circumstances hearing (Alaska) · Go Syfert
← Alaska issues

circumstances hearing in Alaska

7 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1976–1996 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Albertgreen
alaska · 1995 · cited in 2 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Cf. State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) (“Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues.”); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm’n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that “there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

1996Cf., State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) ("Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues."); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm'n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that "there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

22
National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Company, Inc., United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenorgreen
ca4 · 1967 · cited in 2 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Cf. State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) (“Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues.”); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm’n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that “there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

1996Cf., State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) ("Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues."); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm'n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that "there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

22
Murray v. Murraygreen
alaska · 1993 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See, e.g., Douglas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 880 P.2d 113, 117 (Alaska 1994); Perry v. Newkirk, 871 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Alaska 1994); Murray v. Murray, 856 P.2d 463, 466-67 (Alaska 1993); Adrian v. Adrian, 838 P.2d 808, 812 (Alaska 1992); Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 (Alaska 1992); Carter v. Brodrick, 816 P.2d 202, 204-205 (Alaska 1991); Smith v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 790 P.2d 1352, 1353 (Alaska 1990); Robbins v. Robbins, 647 P.2d 589, 592 (Alaska 1982).

11
Adrian v. Adriangreen
alaska · 1992 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See, e.g., Douglas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 880 P.2d 113, 117 (Alaska 1994); Perry v. Newkirk, 871 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Alaska 1994); Murray v. Murray, 856 P.2d 463, 466-67 (Alaska 1993); Adrian v. Adrian, 838 P.2d 808, 812 (Alaska 1992); Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 (Alaska 1992); Carter v. Brodrick, 816 P.2d 202, 204-205 (Alaska 1991); Smith v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 790 P.2d 1352, 1353 (Alaska 1990); Robbins v. Robbins, 647 P.2d 589, 592 (Alaska 1982).

11
Perry v. Newkirkgreen
alaska · 1994 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See, e.g., Douglas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 880 P.2d 113, 117 (Alaska 1994); Perry v. Newkirk, 871 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Alaska 1994); Murray v. Murray, 856 P.2d 463, 466-67 (Alaska 1993); Adrian v. Adrian, 838 P.2d 808, 812 (Alaska 1992); Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 (Alaska 1992); Carter v. Brodrick, 816 P.2d 202, 204-205 (Alaska 1991); Smith v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 790 P.2d 1352, 1353 (Alaska 1990); Robbins v. Robbins, 647 P.2d 589, 592 (Alaska 1982).

11
Robbins v. Robbinsgreen
alaska · 1982 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See, e.g., Douglas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 880 P.2d 113, 117 (Alaska 1994); Perry v. Newkirk, 871 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Alaska 1994); Murray v. Murray, 856 P.2d 463, 466-67 (Alaska 1993); Adrian v. Adrian, 838 P.2d 808, 812 (Alaska 1992); Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 (Alaska 1992); Carter v. Brodrick, 816 P.2d 202, 204-205 (Alaska 1991); Smith v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 790 P.2d 1352, 1353 (Alaska 1990); Robbins v. Robbins, 647 P.2d 589, 592 (Alaska 1982).

11
Smith v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Divisiongreen
alaska · 1990 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See, e.g., Douglas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 880 P.2d 113, 117 (Alaska 1994); Perry v. Newkirk, 871 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Alaska 1994); Murray v. Murray, 856 P.2d 463, 466-67 (Alaska 1993); Adrian v. Adrian, 838 P.2d 808, 812 (Alaska 1992); Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 (Alaska 1992); Carter v. Brodrick, 816 P.2d 202, 204-205 (Alaska 1991); Smith v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 790 P.2d 1352, 1353 (Alaska 1990); Robbins v. Robbins, 647 P.2d 589, 592 (Alaska 1982).

11
Douglas v. State, Department of Revenuegreen
alaska · 1994 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See, e.g., Douglas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 880 P.2d 113, 117 (Alaska 1994); Perry v. Newkirk, 871 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Alaska 1994); Murray v. Murray, 856 P.2d 463, 466-67 (Alaska 1993); Adrian v. Adrian, 838 P.2d 808, 812 (Alaska 1992); Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 (Alaska 1992); Carter v. Brodrick, 816 P.2d 202, 204-205 (Alaska 1991); Smith v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 790 P.2d 1352, 1353 (Alaska 1990); Robbins v. Robbins, 647 P.2d 589, 592 (Alaska 1982).

11
Carter v. Brodrickgreen
alaska · 1991 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See, e.g., Douglas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 880 P.2d 113, 117 (Alaska 1994); Perry v. Newkirk, 871 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Alaska 1994); Murray v. Murray, 856 P.2d 463, 466-67 (Alaska 1993); Adrian v. Adrian, 838 P.2d 808, 812 (Alaska 1992); Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 (Alaska 1992); Carter v. Brodrick, 816 P.2d 202, 204-205 (Alaska 1991); Smith v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 790 P.2d 1352, 1353 (Alaska 1990); Robbins v. Robbins, 647 P.2d 589, 592 (Alaska 1982).

