anlikergreen2 sentences2012Still, the division must be “justified and equitable under all the circumstances and factors set forth in section 598.21(1).” Id. 2005See In re Marriage of Probasco, 676 N.W.2d 179, 184 (Iowa 2004) (“Property division is based on each spouse’s ‘right to “a just and equitable share of the property accumulated as the result of their joint efforts.” ’ ” (quoting In re Marriage of Francis, 442 N.W.2d 59, 62 (Iowa 1989))); see also In re Marriage of Anliker, 694 N.W.2d 535, 542 (Iowa 2005) (“[I]n deciding what constitutes an equitable distribution of property, there need not be an equal division if the division is justified and equitable under all of the circumstances and factors set forth in section 598.21(1).” (Citation omitted | 1 | 2 |
Lynn G. Lamasters Vs. State of Iowagreen1 sentence2022See Lamasters v. State, 821 N.W.2d 856 , 864 n.2 (Iowa 2012). | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Marriage of Francisgreen2 sentences2005See In re Marriage of Probasco, 676 N.W.2d 179, 184 (Iowa 2004) (“Property division is based on each spouse’s ‘right to “a just and equitable share of the property accumulated as the result of their joint efforts.” ’ ” (quoting In re Marriage of Francis, 442 N.W.2d 59, 62 (Iowa 1989))); see also In re Marriage of Anliker, 694 N.W.2d 535, 542 (Iowa 2005) (“[I]n deciding what constitutes an equitable distribution of property, there need not be an equal division if the division is justified and equitable under all of the circumstances and factors set forth in section 598.21(1).” (Citation omitted 2005See In re Marriage of Probasco, 676 N.W.2d 179, 184 (Iowa 2004) ("Property division is based on each spouse's `right to "a just and equitable share of the property accumulated as the result of their joint efforts."'" (quoting In re Marriage of Francis, 442 N.W.2d 59, 62 (Iowa 1989))); see also In re Marriage of Anliker, 694 N.W.2d 535, 542 (Iowa 2005) ("[I]n deciding what constitutes an equitable distribution of property, there need not be an equal division if the division is justified and equitable under all of the circumstances and factors set forth in section 598.21(1)." (Citation omitted; | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Marriage Probascogreen2 sentences2005See In re Marriage of Probasco, 676 N.W.2d 179, 184 (Iowa 2004) (“Property division is based on each spouse’s ‘right to “a just and equitable share of the property accumulated as the result of their joint efforts.” ’ ” (quoting In re Marriage of Francis, 442 N.W.2d 59, 62 (Iowa 1989))); see also In re Marriage of Anliker, 694 N.W.2d 535, 542 (Iowa 2005) (“[I]n deciding what constitutes an equitable distribution of property, there need not be an equal division if the division is justified and equitable under all of the circumstances and factors set forth in section 598.21(1).” (Citation omitted 2005See In re Marriage of Probasco, 676 N.W.2d 179, 184 (Iowa 2004) ("Property division is based on each spouse's `right to "a just and equitable share of the property accumulated as the result of their joint efforts."'" (quoting In re Marriage of Francis, 442 N.W.2d 59, 62 (Iowa 1989))); see also In re Marriage of Anliker, 694 N.W.2d 535, 542 (Iowa 2005) ("[I]n deciding what constitutes an equitable distribution of property, there need not be an equal division if the division is justified and equitable under all of the circumstances and factors set forth in section 598.21(1)." (Citation omitted; | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of McNerneygreen1 sentence2005In re Marriage of McNerney, 417 N.W.2d 205, 209 (Iowa 1987). | 1 | 1 |
Mounsey v. Ellardgreen2 sentences1999We agree that this “ ‘reasonable care in all the circumstances standard will provide the most effective way to achieve an allocation of the costs of human injury which conforms to present community values.’ ” Id. (quoting Mounsey v. Ellard, 363 Mass. 693 , 297 N.E.2d 43, 52 (1973)). 1999We agree that this “ ‘reasonable care in all the circumstances standard will provide the most effective way to achieve an allocation of the costs of human injury which conforms to present community values.’ ” Id. (quoting Mounsey v. Ellard, 363 Mass. 693 , 297 N.E.2d 43, 52 (1973)). | 1 | 1 |
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Nadlergreen1 sentence1996See DR 6-101(A); Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Nadler, 467 N.W.2d 250, 253 (Iowa 1991). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cullisongreen1 sentence1988State v. Cullison, 227 N.W.2d 121, 127 (Iowa 1975). | 1 | 1 |
