minority rule (Wyoming) · Go Syfert
← Wyoming issues

minority rule in Wyoming

7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1954–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Burkegreen
ca10 · 2011 · cited in 1 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Rose , 538 F.3d at 182 ; see also Burke , 633 F.3d at 989 -90 . 5 [¶37] In contrast to the majority rule, the minority rule allows for a plain error review if the record is sufficiently developed to support such a review.

11
United States v. Rosegreen
ca3 · 2008 · cited in 1 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019Rose , 538 F.3d at 182 ; see also Burke , 633 F.3d at 989 -90 . 5 [¶37] In contrast to the majority rule, the minority rule allows for a plain error review if the record is sufficiently developed to support such a review.

2019See Rose , 538 F.3d at 181 (citing cases).

11
Voninski v. Voninskigreen
tennctapp · 1982 · cited in 1 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992See Voninski, 661 S.W.2d 872 . [15] There is also a minority rule which finds jurisdiction exists in the non-decree present home state without relinquishment by the decree state despite PKPA and UCCJA controlling language.

1992See Voninski, 661 S.W.2d 872 . .

11
Christie v. Christiegreen
kyctapphigh · 1928 · cited in 1 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 1954–1954
2 sentences

1954See Christie v. Christie, 223 Ky. 539 , 4 S.W. (2d) 375 , wherein it was held that the wife may apply to the court in the divorce proceeding and have the decree modified so as to compel the husband to contribute to the support of the minor children, and if she is able to serve notice upon the former husband she cannot recover a judgment for past support.

1954See Christie v. Christie, 223 Ky. 539 , 4 S.W. (2d) 375 , wherein it was held that the wife may apply to the court in the divorce proceeding and have the decree modified so as to compel the husband to contribute to the support of the minor children, and if she is able to serve notice upon the former husband she cannot recover a judgment for past support.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (26)

CaseCitedYears
Groenstein v. Groenstein green
wyo · 2005
2 sentences

2011We agreed with that result, albeit without discussion as to rationale, in dictum found in G@roenstein, 2005 WY 6 , 180 n2, 104 P.3d at 774 n.2, where we said: "Should the support obligation be less than the dependency benefit, the non-custodial parent owes no additional amount, but he is not entitled to a rebate." (Emphasis added.) [18] The district court in this case denied Father's sought-after credit against pre-disability arrearages, but it did so by following the minority rule.

2011We agreed with that result, albeit without discussion as to rationale, in dictum found in G@roenstein, 2005 WY 6 , 180 n2, 104 P.3d at 774 n.2, where we said: "Should the support obligation be less than the dependency benefit, the non-custodial parent owes no additional amount, but he is not entitled to a rebate." (Emphasis added.) [18] The district court in this case denied Father's sought-after credit against pre-disability arrearages, but it did so by following the minority rule.

12011–2011
State v. Close green
mont · 1981
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

11992–1992
Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth green
va · 1982
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

11992–1992
State v. Stephens green
nm · 1979
2 sentences

1992However, see State v. Stephens, 93 N.M. 458 , 601 P.2d 428 (1979) compared to State v. Pierce, 110 N.M. 76 , 792 P.2d 408 (1990).

1992However, see State v. Stephens, 93 N.M. 458 , 601 P.2d 428 (1979) compared to State v. Pierce, 110 N.M. 76 , 792 P.2d 408 (1990).

11992–1992
State v. Blackburn green
tenn · 1985
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied — U.S.—, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative interpr

11992–1992
Breaux v. Mays red
oklacivapp · 1987
2 sentences

1992The Oklahoma law provides an interesting perspective where the minority rule settled in Breaux v. Mays, 746 P.2d 708 (Okl.App.1987) was overruled by G.S. v. Ewing, 786 P.2d 65 (Okl.1990) without a single citation in majority or dissent to the preclusive federal law in the PKPA.

1992The Oklahoma law provides an interesting perspective where the minority rule settled in Breaux v. Mays, 746 P.2d 708 (Okl.App.1987) was overruled by G.S. v. Ewing, 786 P.2d 65 (Okl.1990) without a single citation in majority or dissent to the preclusive federal law in the PKPA.

11992–1992
Talancon v. State green
nev · 1986
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

11992–1992
Juan Fallada v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida green
ca11 · 1987
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied — U.S.—, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative interpr

11992–1992
State v. Pierce green
nm · 1990
2 sentences

1992However, see State v. Stephens, 93 N.M. 458 , 601 P.2d 428 (1979) compared to State v. Pierce, 110 N.M. 76 , 792 P.2d 408 (1990).

1992However, see State v. Stephens, 93 N.M. 458 , 601 P.2d 428 (1979) compared to State v. Pierce, 110 N.M. 76 , 792 P.2d 408 (1990).

