16 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 1917–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Wickershamgreen1 sentence1992See, e.g., People v. Wickersham (Cal. 1982), 650 P.2d 311 ; State v. Coward (N.C.App. 1981), 283 S.E.2d 536 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re Gallagher's Willgreen2 sentences1964Certainly the vitality of our legal system derives in large part from the function of our courts in applying its root concepts, among them that of equal treatment, to ever new and diversified problems.” In re Gallagher’s Will, 57 N.M. 112 , 255 P.2d 317, 326, 328 , (1953). 1964Certainly the vitality of our legal system derives in large part from the function of our courts in applying its root concepts, among them that of equal treatment, to ever new and diversified problems.” In re Gallagher’s Will, 57 N.M. 112 , 255 P.2d 317, 326, 328 , (1953). | 1 | 1 |
| Draper v. Woodgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Albert v. Hastetter
green
2 sentences2023“Montana has consistently followed the minority rule, which holds that open, notorious, continuous, uninterrupted and exclusive use raises a presumption that the use was also adverse.” Albert v. Hastetter, 2002 MT 123, ¶ 20 , 310 Mont. 82 , 48 P.3d 749 (collecting cases). 2023“Montana has consistently followed the minority rule, which holds that open, notorious, continuous, uninterrupted and exclusive use raises a presumption that the use was also adverse.” Albert v. Hastetter, 2002 MT 123, ¶ 20 , 310 Mont. 82 , 48 P.3d 749 (collecting cases). | 2 | 2011–2023 |
Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger
green
2 sentences2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . 2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . | 2 | 2002–2004 |
Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust
green
2 sentences2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . 2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . | 2 | 2002–2004 |
Wareing v. Schreckendgust
green
2 sentences2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . 2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . | 2 | 2002–2004 |
Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers
green
2 sentences2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . 2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . | 2 | 2002–2004 |
Glantz v. Gabel
green
2 sentences2002Renner , ¶ 13; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), *88 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc. (1996), 275 Mont. 414, 425 , 913 P.2d 641, 648 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 ; Glantz v. Gabel (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858, 860 . 2002Renner , ¶ 13; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), *88 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc. (1996), 275 Mont. 414, 425 , 913 P.2d 641, 648 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 ; Glantz v. Gabel (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858, 860 . | 2 | 1978–2002 |
Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. Glaus
green
2 sentences2023“If the claimant establishes the elements of prescriptive use, there is a presumption that the use is adverse to the servient estate and the burden shifts to the owner of the servient estate to show that the use was permissive.” Lyndes v. Green, 2014 MT 110, ¶ 17 , 374 Mont. 510 , 325 P.3d 1225 (citing Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. Glaus, 2003 MT 236, ¶ 21 , 317 Mont. 236 , 77 P.3d 175 ). 2023“If the claimant establishes the elements of prescriptive use, there is a presumption that the use is adverse to the servient estate and the burden shifts to the owner of the servient estate to show that the use was permissive.” Lyndes v. Green, 2014 MT 110, ¶ 17 , 374 Mont. 510 , 325 P.3d 1225 (citing Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. Glaus, 2003 MT 236, ¶ 21 , 317 Mont. 236 , 77 P.3d 175 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Lyndes v. Green
green
2 sentences2023“If the claimant establishes the elements of prescriptive use, there is a presumption that the use is adverse to the servient estate and the burden shifts to the owner of the servient estate to show that the use was permissive.” Lyndes v. Green, 2014 MT 110, ¶ 17 , 374 Mont. 510 , 325 P.3d 1225 (citing Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. Glaus, 2003 MT 236, ¶ 21 , 317 Mont. 236 , 77 P.3d 175 ). 2023“If the claimant establishes the elements of prescriptive use, there is a presumption that the use is adverse to the servient estate and the burden shifts to the owner of the servient estate to show that the use was permissive.” Lyndes v. Green, 2014 MT 110, ¶ 17 , 374 Mont. 510 , 325 P.3d 1225 (citing Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. Glaus, 2003 MT 236, ¶ 21 , 317 Mont. 236 , 77 P.3d 175 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Leisz v. Avista Corp.
