Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1896–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. Craig Anthony Finneygreen2 sentences2017See Finney, 834 N.W.2d at 58 . 2017Id. | 1 | 3 |
City of Sioux City v. Iowa Department of Revenue & Financegreen1 sentence2018City of Sioux City v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 666 N.W.2d 587 , 592 (Iowa 2003) ("The fact that this administrative rule has been in effect for eleven years strongly cautions against finding the rule invalid."); City of Marion v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 643 N.W.2d 205 , 208 (Iowa 2002) ("We have recognized that if the meaning of the statute that is subject to administrative implementation is subject to doubt and has been made the object of a rule of long-standing, we should give weight to the administrative interpretation."); accord Smith v. City of Jackson , 544 U.S. 228 , 239, 1 | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. City of Jacksongreen2 sentences2018City of Sioux City v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 666 N.W.2d 587 , 592 (Iowa 2003) ("The fact that this administrative rule has been in effect for eleven years strongly cautions against finding the rule invalid."); City of Marion v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 643 N.W.2d 205 , 208 (Iowa 2002) ("We have recognized that if the meaning of the statute that is subject to administrative implementation is subject to doubt and has been made the object of a rule of long-standing, we should give weight to the administrative interpretation."); accord Smith v. City of Jackson , 544 U.S. 228 , 239, 1 2018City of Sioux City v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 666 N.W.2d 587 , 592 (Iowa 2003) ("The fact that this administrative rule has been in effect for eleven years strongly cautions against finding the rule invalid."); City of Marion v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 643 N.W.2d 205 , 208 (Iowa 2002) ("We have recognized that if the meaning of the statute that is subject to administrative implementation is subject to doubt and has been made the object of a rule of long-standing, we should give weight to the administrative interpretation."); accord Smith v. City of Jackson , 544 U.S. 228 , 239, 1 | 1 | 1 |
City of Marion v. Iowa Department of Revenue & Financegreen1 sentence2018City of Sioux City v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 666 N.W.2d 587 , 592 (Iowa 2003) ("The fact that this administrative rule has been in effect for eleven years strongly cautions against finding the rule invalid."); City of Marion v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 643 N.W.2d 205 , 208 (Iowa 2002) ("We have recognized that if the meaning of the statute that is subject to administrative implementation is subject to doubt and has been made the object of a rule of long-standing, we should give weight to the administrative interpretation."); accord Smith v. City of Jackson , 544 U.S. 228 , 239, 1 | 1 | 1 |
Rolfe State Bank v. Charles a. Gunderson and Gloria K. Gunderson, Margaret Gunderson Moore, Clara Gunderson Hoover and Harold M. Hoover, Helen D. Gunderson, Deane C. Gunderson and Martha G. Carlsongreen1 sentence2016Rolfe State Bank v. Gunderson, 794 N.W.2d 561, 565-66 (Iowa 2011) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Clarion Ready Mixed Concrete Co. v. Iowa State Tax Commissiongreen2 sentences2002Clarion Ready Mixed Concrete Co. v. Iowa State Tax Comm’n, 252 Iowa 500, 507 , 107 N.W.2d 553, 558 (1961); N.W. 2002Clarion Ready Mixed Concrete Co. v. Iowa State Tax Comm’n, 252 Iowa 500, 507 , 107 N.W.2d 553, 558 (1961); N.W. | 1 | 1 |
Ruby Ex Rel. Ruby v. Eastongreen1 sentence1981Ruby v. Easton, 207 N.W.2d 10, 14-15 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.