11992–1992
State v. Bailey green
kan · 1990
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

11992–1992
G.S. v. Ewing green
okla · 1990
2 sentences

1992The Oklahoma law provides an interesting perspective where the minority rule settled in Breaux v. Mays, 746 P.2d 708 (Okl.App.1987) was overruled by G.S. v. Ewing, 786 P.2d 65 (Okl.1990) without a single citation in majority or dissent to the preclusive federal law in the PKPA.

1992The Oklahoma law provides an interesting perspective where the minority rule settled in Breaux v. Mays, 746 P.2d 708 (Okl.App.1987) was overruled by G.S. v. Ewing, 786 P.2d 65 (Okl.1990) without a single citation in majority or dissent to the preclusive federal law in the PKPA.

11992–1992
Lamon v. Rewis green
fladistctapp · 1992
2 sentences

1992For confusion confounded, compare Fuge v. Uiterwyk, 542 So.2d 726 (La.App.1989) with Uiterwyk v. Uiterwyk, 592 So.2d 1156 (Fla. App.1992) and then Lamon v. Rewis, 592 So.2d 1223 (Fla.App.1992).

1992For confusion confounded, compare Fuge v. Uiterwyk, 542 So.2d 726 (La.App.1989) with Uiterwyk v. Uiterwyk, 592 So.2d 1156 (Fla.App.1992) and then Lamon v. Rewis, 592 So.2d 1223 (Fla.App.1992).

11992–1992
Uiterwyk v. Uiterwyk green
fladistctapp · 1992
2 sentences

1992For confusion confounded, compare Fuge v. Uiterwyk, 542 So.2d 726 (La.App.1989) with Uiterwyk v. Uiterwyk, 592 So.2d 1156 (Fla. App.1992) and then Lamon v. Rewis, 592 So.2d 1223 (Fla.App.1992).

1992For confusion confounded, compare Fuge v. Uiterwyk, 542 So.2d 726 (La.App.1989) with Uiterwyk v. Uiterwyk, 592 So.2d 1156 (Fla.App.1992) and then Lamon v. Rewis, 592 So.2d 1223 (Fla.App.1992).

11992–1992
State v. Enmund green
fla · 1985
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied — U.S.—, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative interpr

11992–1992
Riding v. Wainwright green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

11992–1992
Haas v. Hash green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied — U.S.—, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative interpr

11992–1992
Pruitt v. Sullivan green
scotus · 1991
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied — U.S.—, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative interpr

11992–1992
Bailey v. Kansas green
scotus · 1991
2 sentences

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative in

1992It is recognized that a minority rule in a few state courts does exist founded upon the explanation that the felony does not constitute a lesser included offense within the felony murder, Fallada v. Dugger, 819 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir.1987) (Florida law); not a lesser included offense, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); State v. Bailey, 247 Kan. 330 , 799 P.2d 977 (1990), cert. denied — U.S.—, 111 S.Ct. 2022 , 114 L.Ed.2d 108 (1991); determined legislative intent, State v. Close, 191 Mont. 229 , 623 P.2d 940 (1981); Talancon v. State, 102 Nev. 294 , 721 P.2d 764 (1986); legislative interpr

11992–1992
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hamilton green
tenn · 1985
2 sentences

1992Voninski, 661 S.W.2d 872 (where the Tennessee court would not yield to the decree jurisdiction of New York, but then superseded in Hamilton, 688 S.W.2d 821 ).

1992Voninski, 661 S.W.2d 872 (where the Tennessee court would not yield to the decree jurisdiction of New York, but then superseded in Hamilton, 688 S.W.2d 821 ).

11992–1992
Fuge v. Uiterwyk green
lactapp · 1989
2 sentences

1992For confusion confounded, compare Fuge v. Uiterwyk, 542 So.2d 726 (La.App.1989) with Uiterwyk v. Uiterwyk, 592 So.2d 1156 (Fla. App.1992) and then Lamon v. Rewis, 592 So.2d 1223 (Fla.App.1992).

1992For confusion confounded, compare Fuge v. Uiterwyk, 542 So.2d 726 (La.App.1989) with Uiterwyk v. Uiterwyk, 592 So.2d 1156 (Fla.App.1992) and then Lamon v. Rewis, 592 So.2d 1223 (Fla.App.1992).

11992–1992
Harpster v. Benson green
neb · 1984
2 sentences

1989Nebraska also follows the minority rule, Harpster v. Benson, 216 Neb. 776 , 345 N.W.2d 335 (1984).

1989Nebraska also follows the minority rule, Harpster v. Benson, 216 Neb. 776 , 345 N.W.2d 335 (1984).

11989–1989
Semick v. Department of Corrections green
del · 1984
2 sentences

1989Delaware has a controlling statute, Semick v. Department of Corrections, 477 A.2d 707 (Del.Supr.1984), as does West Virginia, Adams v. Circuit Court of Randolph County, 317 S.E.2d 808 (W.Va.1984) and Tennessee, State ex rel.

