circumstances test in Nevada

11 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 1948–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (15)

Case	Followed	Cited
Passama v. Stategreen nev · 1987 · cited in 3 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 1998–2020 2 sentences 2020And having considered the totality of the circumstances and the factors outlined in Passama v. State, 103 Nev. 212, 214 , 735 P.2d 321, 323 (1987), we further conclude that the State showed, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Gonzales' statement was voluntary. 2020And having considered the totality of the circumstances and the factors outlined in Passama v. State, 103 Nev. 212, 214 , 735 P.2d 321, 323 (1987), we further conclude that the State showed, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Gonzales' statement was voluntary.	1	3
In Re the Estate of Jothamgreen minn · 2006 · cited in 2 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015Jotham, 722 N.W.2d at 455 . 2015Jotham, 722 N.W.2d at 455.	1	2
Dewey v. Stategreen nev · 2007 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 2 sentences 2020See Dewey v. State, 123 Nev. 483, 492 , 169 P.3d 1149, 1154 (2007). 2020See Dewey v. State, 123 Nev. 483, 492 , 169 P.3d 1149, 1154 (2007).	1	1
Iowa v. Tovargreen scotus · 2004 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a	1	1
Koenig v. Stategreen nev · 1983 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a	1	1
State v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. CT.(PULLIN)green nev · 2008 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a	1	1
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen scotus · 1938 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a	1	1
State v. Freesegreen nev · 2000 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a	1	1
Wyatt v. Stategreen nev · 1970 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a	1	1
Bonds v. Stategreen nev · 1989 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a	1	1
Mills v. Municipal Courtgreen cal · 1973 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008Dist., 515 P.2d 273, 286 (Cal. 1973))). 12 Koenig, 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 13 105 Nev. 827, 828-29 , 784 P.2d 1, 1-2 (1989). 14 See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298 , 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that this court will affirm the judgment of a district court if it reached the correct result for the wrong reason). 15 State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1104 , 13 P.3d 442, 447 (2000) (noting that “[t]he totality of the circumstances test has been the standard for reviewing the validity of guilty pleas for some years”). 16 99 Nev. at 789 , 672 P.2d at 43 . 17 105 Nev. at 829 , 784 P.2d a	1	1
Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurancegreen nev · 1998 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006 2 sentences 2006Assuming a valid waiver under these circumstances, the Enterprise coverage would not have been implicated. 11 See the discussion in Alamo as to why the rules applicable to insurers do not entirely apply to short-term rental agencies providing liability coverage to customers. 114 Nev. 154, 157 , 953 P.2d 1074, 1076 (1998). 2006Assuming a valid waiver under these circumstances, the Enterprise coverage would not have been implicated. 11 See the discussion in Alamo as to why the rules applicable to insurers do not entirely apply to short-term rental agencies providing liability coverage to customers. 114 Nev. 154, 157 , 953 P.2d 1074, 1076 (1998).	1	1
Thompson v. Stategreen nev · 1992 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998However, “a confession obtained by physical intimidation or psychological pressure is inadmissible.” Thompson v. State, 108 Nev. 749, 753 , 838 P.2d 452, 455 (1992) (citations omitted). 1998However, “a confession obtained by physical intimidation or psychological pressure is inadmissible.” Thompson v. State, 108 Nev. 749, 753 , 838 P.2d 452, 455 (1992) (citations omitted).	1	1
Schneckloth v. Bustamontegreen scotus · 1973 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 1 sentence 1998In determining whether a confession is the product of a free will, this court employs a “totality of the circumstances test” to determine “whether the defendant’s will was overborne when he confessed.” Passama, 103 Nev. at 214 , 735 P.2d at 323 ; see also Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973).	1	1
Zelavin v. Tonopah Belmont Development Co.green · 1915 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979 2 sentences 1979We conclude that "in view of all the circumstances the instruction may have misled the jury, and it should not have been given." Zelavin v. Tonopah Belmont, 39 Nev. 1, 7 , 149 P. 188, 189 (1915). 3. 1979We conclude that "in view of all the circumstances the instruction may have misled the jury, and it should not have been given." Zelavin v. Tonopah Belmont, 39 Nev. 1, 7 , 149 P. 188, 189 (1915). 3.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
St. Mary v. Damon green nev · 2013 2 sentences 2026Id. at 656 , 309 P.3d at 1033-34 . 2026Id. at 656 , 309 P.3d at 1033-34 .	1	2026–2026
Miranda v. Arizona green scotus · 1966 1 sentence 2020To the extent appellant argues that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), we disagree.	1	2020–2020
State v. McKiernan green · 1882 1 sentence 1961Instruction No. 11 defined forgery as “the false making, a making with an evil mind, of any written instrument for the purpose of fraud or deceit.” The objection is that “all of the elements of forgery are not present.” This is the language approved in State v. McKiernan, 17 Nev. 224 , 30 P. 831 .	1	1961–1961
Coldwater v. State Highway Commission green mont · 1945 1 sentence 1948We are satisfied both by reason and authority that they are not so liable, first, because (having concluded that neither the statute nor any common law duty contemplated that the individuals personally attend to the heating of the jail, the care of the prisoners, etc.) the appointment of a keeper was a quasi-judicial or discretionary act and not a ministerial act and, secondly, because under the circumstances the immunity of the city from suit extended to the board of councilmen and the individual members could act only as such board. *255 In Coldwater v. State Highway Commission, Mont., 162 P	1	1948–1948

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 126.021 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 126.051 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 126.071 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 126.101 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 214 (1885–2025) CA 182 (1900–2026) PA 125 (1903–2026) IL 121 (1856–2026) TX 115 (1908–2025) OH 76 (1902–2025) FL 62 (1933–2020) NJ 61 (1949–2026) WI 60 (1915–2026) MD 52 (1964–2025) MA 49 (1917–2020) VA 43 (1877–2023) NC 42 (1924–2026) GA 42 (1905–2025) LA 41 (1965–2020) TN 40 (1918–2026) MO 39 (1897–2021) IN 33 (1925–2020) CO 32 (1945–2026) AL 30 (1926–2024) WA 29 (1960–2026) MT 28 (1912–2020) OR 28 (1959–2026) NE 28 (1932–2026) MI 27 (1921–2026) CT 27 (1978–2026) WY 26 (1934–2026) KY 26 (1916–2023) MN 26 (1949–2024) KS 26 (1926–2025) AZ 26 (1963–2022) VT 26 (1913–2026) NM 22 (1990–2023) SD 18 (1940–2024) MS 16 (1921–2020) HI 16 (1925–2021) DC 16 (1973–2024) IA 16 (1915–2023) ND 13 (1974–2012) ID 12 (1925–2024) DE 12 (1977–2026) NV 11 (1948–2026) AR 11 (1956–2001) ME 11 (1965–2022) UT 11 (1985–2024) SC 10 (1925–2024) OK 9 (1910–2021) WV 8 (1940–2026) NH 8 (1973–2021) AK 7 (1976–1996) RI 6 (1971–2012) VI 3 (2006–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check