minority rule in Illinois

20 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.green mass · 1985 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 2 sentences 1996See West, 317 Ark. at 529 , 879 S.W.2d at 414 (implicitly rejecting the reasoning advanced in Hill); Reaves, 765 F. Supp. at 1290 (repudiating the holding in Odgers and Stephens); McDonald, 394 Mass. at 144 , 475 N.E.2d at 73 (O’Connor, J., dissenting) (observing that "[t]o my knowledge, no other court has embraced the rule laid down today by the court”). 1996See West, 317 Ark. at 529 , 879 S.W.2d at 414 (implicitly rejecting the reasoning advanced in Hill); Reaves, 765 F. Supp. at 1290 (repudiating the holding in Odgers and Stephens); McDonald, 394 Mass. at 144 , 475 N.E.2d at 73 (O’Connor, J., dissenting) (observing that "[t]o my knowledge, no other court has embraced the rule laid down today by the court”).	1	1
Reaves v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.green mied · 1991 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996See West, 317 Ark. at 529 , 879 S.W.2d at 414 (implicitly rejecting the reasoning advanced in Hill); Reaves, 765 F. Supp. at 1290 (repudiating the holding in Odgers and Stephens); McDonald, 394 Mass. at 144 , 475 N.E.2d at 73 (O’Connor, J., dissenting) (observing that "[t]o my knowledge, no other court has embraced the rule laid down today by the court”).	1	1
West v. G.D. Searle & Co.green ark · 1994 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 2 sentences 1996See West, 317 Ark. at 529 , 879 S.W.2d at 414 (implicitly rejecting the reasoning advanced in Hill); Reaves, 765 F. Supp. at 1290 (repudiating the holding in Odgers and Stephens); McDonald, 394 Mass. at 144 , 475 N.E.2d at 73 (O’Connor, J., dissenting) (observing that "[t]o my knowledge, no other court has embraced the rule laid down today by the court”). 1996See West, 317 Ark. at 529 , 879 S.W.2d at 414 (implicitly rejecting the reasoning advanced in Hill); Reaves, 765 F. Supp. at 1290 (repudiating the holding in Odgers and Stephens); McDonald, 394 Mass. at 144 , 475 N.E.2d at 73 (O’Connor, J., dissenting) (observing that "[t]o my knowledge, no other court has embraced the rule laid down today by the court”).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (35)