Michels v. Brewergreen1 sentence1974State v. Hackett, 201 N.W.2d 487, 490 (Iowa 1972); State v. York, 210 N.W.2d 608, 609 (Iowa 1973); Michels v. Brewer, 211 N.W.2d 293, 296 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Yorkgreen1 sentence1974State v. Hackett, 201 N.W.2d 487, 490 (Iowa 1972); State v. York, 210 N.W.2d 608, 609 (Iowa 1973); Michels v. Brewer, 211 N.W.2d 293, 296 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hackettgreen1 sentence1974State v. Hackett, 201 N.W.2d 487, 490 (Iowa 1972); State v. York, 210 N.W.2d 608, 609 (Iowa 1973); Michels v. Brewer, 211 N.W.2d 293, 296 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Plymouth Gypsum Plaster Co.green1 sentence1954LaSell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp., 233 Iowa 929 , 943 et seq., 11 N.W.2d 36 ; Wood v. Tri-States Theater Corp., 237 Iowa 799, 807 , 23 N.W.2d 843, 847 ; Johnson v. Plymouth Gypsum Plaster Co., 174 Iowa 498, 503, 504 , 156 N.W. 721 , 724; Langner v. Caviness, 238 Iowa 774 , 28 N.W.2d 421 , 172 A. L. | 1 | 1 |
Wright v. What Cheer Clay Products Co.green2 sentences1939See Wright v. What Cheer Clay Products Co., 221 Iowa 1292, 1302 , 267 N.W. 92, 97 . 1939See Wright v. What Cheer Clay Products Co., 221 Iowa 1292, 1302 , 267 N.W. 92, 97 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Countryman
green
1 sentence2023Countryman, 572 N.W.2d at 559 . 10 Id. at 175 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul Arthur Silich
green
1 sentence2016Silich, 872 N.W.2d at 193 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Henke v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Company
green
2 sentences2004Instead, the attorney-client relationship is not created until all of the circumstances and factors reveal a commitment to a relationship marked by "the usual confidences of client and attorney." Henke, 249 Iowa at 618 , 87 N.W.2d at 923 . 2004Instead, the attorney-client relationship is not created until all of the circumstances and factors reveal a commitment to a relationship marked by "the usual confidences of client and attorney." Henke, 249 Iowa at 618 , 87 N.W.2d at 923 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Sargent v. Ross
green
1 sentence1999We agree that this “ ‘reasonable care in all the circumstances standard will provide the most effective way to achieve an allocation of the costs of human injury which conforms to present community values.’ ” Id. (quoting Mounsey v. Ellard, 363 Mass. 693 , 297 N.E.2d 43, 52 (1973)). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Fryer v. State
green
1 sentence1983Id. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McAlpine
green
1 sentence1983Id. at 750, 391 A.2d at 89-90 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Langner v. Caviness
green
1 sentence1954LaSell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp., 233 Iowa 929 , 943 et seq., 11 N.W.2d 36 ; Wood v. Tri-States Theater Corp., 237 Iowa 799, 807 , 23 N.W.2d 843, 847 ; Johnson v. Plymouth Gypsum Plaster Co., 174 Iowa 498, 503, 504 , 156 N.W. 721 , 724; Langner v. Caviness, 238 Iowa 774 , 28 N.W.2d 421 , 172 A. L. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.
green
2 sentences1954LaSell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp., 233 Iowa 929 , 943 et seq., 11 N.W.2d 36 ; Wood v. Tri-States Theater Corp., 237 Iowa 799, 807 , 23 N.W.2d 843, 847 ; Johnson v. Plymouth Gypsum Plaster Co., 174 Iowa 498, 503, 504 , 156 N.W. 721 , 724; Langner v. Caviness, 238 Iowa 774 , 28 N.W.2d 421 , 172 A. L. 1954LaSell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp., 233 Iowa 929 , 943 et seq., 11 N.W.2d 36 ; Wood v. Tri-States Theater Corp., 237 Iowa 799, 807 , 23 N.W.2d 843, 847 ; Johnson v. Plymouth Gypsum Plaster Co., 174 Iowa 498, 503, 504 , 156 N.W. 721 , 724; Langner v. Caviness, 238 Iowa 774 , 28 N.W.2d 421 , 172 A. L. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Wood v. Tri-States Theater Corp.
neutral
2 sentences1954LaSell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp., 233 Iowa 929 , 943 et seq., 11 N.W.2d 36 ; Wood v. Tri-States Theater Corp., 237 Iowa 799, 807 , 23 N.W.2d 843, 847 ; Johnson v. Plymouth Gypsum Plaster Co., 174 Iowa 498, 503, 504 , 156 N.W. 721 , 724; Langner v. Caviness, 238 Iowa 774 , 28 N.W.2d 421 , 172 A. L. 1954LaSell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp., 233 Iowa 929 , 943 et seq., 11 N.W.2d 36 ; Wood v. Tri-States Theater Corp., 237 Iowa 799, 807 , 23 N.W.2d 843, 847 ; Johnson v. Plymouth Gypsum Plaster Co., 174 Iowa 498, 503, 504 , 156 N.W. 721 , 724; Langner v. Caviness, 238 Iowa 774 , 28 N.W.2d 421 , 172 A. L. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Horn v. White
neutral
1 sentence1915Haddick v. District Court, 160 Iowa 487 ; Schwilke’s Appeal, 100 Pa. St. 628; State v. Anderson, 84 Term. 321, at 329; Gasque v. Moody, 20 Miss. 153 ; Horn v. White, 127 Ill. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Haddick v. District Court
green
1 sentence1915Haddick v. District Court, 160 Iowa 487 ; Schwilke’s Appeal, 100 Pa. St. 628; State v. Anderson, 84 Term. 321, at 329; Gasque v. Moody, 20 Miss. 153 ; Horn v. White, 127 Ill. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Gasque v. Moody
neutral
1 sentence1915Haddick v. District Court, 160 Iowa 487 ; Schwilke’s Appeal, 100 Pa. St. 628; State v. Anderson, 84 Term. 321, at 329; Gasque v. Moody, 20 Miss. 153 ; Horn v. White, 127 Ill. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.