circumstances test in Maine

11 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 1965–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public Welfaregreen mass · 1975 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 1 sentence 2022Welfare, 330 N.E.2d 180, 190 (1975) (“The APA provisions applicable to adjudicatory proceedings are . . . inapposite, since in the instant circumstances a hearing is not required by constitutional right or by any provision of the General Laws.” (citations and quotation marks omitted)). 42 [¶58] At the time the 2020 lease was granted, there was nothing requiring the Bureau to promulgate rules for granting leases of public reserved lands.	1	1
Department of Health & Human Services v. Pelletiergreen me · 2009 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 1 sentence 2014See Penkul v. Matarazzo, 2009 ME 11 .3, ~ 7, 98.3 A.2d .375.	1	1
State of Maine v. Bartolo P. Fordgreen me · 2013 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014See Ford, 2013 ME 96, ¶ 21 , 82 A.3d 75 (“In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we must assume that [the defendant] was properly advised by his attorneys.”). [¶45] I would affirm the trial court’s judgment or, in the alternative, I would remand for findings so that the totality of the circumstances of Hill’s choice to proceed without counsel could be deferentially reviewed on appeal. 2014See Ford, 2013 ME 96, ¶ 21 , 82 A.3d 75 (“In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we must assume that [the defendant] was properly advised by his attorneys.”). [¶45] I would affirm the trial court’s judgment or, in the alternative, I would remand for findings so that the totality of the circumstances of Hill’s choice to proceed without counsel could be deferentially reviewed on appeal.	1	1
United States v. Leon-Delfisgreen ca1 · 2000 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 1 sentence 2009See United States v. Leon-Delfts, 203 F.3d 103, 111 (1st Gr. 2000).	1	1
State v. Knowltongreen me · 1985 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 1 sentence 1998Under the totality of the circumstances test, “an informant’s ‘veracity,’ ‘reliability,’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ are all highly relevant in determining the value of his report.” State v. Knowlton, 489 A.2d 529, 531 (Me.1985) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. at 230 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 (1983)).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

