Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1914–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Foley v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2021A deficient performance causes a “defendant to lose what he otherwise would probably have won” and results in a “defeat . . . snatched from the hands of probable victory.” Bronk v. Commonwealth, 58 S.W.3d 482, 487 (Ky. 2001) (quoting Foley v. Commonwealth, 17 S.W.3d 878, 884 (Ky. 2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Centers v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2021Under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2068 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), Goben must show his counsel’s performance was incompetent and prejudiced him because it fell below an object standard of reasonableness, and there is a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been different but for counsel’s errors. -5- “In determining whether the degree of skill exercised by the attorney meets the proper standard of care, the attorney’s performance is judged by the degree of its departure from the quality of conduct customarily provided by the legal pr | 1 | 1 |
Bronk v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2021A deficient performance causes a “defendant to lose what he otherwise would probably have won” and results in a “defeat . . . snatched from the hands of probable victory.” Bronk v. Commonwealth, 58 S.W.3d 482, 487 (Ky. 2001) (quoting Foley v. Commonwealth, 17 S.W.3d 878, 884 (Ky. 2000)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harp v. Southern Railway Co.
neutral
2 sentences1931Co., 150 Ky. 564 , 150 S. W. 663 , while the doctrine was expressly recognized and approved, it was held not to apply where the parties had consented in an agreed suit to a submission of a part only of the issues growing' out of a single cause of action, the court stating its reasons for refusing to apply the rule to that case as follows: “ ‘When it is considered that the object of the rule against splitting causes of action is to protect the defendant from unnecessary vexation and cost, it cannot be said that this rule is violated when the defendant consents that a part only of a matter in di 1931Co., 150 Ky. 564 , 150 S. W. 663 , while the doctrine was expressly recognized and approved, it was held not to apply where the parties had consented in an agreed suit to a submission of a part only of the issues growing' out of a single cause of action, the court stating its reasons for refusing to apply the rule to that case as follows: “ ‘When it is considered that the object of the rule against splitting causes of action is to protect the defendant from unnecessary vexation and cost, it cannot be said that this rule is violated when the defendant consents that a part only of a matter in di | 2 | 1916–1931 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2021Under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2068 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), Goben must show his counsel’s performance was incompetent and prejudiced him because it fell below an object standard of reasonableness, and there is a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been different but for counsel’s errors. -5- “In determining whether the degree of skill exercised by the attorney meets the proper standard of care, the attorney’s performance is judged by the degree of its departure from the quality of conduct customarily provided by the legal pr 2021Under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2068 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), Goben must show his counsel’s performance was incompetent and prejudiced him because it fell below an object standard of reasonableness, and there is a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been different but for counsel’s errors. -5- “In determining whether the degree of skill exercised by the attorney meets the proper standard of care, the attorney’s performance is judged by the degree of its departure from the quality of conduct customarily provided by the legal pr | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Belmer v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2019He had no reason to believe this interrogation room was a “sanctuary for private discussions.” 553 S.E.2d at 128-29 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Harrison v. Lebanon Water-works
neutral
2 sentences1935L. sec. 21, discussing this rule requiring finality of decision in the order or judgment as essential for taking appeal therefrom, the reason for the rule is thus stated, “The object of this requirement is to present the whole cause for determination in a single appeal and thus prevent the unnecessary expense and delay of repeated appeals,” and to such end section 22 further states, as defining a final judgment or decree so required for an appeal to be taken therefrom, that it is one “which disposes of the cause, * * * reserving no further questions or directions for future determination,” and 1935L. sec. 21, discussing this rule requiring finality of decision in the order or judgment as essential for taking appeal therefrom, the reason for the rule is thus stated, “The object of this requirement is to present the whole cause for determination in a single appeal and thus prevent the unnecessary expense and delay of repeated appeals,” and to such end section 22 further states, as defining a final judgment or decree so required for an appeal to be taken therefrom, that it is one “which disposes of the cause, * * * reserving no further questions or directions for future determination,” and | 1 | 1935–1935 |
United States v. American Tobacco Co.
yellow
1 sentence1914This is involved in the reservation of the visitatorial powers of the State and in the authority of the National Government where the corporate activities are in the domain subject to the powers of Congress.” See also U. S. v. American Tobacco, 146 Fed., 557 ; In re American Sugar Refining Company, 178 Fed., 109 . 3. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
In re American Sugar Refining Co.
green
1 sentence1914This is involved in the reservation of the visitatorial powers of the State and in the authority of the National Government where the corporate activities are in the domain subject to the powers of Congress.” See also U. S. v. American Tobacco, 146 Fed., 557 ; In re American Sugar Refining Company, 178 Fed., 109 . 3. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.