green
2 sentences2011Heller , ¶ 14; see also Albert, ¶ 20 (occasional recreational use is insufficient to raise the presumption of adverse use); Leisz v. Avista Corp., 2007 MT 347, ¶ 16 , 340 Mont. 294 , 174 P.3d 481 (unexplained use cannot form a basis for a claim of prescriptive right). 2011Heller , ¶ 14; see also Albert, ¶ 20 (occasional recreational use is insufficient to raise the presumption of adverse use); Leisz v. Avista Corp., 2007 MT 347, ¶ 16 , 340 Mont. 294 , 174 P.3d 481 (unexplained use cannot form a basis for a claim of prescriptive right). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Renner v. Nemitz
green
2 sentences2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . 2004Albert , ¶ 20; Renner v. Nemitz, 2001 MT 202, ¶ 13 , 306 Mont. 292, ¶ 13 , 33 P.3d 255, ¶ 13 ; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc.
green
2 sentences2002Renner , ¶ 13; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), *88 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc. (1996), 275 Mont. 414, 425 , 913 P.2d 641, 648 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 ; Glantz v. Gabel (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858, 860 . 2002Renner , ¶ 13; Wareing, 280 Mont. at 209 , 930 P.2d at 45 ; Warnack v. Coneen Family Trust (1996), *88 278 Mont. 80, 83 , 923 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc. (1996), 275 Mont. 414, 425 , 913 P.2d 641, 648 ; Lemont Land Corp. v. Rogers (1994), 269 Mont. 180, 185 , 887 P.2d 724, 727-28 ; Mountain View Cemetery v. Granger (1978), 175 Mont. 351, 356 , 574 P.2d 254, 257 ; Glantz v. Gabel (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858, 860 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
green
1 sentence2000Co. (Kan. 1998), 961 P.2d 1213 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Johnson v. Division of Motor Vehicles
green
2 sentences1994In Johnson v. Division of Motor Vehicles (1985), 219 Mont. 310 , 711 P.2d 815 , we quoted the following reasoning: [P]ermitting a delayed test at the subsequent offer of the motorist would require officers to wait and see if there was a change of mind by the refusing motorist, and would require officers to forego other responsibilities in order to arrange the belated test — all contrary to the clear intent behind the implied consent law that the test be submitted and completed expeditiously. [Citation omitted.] Johnson, 711 P.2d at 818 . 1994In Johnson v. Division of Motor Vehicles (1985), 219 Mont. 310 , 711 P.2d 815 , we quoted the following reasoning: [P]ermitting a delayed test at the subsequent offer of the motorist would require officers to wait and see if there was a change of mind by the refusing motorist, and would require officers to forego other responsibilities in order to arrange the belated test — all contrary to the clear intent behind the implied consent law that the test be submitted and completed expeditiously. [Citation omitted.] Johnson, 711 P.2d at 818 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.