Case	Cited	Years
People v. Lowery green ill · 1997 2 sentences 2017Id. at 466 . 2017Id. at 466 .	2	2017–2017
Lukaszewicz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. green wied · 1981 1 sentence 1996Wis. 1981), 532 F. Supp. 211 .) However, several of these decisions have been called into question by subsequent rulings and appear to constitute the minority rule.	1	1996–1996
People Ex Rel. Morrison v. Sielaff green ill · 1974 2 sentences 1981Morrison v. Sielaff (1974), 58 Ill. 2d 91, 92 .) Moreover, although several jurisdictions have found that an accused free on bail was entitled to have his habeas corpus petition considered in the same way as if he were held in physical custody, such is the minority rule. 1981Morrison v. Sielaff (1974), 58 Ill.2d 91, 92 .) Moreover, although several jurisdictions have found that an accused free on bail was entitled to have his habeas corpus petition considered in the same way as if he were held in physical custody, such is the minority rule.	1	1981–1981
People v. Strait green ill · 1978 2 sentences 1981In People v. Strait (1978), 72 Ill. 2d 503 , 381 N.E.2d 692 , the court held that an information which showed on its face that the alleged offense was committed beyond the limitations period was defective where it failed to allege facts which would have tolled the period. 1981In People v. Strait (1978), 72 Ill. 2d 503 , 381 N.E.2d 692 , the court held that an information which showed on its face that the alleged offense was committed beyond the limitations period was defective where it failed to allege facts which would have tolled the period.	1	1981–1981
United States v. Anthony J. Demma, United States of America v. Henry Brulay green ca9 · 1975 1 sentence 1979Defendant cites United States v. Demma (9th Cir. 1975), 523 F.2d 981 , where the court adopted the minority rule holding that a defendant may assert entrapment without being required to concede he committed the crime alleged or any of its elements.	1	1979–1979
Sayre v. United States green ohnd · 1967 2 sentences 1973They are either from jurisdictions which adhere to the minority rule, such as In re Elmwood Park Project Section 1, Group B, 376 Mich. 311 , 136 N.W.2d 896 ; from Federal courts in states which adhere to the minority rule such as Foster v. City of Detroit, 254 F. Supp. 655 , arising in the Eastern District of Michigan; Sayre v. United States, 282 F. Supp. 175 , arising in the Northern District of Ohio and Haczela v. City of Bridgeport, 299 F.Supp. 709 , from the United States District Court in Connecticut; or they were decided by the United States Court of Claims, such as R. 1973(Sayre v. United States, 282 F.Supp. 175 .) In addition, the courts of Illinois are not actually bound by decisions of Federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court.	1	1973–1973
In Re Urban Renewal, Elmwood Park Project green mich · 1965 2 sentences 1973They are either from jurisdictions which adhere to the minority rule, such as In re Elmwood Park Project Section 1, Group B, 376 Mich. 311 , 136 N.W.2d 896 ; from Federal courts in states which adhere to the minority rule such as Foster v. City of Detroit, 254 F. Supp. 655 , arising in the Eastern District of Michigan; Sayre v. United States, 282 F. Supp. 175 , arising in the Northern District of Ohio and Haczela v. City of Bridgeport, 299 F.Supp. 709 , from the United States District Court in Connecticut; or they were decided by the United States Court of Claims, such as R. 1973They are either from jurisdictions which adhere to the minority rule, such as In re Elmwood Park Project Section 1, Group B, 376 Mich. 311 , 136 N.W.2d 896 ; from Federal courts in states which adhere to the minority rule such as Foster v. City of Detroit, 254 F. Supp. 655 , arising in the Eastern District of Michigan; Sayre v. United States, 282 F. Supp. 175 , arising in the Northern District of Ohio and Haczela v. City of Bridgeport, 299 F.Supp. 709 , from the United States District Court in Connecticut; or they were decided by the United States Court of Claims, such as R.	1	1973–1973
Hansen v. Collett green nev · 1963 2 sentences 1973Again in Hansen v. Collett (1963), 79 Nev. 159 , 380 P.2d 301 , a malpractice case, the court relies on Ash and concludes: “In support of our adoption of what is referred to as the minority rule’ or ‘the modern rule’ or ‘the more enlightened rule’ we might have justifiably simply rested our conclusion upon the following: ‘We have here two successive torts, the first by Hatch, the second by the doctor. 1973Again in Hansen v. Collett (1963), 79 Nev. 159 , 380 P.2d 301 , a malpractice case, the court relies on Ash and concludes: “In support of our adoption of what is referred to as the minority rule’ or ‘the modern rule’ or ‘the more enlightened rule’ we might have justifiably simply rested our conclusion upon the following: ‘We have here two successive torts, the first by Hatch, the second by the doctor.	1	1973–1973
Foster v. City of Detroit, Michigan green mied · 1966 1 sentence 1973They are either from jurisdictions which adhere to the minority rule, such as In re Elmwood Park Project Section 1, Group B, 376 Mich. 311 , 136 N.W.2d 896 ; from Federal courts in states which adhere to the minority rule such as Foster v. City of Detroit, 254 F. Supp. 655 , arising in the Eastern District of Michigan; Sayre v. United States, 282 F. Supp. 175 , arising in the Northern District of Ohio and Haczela v. City of Bridgeport, 299 F.Supp. 709 , from the United States District Court in Connecticut; or they were decided by the United States Court of Claims, such as R.	1	1973–1973
Haczela v. City of Bridgeport green ctd · 1969 1 sentence 1973They are either from jurisdictions which adhere to the minority rule, such as In re Elmwood Park Project Section 1, Group B, 376 Mich. 311 , 136 N.W.2d 896 ; from Federal courts in states which adhere to the minority rule such as Foster v. City of Detroit, 254 F. Supp. 655 , arising in the Eastern District of Michigan; Sayre v. United States, 282 F. Supp. 175 , arising in the Northern District of Ohio and Haczela v. City of Bridgeport, 299 F.Supp. 709 , from the United States District Court in Connecticut; or they were decided by the United States Court of Claims, such as R.	1	1973–1973
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Certain Underwriters green ill · 1966 1 sentence 1969In New Amsterdam Cas. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, 34 Ill2d 424, 216 NE2d 665 , the Supreme Court was faced with resolving the question of liability between two insurance policies and balancing an “escape” provision from one policy against an “excess” provision in the other.	1	1969–1969