11
Epperson v. Eppersongreen
alaska · 1992 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995See, e.g., Douglas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 880 P.2d 113, 117 (Alaska 1994); Perry v. Newkirk, 871 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Alaska 1994); Murray v. Murray, 856 P.2d 463, 466-67 (Alaska 1993); Adrian v. Adrian, 838 P.2d 808, 812 (Alaska 1992); Epperson v. Epperson, 835 P.2d 451, 453 (Alaska 1992); Carter v. Brodrick, 816 P.2d 202, 204-205 (Alaska 1991); Smith v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 790 P.2d 1352, 1353 (Alaska 1990); Robbins v. Robbins, 647 P.2d 589, 592 (Alaska 1982).

11
Hay v. Medical Center Hosp. of Vermontgreen
vt · 1985 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See Hay v. Medical Center Hosp., 145 Vt. 533 , 496 A.2d 939, 943 (1985).

1987See Hay v. Medical Center Hosp., 145 Vt. 533 , 496 A.2d 939, 943 (1985).

11
Cox v. Stategreen
alaska · 1978 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
1 sentence

1982See Cox v. State, 575 P.2d 297, 304 (Alaska 1978).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission green
alaska · 1981
2 sentences

1996Cf. State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) (“Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues.”); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm’n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that “there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

1996Cf., State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) ("Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues."); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm'n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that "there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

21996–1996
Airdo v. United States green
scotus · 1967
2 sentences

1996Cf. State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) (“Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues.”); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm’n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that “there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

1996Cf., State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) ("Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues."); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm'n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that "there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

21996–1996
Jackson v. Wilson green
scotus · 1967
2 sentences

1996Cf. State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) (“Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues.”); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm’n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that “there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

1996Cf., State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 , 105 n. 2 (Alaska 1995) ("Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues."); Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm'n, 635 P.2d 827, 834 (Alaska 1981) (quoting NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917 , 88 S.Ct. 238 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967) (holding that "there is no requirement, constitutionally or otherwise,

21996–1996
Ashmead v. Harris green
iowa · 1983
1 sentence

1988The recognition of this possibility provides, in any given case, the impetus for the insurer to garner information regarding the circumstances of a claim. 336 N.W.2d at 201 (quoting McAlpine, 391 A.2d at 89-90 ).

11988–1988
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McAlpine green
ri · 1978
1 sentence

1988The recognition of this possibility provides, in any given case, the impetus for the insurer to garner information regarding the circumstances of a claim. 336 N.W.2d at 201 (quoting McAlpine, 391 A.2d at 89-90 ).

11988–1988
Keeble v. United States green
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

1976Keeble v. United States, supra 412 U.S. at 208 , 93 S.Ct. at 1995 , 36 L.Ed.2d at 847 . 7 .

1976Keeble v. United States, supra 412 U.S. at 208 , 93 S.Ct. at 1995 , 36 L.Ed.2d at 847 . 7 .

11976–1976

Where else courts name it

NY 214 (1885–2025) CA 182 (1900–2026) PA 125 (1903–2026) IL 121 (1856–2026) TX 115 (1908–2025) OH 76 (1902–2025) FL 62 (1933–2020) NJ 61 (1949–2026) WI 60 (1915–2026) MD 52 (1964–2025) MA 49 (1917–2020) VA 43 (1877–2023) NC 42 (1924–2026) GA 42 (1905–2025) LA 41 (1965–2020) TN 40 (1918–2026) MO 39 (1897–2021) IN 33 (1925–2020) CO 32 (1945–2026) AL 30 (1926–2024) WA 29 (1960–2026) MT 28 (1912–2020) OR 28 (1959–2026) NE 28 (1932–2026) MI 27 (1921–2026) CT 27 (1978–2026) WY 26 (1934–2026) KY 26 (1916–2023) MN 26 (1949–2024) KS 26 (1926–2025) AZ 26 (1963–2022) VT 26 (1913–2026) NM 22 (1990–2023) SD 18 (1940–2024) MS 16 (1921–2020) HI 16 (1925–2021) DC 16 (1973–2024) IA 16 (1915–2023) ND 13 (1974–2012) ID 12 (1925–2024) DE 12 (1977–2026) NV 11 (1948–2026) AR 11 (1956–2001) ME 11 (1965–2022) UT 11 (1985–2024) SC 10 (1925–2024) OK 9 (1910–2021) WV 8 (1940–2026) NH 8 (1973–2021) AK 7 (1976–1996) RI 6 (1971–2012) VI 3 (2006–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check