green
1 sentence1994E.g., Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Division, Department of Transportation (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983), 666 P.2d 524, 527-28 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Coward
green
1 sentence1992See, e.g., People v. Wickersham (Cal. 1982), 650 P.2d 311 ; State v. Coward (N.C.App. 1981), 283 S.E.2d 536 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Allied Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Peoples National Bank
green
2 sentences1989The minority rule is based upon the rule or statute that there is but one action for the recovery of a debt which is secured by collateral.’ ” 518 P.2d at 739 . 1989The minority rule is based upon the rule or statute that there is but one action for the recovery of a debt which is secured by collateral. 518 P.2d at 739 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
McPherson v. Monegan
green
2 sentences1982McPherson v. Monegan (1947), 120 Mont. 454 , 187 P.2d 542 . 1982McPherson v. Monegan (1947), 120 Mont. 454 , 187 P.2d 542 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences1979For example, contribution for one-half of the benefits was allowed by the United States Supreme Court in Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company v. United States (1963), 372 U.S. 597 , 83 S.Ct. 926 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1 , even though the Federal Employees Compensation Act, which covered the employer was indicated as the exclusive remedy against the employer. 1979For example, contribution for one-half of the benefits was allowed by the United States Supreme Court in Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company v. United States (1963), 372 U.S. 597 , 83 S.Ct. 926 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1 , even though the Federal Employees Compensation Act, which covered the employer was indicated as the exclusive remedy against the employer. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Te Selle v. Storey
green
2 sentences1978Taylor v. Petranek, supra; Lunceford v. Trenk (1974), 163 Mont. 504, 508 , 518 P.2d 266 ; O’Connor v. Brodie (1969), 153 Mont. 129, 139 , 454 P.2d 920 ; Scott v. Weinheimer, supra; TeSelle v. Storey (1957), 133 Mont. 1, 5 , 319 P.2d 218 ; Glantz v. Gable (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858 . 1978Taylor v. Petranek, supra; Lunceford v. Trenk (1974), 163 Mont. 504, 508 , 518 P.2d 266 ; O’Connor v. Brodie (1969), 153 Mont. 129, 139 , 454 P.2d 920 ; Scott v. Weinheimer, supra; TeSelle v. Storey (1957), 133 Mont. 1, 5 , 319 P.2d 218 ; Glantz v. Gable (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
O'CONNOR v. Brodie
green
2 sentences1978Taylor v. Petranek, supra; Lunceford v. Trenk (1974), 163 Mont. 504, 508 , 518 P.2d 266 ; O’Connor v. Brodie (1969), 153 Mont. 129, 139 , 454 P.2d 920 ; Scott v. Weinheimer, supra; TeSelle v. Storey (1957), 133 Mont. 1, 5 , 319 P.2d 218 ; Glantz v. Gable (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858 . 1978Taylor v. Petranek, supra; Lunceford v. Trenk (1974), 163 Mont. 504, 508 , 518 P.2d 266 ; O’Connor v. Brodie (1969), 153 Mont. 129, 139 , 454 P.2d 920 ; Scott v. Weinheimer, supra; TeSelle v. Storey (1957), 133 Mont. 1, 5 , 319 P.2d 218 ; Glantz v. Gable (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Lunceford v. Trenk
green
2 sentences1978Taylor v. Petranek, supra; Lunceford v. Trenk (1974), 163 Mont. 504, 508 , 518 P.2d 266 ; O’Connor v. Brodie (1969), 153 Mont. 129, 139 , 454 P.2d 920 ; Scott v. Weinheimer, supra; TeSelle v. Storey (1957), 133 Mont. 1, 5 , 319 P.2d 218 ; Glantz v. Gable (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858 . 1978Taylor v. Petranek, supra; Lunceford v. Trenk (1974), 163 Mont. 504, 508 , 518 P.2d 266 ; O’Connor v. Brodie (1969), 153 Mont. 129, 139 , 454 P.2d 920 ; Scott v. Weinheimer, supra; TeSelle v. Storey (1957), 133 Mont. 1, 5 , 319 P.2d 218 ; Glantz v. Gable (1923), 66 Mont. 134, 141 , 212 P. 858 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Mosier v. Carney
green
2 sentences1975Angvall, supra. Respondents cite the minority rule allowing interspousal tort actions by judicial modification of the common law rule, as stated in Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N.W.2d 343 , and citations contained therein. 1975Angvall, supra. Respondents cite the minority rule allowing interspousal tort actions by judicial modification of the common law rule, as stated in Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N.W.2d 343 , and citations contained therein. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Cullen v. Peschel