People v. Prosser green ny · 1955 1 sentence 1969Although the court in Bryarly did cite State v. Prosser, 309 N.Y. 353 , 130 N.E.2d 89L, which applied the minority rule allowing defendant to claim a denial of his constitutional right to a speedy trial without requiring his demand for trial, (57 A.L.R.2d at 335) since the Bryarly opinion at page 319 specifically confined its conclusions to the circumstances of the case, we do not regard it as inconsistent with what has become, to an even greater extent, the majority rule.	1	1969–1969
Walter v. Northern Insurance of New York green ill · 1938 1 sentence 1968(Walter v. Northern Insurance Co. of New York, 370 Ill. 283 ; Consumers Sanitary Coffee and Butter Stores v. Commerce Com. ex rel.	1	1968–1968
Benson v. Iowa Bake-Rite Co. green iowa · 1928 2 sentences 1959Benson v. Iowa Bake-Bite Co., 207 Iowa 410 , 221 N. W. 464 ; Marmont v. Axe, 135 Kan. 368 , 10 P.2d 826 ; Anderson v. Andy Darling Pontiac, Inc., 257 Wis. 371 , 43 N.W.2d 362 . 1959Benson v. Iowa Bake-Bite Co., 207 Iowa 410 , 221 N. W. 464 ; Marmont v. Axe, 135 Kan. 368 , 10 P.2d 826 ; Anderson v. Andy Darling Pontiac, Inc., 257 Wis. 371 , 43 N.W.2d 362 .	1	1959–1959
Marmont v. Axe neutral kan · 1932 2 sentences 1959Benson v. Iowa Bake-Bite Co., 207 Iowa 410 , 221 N. W. 464 ; Marmont v. Axe, 135 Kan. 368 , 10 P.2d 826 ; Anderson v. Andy Darling Pontiac, Inc., 257 Wis. 371 , 43 N.W.2d 362 . 1959Benson v. Iowa Bake-Bite Co., 207 Iowa 410 , 221 N. W. 464 ; Marmont v. Axe, 135 Kan. 368 , 10 P.2d 826 ; Anderson v. Andy Darling Pontiac, Inc., 257 Wis. 371 , 43 N.W.2d 362 .	1	1959–1959
Anderson v. Andy Darling Pontiac, Inc. green wis · 1950 2 sentences 1959Benson v. Iowa Bake-Bite Co., 207 Iowa 410 , 221 N. W. 464 ; Marmont v. Axe, 135 Kan. 368 , 10 P.2d 826 ; Anderson v. Andy Darling Pontiac, Inc., 257 Wis. 371 , 43 N.W.2d 362 . 1959Benson v. Iowa Bake-Bite Co., 207 Iowa 410 , 221 N. W. 464 ; Marmont v. Axe, 135 Kan. 368 , 10 P.2d 826 ; Anderson v. Andy Darling Pontiac, Inc., 257 Wis. 371 , 43 N.W.2d 362 .	1	1959–1959
In Re Estate of Tilliski green ill · 1945 2 sentences 1956Although in accord with the so-called minority rule, this view is based upon sound legal principles and is in complete agreement with our decision in In re Estate of Tilliski, 390 Ill. 273 , which held that, under the laws of our State, an adopted child could inherit from his natural parents. 1956Although in accord with the so-called minority rule, this view is based upon sound legal principles and is in complete agreement with our decision in In re Estate of Tilliski, 390 Ill. 273 , which held that, under the laws of our State, an adopted child could inherit from his natural parents.	1	1956–1956
In Re Estate of Sutton neutral minn · 1925 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita	1	1956–1956
In re the Accounting of President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. neutral nysurct · 1954 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956The conclusion which I have reached finds support in the majority of States which have considered this specific question. ( Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W.2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash.2d 681 , 134 Pac.2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres's Estate, 129 N.Y.S.2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton's Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W.2d 859 .) However, I am less conc	1	1956–1956
Segelbaum v. Schanker neutral kan · 1919 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956The conclusion which I have reached finds support in the majority of States which have considered this specific question. ( Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W.2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash.2d 681 , 134 Pac.2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres's Estate, 129 N.Y.S.2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton's Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W.2d 859 .) However, I am less conc	1	1956–1956
Dreyer v. Schrick neutral kan · 1919 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956The conclusion which I have reached finds support in the majority of States which have considered this specific question. ( Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W.2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash.2d 681 , 134 Pac.2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres's Estate, 129 N.Y.S.2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton's Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W.2d 859 .) However, I am less conc	1	1956–1956
Hawkins v. Hawkins neutral ark · 1951 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita	1	1956–1956
Coonradt v. Sailors green tenn · 1948 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita	1	1956–1956
In Re Egley's Estate green wash · 1943 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita	1	1956–1956
Patterson v. Browning neutral ind · 1896 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita	1	1956–1956
Holmes v. Curl neutral iowa · 1920 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956The conclusion which I have reached finds support in the majority of States which have considered this specific question. ( Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W.2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash.2d 681 , 134 Pac.2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres's Estate, 129 N.Y.S.2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton's Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W.2d 859 .) However, I am less conc	1	1956–1956
Villier v. Watson's Administratrix green kyctapp · 1916 2 sentences 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita 1956(Holmes v. Curl, 189 Iowa 246 , 178 N.W. 406 ; Dreyer v. Schrick, 105 Kan. 495 , 185 Pac. 30 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 218 Ark. 423 , 236 S.W. 2d 733 ; In re Estate of Egley, 16 Wash. 2d 681 , 134 Pac. 2d 943 ; Villier v. Watson, 168 Ky. 631 , 182 S.W. 869 ; In re Myres’s Estate, 129 N.Y.S. 2d 531 ; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N.E. 993 ; In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N.W. 925 ; Coonradt v. Sailors, 186 Tenn. 294 , 209 S.W. 2d 859 .) However, I am less concerned by the fact that this court is adopting a minority rule than I am by the fear that this decision engrafts limita	1	1956–1956
Board of Review v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. green okla · 1943	1	1953–1953
Rosenberg v. Chapman National Bank green me · 1927	1	1952–1952
National Hotel Co. v. Merchants' Fire Assurance Corp. of New York green illappct · 1913	1	1945–1945
Dow v. Blake green ill · 1893	1	1940–1940
Cromwell v. Allen neutral illappct · 1909	1	1938–1938
Montag v. Linn neutral ill · 1862	1	1936–1936
Mettler v. Craft neutral · 1891	1	1936–1936
Gamble v. Queens County Water Co. green · 1890	1	1903–1903