green
2 sentences2018City of Sioux City v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 666 N.W.2d 587 , 592 (Iowa 2003) ("The fact that this administrative rule has been in effect for eleven years strongly cautions against finding the rule invalid."); City of Marion v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 643 N.W.2d 205 , 208 (Iowa 2002) ("We have recognized that if the meaning of the statute that is subject to administrative implementation is subject to doubt and has been made the object of a rule of long-standing, we should give weight to the administrative interpretation."); accord Smith v. City of Jackson , 544 U.S. 228 , 239, 1 2018City of Sioux City v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 666 N.W.2d 587 , 592 (Iowa 2003) ("The fact that this administrative rule has been in effect for eleven years strongly cautions against finding the rule invalid."); City of Marion v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 643 N.W.2d 205 , 208 (Iowa 2002) ("We have recognized that if the meaning of the statute that is subject to administrative implementation is subject to doubt and has been made the object of a rule of long-standing, we should give weight to the administrative interpretation."); accord Smith v. City of Jackson , 544 U.S. 228 , 239, 1 | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor
green
2 sentences2018City of Sioux City v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 666 N.W.2d 587 , 592 (Iowa 2003) ("The fact that this administrative rule has been in effect for eleven years strongly cautions against finding the rule invalid."); City of Marion v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 643 N.W.2d 205 , 208 (Iowa 2002) ("We have recognized that if the meaning of the statute that is subject to administrative implementation is subject to doubt and has been made the object of a rule of long-standing, we should give weight to the administrative interpretation."); accord Smith v. City of Jackson , 544 U.S. 228 , 239, 1 2018City of Sioux City v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 666 N.W.2d 587 , 592 (Iowa 2003) ("The fact that this administrative rule has been in effect for eleven years strongly cautions against finding the rule invalid."); City of Marion v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 643 N.W.2d 205 , 208 (Iowa 2002) ("We have recognized that if the meaning of the statute that is subject to administrative implementation is subject to doubt and has been made the object of a rule of long-standing, we should give weight to the administrative interpretation."); accord Smith v. City of Jackson , 544 U.S. 228 , 239, 1 | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Schultz
green
1 sentence2011In the end, the object of our inquiry is to seek a result “ ‘that will advance, rather than defeat, the statute’s purpose.’ ” Klinge, 725 N.W.2d at 18 (quoting Schultz, 604 N.W.2d at 62 ). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Klinge v. Bentien
green
1 sentence2011In the end, the object of our inquiry is to seek a result “ ‘that will advance, rather than defeat, the statute’s purpose.’ ” Klinge, 725 N.W.2d at 18 (quoting Schultz, 604 N.W.2d at 62 ). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Moseley v. Ricks
green
2 sentences1983Id. at 1041-42 , 274 N.W. at 24 . 1983Id. at 1041-42 , 274 N.W. at 24 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Deke v. Huenkemeier
neutral
2 sentences1935The cardinal principle in all such cases is, that the property of the debtor shall not be diverted from the payment of his debts to the injury of his creditors, by means of the fraud.” We quote the following from an Illinois case: “The object or doctrine of constructive fraud is to protect some right or interest, which, in equity, ought to be preserved, against the effect of a conveyance which is in other respects valid; and therefore, equity does not avoid the deed altogether, but saves against it the rights of interests which are to be protected.” Deke v. Huenkemeier, 260 Ill. 131 , 102 N. E 1935The cardinal principle in all such cases is, that the property of the debtor shall not be diverted from the payment of his debts to the injury of his creditors, by means of the fraud.” We quote the following from an Illinois case: “The object or doctrine of constructive fraud is to protect some right or interest, which, in equity, ought to be preserved, against the effect of a conveyance which is in other respects valid; and therefore, equity does not avoid the deed altogether, but saves against it the rights of interests which are to be protected.” Deke v. Huenkemeier, 260 Ill. 131 , 102 N. E | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Parnham v. Weeks
neutral
1 sentence1919In Parnham v. Weeks, 185 Iowa 455 , there are brief points which concisely state a rule of law, and cite support by authorities. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Mertes
neutral
2 sentences1904Union Pacific v. Mertes, 35 Neb. 204 ( 52 N. W. 1904Union Pacific v. Mertes, 35 Neb. 204 ( 52 N. W. | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Blann v. Crocheron
neutral
1 sentence1902Blann v. Crocheron, 20 Ala. 320 . | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Murray v. Ballou
green
1 sentence1900Bennett Lis Pendens, section 12; Murray v. Ballou, 1 Johns. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
State ex rel. Cosgrove v. Perkins
green
2 sentences1899Cosgrove v. Perkins, 139 Mo. 106 ( 40 S. W. 1899Cosgrove v. Perkins, 139 Mo. 106 ( 40 S. W. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Briggs v. Ewart
green
1 sentence1896In Briggs v. Ewart, 51 Mo. 245 ( 11 Am. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.