neutral
2 sentences1961In Cullen v. Peschel, 115 Mont. 187 , 142 P.2d 559 , the actual holding was that the plaintiff’s theory was inherently improbable in light of all of the facts present in the case. 1961In Cullen v. Peschel, 115 Mont. 187 , 142 P.2d 559 , the actual holding was that the plaintiff’s theory was inherently improbable in light of all of the facts present in the case. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Putnam v. Putnam
green
2 sentences1961In Putnam v. Putnam, 86 Mont. 135 , 282 P. 855 , the minority rule was cited although it was not necessary to the decision since all of the testimony concerning the specific point involved denied the right of the plaintiff to recover and there was no need to take his testimony at its weakest. 1961In Putnam v. Putnam, 86 Mont. 135 , 282 P. 855 , the minority rule was cited although it was not necessary to the decision since all of the testimony concerning the specific point involved denied the right of the plaintiff to recover and there was no need to take his testimony at its weakest. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Severy v. Central Pacific Railroad
green
1 sentence1947Co., 51 Cal. 194 , involving a description as running “along the easterly line”; Warden v. South Pasadena Realty [& improvement] Co. 178 Al. 440, 174 Pac. 26 , the conveyance reading, “along the southerly line”; Cottle v. Young, 59 Me. 105 , the description being, “running on the westerly line”; Fearing v. Irwin, 4 Daly, N. Y., 385, the description involved, “along the easterly side.” In support of the minority rule that a boundary to and with the side of a street carries the fee to the center of the street unless the contrary intent appears from the deed, the case of City of Nashville v. Lawr | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Cottle v. Young
neutral
1 sentence1947Co., 51 Cal. 194 , involving a description as running “along the easterly line”; Warden v. South Pasadena Realty [& improvement] Co. 178 Al. 440, 174 Pac. 26 , the conveyance reading, “along the southerly line”; Cottle v. Young, 59 Me. 105 , the description being, “running on the westerly line”; Fearing v. Irwin, 4 Daly, N. Y., 385, the description involved, “along the easterly side.” In support of the minority rule that a boundary to and with the side of a street carries the fee to the center of the street unless the contrary intent appears from the deed, the case of City of Nashville v. Lawr | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Warden v. S. Pasadena Realty & Improvement Co.
green
1 sentence1947Co., 51 Cal. 194 , involving a description as running “along the easterly line”; Warden v. South Pasadena Realty [& improvement] Co. 178 Al. 440, 174 Pac. 26 , the conveyance reading, “along the southerly line”; Cottle v. Young, 59 Me. 105 , the description being, “running on the westerly line”; Fearing v. Irwin, 4 Daly, N. Y., 385, the description involved, “along the easterly side.” In support of the minority rule that a boundary to and with the side of a street carries the fee to the center of the street unless the contrary intent appears from the deed, the case of City of Nashville v. Lawr | 1 | 1947–1947 |
City of Nashville v. Lawrence
green
2 sentences1947Co., 51 Cal. 194 , involving a description as running “along the easterly line”; Warden v. South Pasadena Realty [& improvement] Co. 178 Al. 440, 174 Pac. 26 , the conveyance reading, “along the southerly line”; Cottle v. Young, 59 Me. 105 , the description being, “running on the westerly line”; Fearing v. Irwin, 4 Daly, N. Y., 385, the description involved, “along the easterly side.” In support of the minority rule that a boundary to and with the side of a street carries the fee to the center of the street unless the contrary intent appears from the deed, the case of City of Nashville v. Lawr 1947Co., 51 Cal. 194 , involving a description as running “along the easterly line”; Warden v. South Pasadena Realty [& improvement] Co. 178 Al. 440, 174 Pac. 26 , the conveyance reading, “along the southerly line”; Cottle v. Young, 59 Me. 105 , the description being, “running on the westerly line”; Fearing v. Irwin, 4 Daly, N. Y., 385, the description involved, “along the easterly side.” In support of the minority rule that a boundary to and with the side of a street carries the fee to the center of the street unless the contrary intent appears from the deed, the case of City of Nashville v. Lawr | 1 | 1947–1947 |
| Palmer v. Poor green | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.