Case	Cited	Years
State of Maine v. Timothy M. Hunt green me · 2016 2 sentences 2018This appears to be the proper analysis for circumstances such as these where a defendant's mental health status is a major factor in the voluntariness determination·. 15 i I i I coercion."); Hunt, 2016 ME 172 , ~ 19, 151 A.3d 911 (noting that when a confession was not I "'forced' out of [the defendant], we examine whether admission ofhis confession violated his right to due process."). 2018This appears to be the proper analysis for circumstances such as these where a defendant's mental health status is a major factor in the voluntariness determination·. 15 i I i I coercion."); Hunt, 2016 ME 172 , ~ 19, 151 A.3d 911 (noting that when a confession was not I "'forced' out of [the defendant], we examine whether admission ofhis confession violated his right to due process.").	1	2018–2018
Steiner Corp. v. Benninghoff Ex Rel. Benninghoff Trust green nvd · 1998 1 sentence 2003Additionally, although projected earnings should not be based simply on averages of past earnings data, Steiner, 5 F.Supp.2d at 1130 — particularly in the circumstances at bar, where a new product line was to be introduced --, a company’s earnings history and the condition of the industry as a whole are proper considerations, as is noted above.	1	2003–2003
Citron v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. green delch · 1990 1 sentence 2003Citron, 584 A.2d at 509 .	1	2003–2003
Selby v. Cumberland County green me · 2002 1 sentence 2002See 14 M.R.S.A. § 8104-B(3) (immunity for negligent performance of discretionary functions); Selby, 2002 ME 80 , J 7, --- A.2d at --- (“An act qualifies as a discretionary function is the act is essential to the realization or accomplishment of a basic governmental policy program or objective . . . and requires the exercise of basic _policy evaluation, judgment and expertise on the part of the governmental employee involved.”) (citation, internal punctuation and emphasis deleted)).	1	2002–2002
Hanson v. Hanson green me · 1995 1 sentence 2002The court acknowledges that the “better practice” would have been to make the retention of jurisdiction “explicit.” Hanson, 654 A.2d at 425 n.3.	1	2002–2002
Illinois v. Gates green scotus · 1983 2 sentences 1998Under the totality of the circumstances test, “an informant’s ‘veracity,’ ‘reliability,’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ are all highly relevant in determining the value of his report.” State v. Knowlton, 489 A.2d 529, 531 (Me.1985) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. at 230 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 (1983)). 1998Under the totality of the circumstances test, “an informant’s ‘veracity,’ ‘reliability,’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ are all highly relevant in determining the value of his report.” State v. Knowlton, 489 A.2d 529, 531 (Me.1985) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. at 230 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 (1983)).	1	1998–1998
State v. Munsey green me · 1956 2 sentences 1977State v. Munsey, 152 Me. 198 , 127 A.2d 79 (1956). 1977State v. Munsey, 152 Me. 198 , 127 A.2d 79 (1956).	1	1977–1977
Cicenia v. Lagay green scotus · 1958 2 sentences 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965
Spano v. New York green scotus · 1959 2 sentences 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965
Crooker v. California red scotus · 1958 2 sentences 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965
Haley v. Ohio green scotus · 1948 2 sentences 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965
Lynumn v. Illinois green scotus · 1963 1 sentence 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965
Gallegos v. Colorado green scotus · 1962 2 sentences 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965
Culombe v. Connecticut green scotus · 1961 2 sentences 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965
Haynes v. Washington green scotus · 1963 2 sentences 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965
Escobedo v. Illinois green scotus · 1964 2 sentences 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of 1965We take particular note of the following cases which serve to demonstrate the development of the applicable law in the past twenty years: Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, supra; Haley v. State of Ohio (1948), 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S. Ct. 302 ; Crooker v. State of California (1958), 357 U.S. 433 , 78 S. Ct. 1287 ; Cicenia v. La Gay (1958), 357 U.S. 504 , 78 S. Ct. 1297 ; Spano v. People of the State of New York (1959), 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S. Ct. 1202 ; Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 367 U.S. 568 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 ; Gallegos v. State of Colorado (1962), 370 U.S. 49 , 82 S. Ct. 1209 ; Haynes v. State of	1	1965–1965

Where else courts name it

NY 214 (1885–2025) CA 182 (1900–2026) PA 125 (1903–2026) IL 121 (1856–2026) TX 115 (1908–2025) OH 76 (1902–2025) FL 62 (1933–2020) NJ 61 (1949–2026) WI 60 (1915–2026) MD 52 (1964–2025) MA 49 (1917–2020) VA 43 (1877–2023) NC 42 (1924–2026) GA 42 (1905–2025) LA 41 (1965–2020) TN 40 (1918–2026) MO 39 (1897–2021) IN 33 (1925–2020) CO 32 (1945–2026) AL 30 (1926–2024) WA 29 (1960–2026) MT 28 (1912–2020) OR 28 (1959–2026) NE 28 (1932–2026) MI 27 (1921–2026) CT 27 (1978–2026) WY 26 (1934–2026) KY 26 (1916–2023) MN 26 (1949–2024) KS 26 (1926–2025) AZ 26 (1963–2022) VT 26 (1913–2026) NM 22 (1990–2023) SD 18 (1940–2024) MS 16 (1921–2020) HI 16 (1925–2021) DC 16 (1973–2024) IA 16 (1915–2023) ND 13 (1974–2012) ID 12 (1925–2024) DE 12 (1977–2026) NV 11 (1948–2026) AR 11 (1956–2001) ME 11 (1965–2022) UT 11 (1985–2024) SC 10 (1925–2024) OK 9 (1910–2021) WV 8 (1940–2026) NH 8 (1973–2021) AK 7 (1976–1996) RI 6 (1971–2012) VI 3 (2006–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check