8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1947–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gibson v. KINCAIDgreen2 sentences1970See the *256 thorough discussion in Gibson v. Kincaid (1967), 140 Ind. App. 186 , 221 N. E. 2d 834 (concurring opinion of Judge Faul-coner). 1970See the *256 thorough discussion in Gibson v. Kincaid (1967), 140 Ind. App. 186 , 221 N. E. 2d 834 (concurring opinion of Judge Faul-coner). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kazmer-Standish Consultants, Inc. v. Schoeffel Instruments Corp.
green
1 sentence2000Kazmer-Standish Consultants, 445 A.2d at 1158 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
American Uniform & Rental Service v. Trainer
green
1 sentence1991The Florida Supreme Court, which abandoned the similar-employment requirement, stated, "If the injury occurring on the part-time job has disabled the employee from working at his full-time job, his capacity as a wage earner is impaired beyond the limits of his part-time job and his compensation should be based on the combined wages." American Uniform & Rental Serv. v. Trainer (Fla.1972), 262 So.2d 193, 194 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Schultz
green
2 sentences1979In State v. Schultz (1976), 71 N.J. 590 , 367 A.2d 423 , a police officer cashed a check written by a traffic offender to the “Municipal Court,” which was endorsed by one “Michael Arnold.” The charge of forgery was dismissed by the trial court because endorsement by “Michael Arnold” of a check made out to the “Municipal Court” did not affect the check’s negotiability. 1979In State v. Schultz (1976), 71 N.J. 590 , 367 A.2d 423 , a police officer cashed a check written by a traffic offender to the “Municipal Court,” which was endorsed by one “Michael Arnold.” The charge of forgery was dismissed by the trial court because endorsement by “Michael Arnold” of a check made out to the “Municipal Court” did not affect the check’s negotiability. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Wabash Printing & Publishing Co. v. Crumrine
green
2 sentences1976The Wabash Printing & Publishing Co. et al. v. Crumrine, (1889) 123 Ind. 89 , 21 N.E. 904 , and cases there cited; The Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R.R. 1976The Wabash Printing & Publishing Co. et al. v. Crumrine, (1889) 123 Ind. 89 , 21 N.E. 904 , and cases there cited; The Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R.R. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Roberts, Board v. State
green
2 sentences1964Roberts v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 185 , 197 N. E. 2d 304 . is foreign to the criminal code of this State and is predicated on a minority rule relied on by other jurisdictions. 1964Roberts v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 185 , 197 N. E. 2d 304 . is foreign to the criminal code of this State and is predicated on a minority rule relied on by other jurisdictions. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Taylor v. Patten
green
1 sentence1955A more recent case upholding the minority rule is Taylor v. Patten (Utah, 1954), 275 P. 2d 696 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Richardson v. Stuesser
green
2 sentences1947Richardson v. Stuesser (1905), 125 Wis. 66 , 103 N. W. 261 ; Roberts v. Whaley (1916), 192 Mich. 133 , 158 N. W. 209 ; but, we feel the better reasoned authorities are in accord with *690 the general fule that a husband is as much under duty to support his wife when she is insane as when she is sane and that there is a husband’s duty to support his wife when she is confined in a public institution according to the husband’s financial ability. 1947Richardson v. Stuesser (1905), 125 Wis. 66 , 103 N. W. 261 ; Roberts v. Whaley (1916), 192 Mich. 133 , 158 N. W. 209 ; but, we feel the better reasoned authorities are in accord with *690 the general fule that a husband is as much under duty to support his wife when she is insane as when she is sane and that there is a husband’s duty to support his wife when she is confined in a public institution according to the husband’s financial ability. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Roberts v. Whaley
green
2 sentences1947Richardson v. Stuesser (1905), 125 Wis. 66 , 103 N. W. 261 ; Roberts v. Whaley (1916), 192 Mich. 133 , 158 N. W. 209 ; but, we feel the better reasoned authorities are in accord with *690 the general fule that a husband is as much under duty to support his wife when she is insane as when she is sane and that there is a husband’s duty to support his wife when she is confined in a public institution according to the husband’s financial ability. 1947Richardson v. Stuesser (1905), 125 Wis. 66 , 103 N. W. 261 ; Roberts v. Whaley (1916), 192 Mich. 133 , 158 N. W. 209 ; but, we feel the better reasoned authorities are in accord with *690 the general fule that a husband is as much under duty to support his wife when she is insane as when she is sane and that there is a husband’s duty to support his wife when she is confined in a public institution according to the husband’s financial ability. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.