1989Delaware has a controlling statute, Semick v. Department of Corrections, 477 A.2d 707 (Del.Supr. 1984), as does West Virginia, Adams v. Circuit Court of Randolph County, 317 S.E.2d 808 (W.

11989–1989
Adams v. Circuit Court of Randolph County neutral
wva · 1984
2 sentences

1989Delaware has a controlling statute, Semick v. Department of Corrections, 477 A.2d 707 (Del.Supr.1984), as does West Virginia, Adams v. Circuit Court of Randolph County, 317 S.E.2d 808 (W.Va.1984) and Tennessee, State ex rel.

1989Delaware has a controlling statute, Semick v. Department of Corrections, 477 A.2d 707 (Del.Supr. 1984), as does West Virginia, Adams v. Circuit Court of Randolph County, 317 S.E.2d 808 (W.

11989–1989
Thornburg v. Wiggins green
ind · 1893
2 sentences

1963But 4 Thompson on Real Property, § 1787, p. 75, 1961 Replacement, says “under the majority rule a conveyance to a husband and wife as ‘joint tenants’ creates a joint tenancy, not a tenancy by the en-tireties” (Emphasis supplied.)' (See Thornburg v. Wiggins, 135 Ind. 178 , 34 N.E. 999, 1001 , 22 L.R.A. 42 , 41 Am.St.Rep. 422 ), and that it is the minority rule that a joint tenancy cannot exist between a husband and wife, only a tenancy by the entireties, 4 Thompson, supra, § 1785, at p. 61.

1963But 4 Thompson on Real Property, § 1787, p. 75, 1961 Replacement, says “under the majority rule a conveyance to a husband and wife as ‘joint tenants’ creates a joint tenancy, not a tenancy by the en-tireties” (Emphasis supplied.)' (See Thornburg v. Wiggins, 135 Ind. 178 , 34 N.E. 999, 1001 , 22 L.R.A. 42 , 41 Am.St.Rep. 422 ), and that it is the minority rule that a joint tenancy cannot exist between a husband and wife, only a tenancy by the entireties, 4 Thompson, supra, § 1785, at p. 61.

11963–1963
Freet v. Holdorf green
iowa · 1927
2 sentences

1954Thus it was said in Freet v. Holdorf 205 Iowa 1081 , 216 N.W. 619 , 620: “Plaintiff and the defendant are divorced from each other, and the erstwhile wife cannot now sue the former husband to recover moneys expended by her on behalf of herself or child.

1954Thus it was said in Freet v. Holdorf 205 Iowa 1081 , 216 N.W. 619 , 620: “Plaintiff and the defendant are divorced from each other, and the erstwhile wife cannot now sue the former husband to recover moneys expended by her on behalf of herself or child.

11954–1954
Finch v. Finch green
conn · 1852
1 sentence

1954The legal duty to support children is cast equally upon both parents, and when such duty is performed by the wife she cannot recover therefor in an action against her husband.” The so-called minority rule, too, was held to be the rule in Finch v. Finch, 22 Conn. 411 .

11954–1954

Where else courts name it

WA 44 (1920–2021) CA 41 (1922–2023) VT 33 (1940–2025) TN 30 (1917–2018) TX 28 (1922–2023) VA 25 (1918–2024) OR 25 (1921–2021) OK 24 (1922–2006) AZ 23 (1946–2023) MI 22 (1927–2023) AR 22 (1923–2006) CO 22 (1897–2021) MD 22 (1960–2013) IL 20 (1903–2017) AL 20 (1913–2012) NJ 20 (1950–2009) MO 20 (1928–2018) FL 19 (1943–2015) WV 19 (1910–2023) IA 19 (1926–2018) ID 19 (1932–2019) WI 17 (1928–2017) SD 17 (1918–2015) NY 17 (1934–2010) MT 16 (1917–2023) KS 16 (1904–2017) DE 16 (1950–2026) OH 15 (1923–2015) NM 15 (1916–2000) LA 15 (1933–2019) SC 14 (1932–2025) KY 13 (1923–2021) AK 13 (1979–2024) MS 13 (1930–2019) CT 11 (1924–2025) UT 10 (1924–2008) ME 9 (1956–2022) PA 9 (1942–2015) NC 9 (1945–2009) HI 8 (1961–2025) DC 8 (1970–2015) IN 8 (1947–2000) WY 7 (1954–2019) NE 7 (1961–2002) NH 7 (1930–2009) RI 7 (1970–2013) VI 6 (1986–2016) ND 5 (1954–2011) GA 5 (1933–2003) NV 5 (1921–2007) MA 4 (1959–2006) MN 3 (1985–2011) PR 3 (1947–1955) GU 2 (2023–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check