Where else courts name it

WA 44 (1920–2021) CA 41 (1922–2023) VT 33 (1940–2025) TN 30 (1917–2018) TX 28 (1922–2023) VA 25 (1918–2024) OR 25 (1921–2021) OK 24 (1922–2006) AZ 23 (1946–2023) MI 22 (1927–2023) AR 22 (1923–2006) CO 22 (1897–2021) MD 22 (1960–2013) IL 20 (1903–2017) AL 20 (1913–2012) NJ 20 (1950–2009) MO 20 (1928–2018) FL 19 (1943–2015) WV 19 (1910–2023) IA 19 (1926–2018) ID 19 (1932–2019) WI 17 (1928–2017) SD 17 (1918–2015) NY 17 (1934–2010) MT 16 (1917–2023) KS 16 (1904–2017) DE 16 (1950–2026) OH 15 (1923–2015) NM 15 (1916–2000) LA 15 (1933–2019) SC 14 (1932–2025) KY 13 (1923–2021) AK 13 (1979–2024) MS 13 (1930–2019) CT 11 (1924–2025) UT 10 (1924–2008) ME 9 (1956–2022) PA 9 (1942–2015) NC 9 (1945–2009) HI 8 (1961–2025) DC 8 (1970–2015) IN 8 (1947–2000) WY 7 (1954–2019) NE 7 (1961–2002) NH 7 (1930–2009) RI 7 (1970–2013) VI 6 (1986–2016) ND 5 (1954–2011) GA 5 (1933–2003) NV 5 (1921–2007) MA 4 (1959–2006) MN 3 (1985–2011) PR 3 (1947–1955) GU 2 (2023–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance

Create a free account

You’re in.

minority rule in Illinois

Followed or applied (3)

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Also cited on this issue (35)

Where else courts name it