Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2023 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bargreen2 sentences2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 | 4 | 5 |
In Re the Suspension of Clarkgreen2 sentences2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 2014ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE [129] This Court considers a recommended disciplinary action according to the following principles: *409 The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain "the integrity of the bar," "to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute" and to "protect the public and the administration of justice." Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper, 2014 WY 22, ¶ 7 , 318 P.8d 790, 798 (Wyo.2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson, 2009 WY 48, ¶ 17 , 205 P.3d 1008, 1015 (Wyo.2009);, In re Clark, 613 P.2d 1218 | 2 | 3 |
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Davidsongreen2 sentences2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 | 2 | 3 |
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Stacy E. Casper, Wsb No. 6-3431green2 sentences2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 2018STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶16] "The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedure are to maintain 'the integrity of the bar,' 'to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute' and to 'protect the public and the administration of justice.' " Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Richard , 2014 WY 98 , ¶ 51, 335 P.3d 1036 , 1051 (Wyo. 2014) (citing Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Casper , 2014 WY 22 , ¶ 7, 318 P.3d 790 , 793 (Wyo. 2014); Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Davidson , 2009 WY 48 , ¶ 17, 205 P.3d 1008 , 1015 (Wyo. 2009) ; In re Clark , 613 P.2d 1218 | 1 | 3 |
Meyer v. Normangreen1 sentence2022As a result, this Court has “the power, the duty, and the corresponding jurisdiction to supervise the conduct of all Wyoming attorneys, each of whom is an officer of the court.” Meyer v. Norman, 780 P.2d 283, 288 (Wyo. 1989). [¶3] “The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedures are to maintain the integrity of the bar, to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute and to protect the public and the administration of justice.” Bd. of Pro. | 1 | 1 |
Graham v. Stategreen1 sentence2020Graham, ¶ 10, 247 P.3d at 875 (“Since the court must exercise a sound judicial discretion in considering a request for dismissal, it must have factual information supporting the recommendation.”); see also Strayer, 846 F.2d at 1265 (“In order to carry out the purposes of the rule, the trial court must be informed of the prosecutor’s reasons for dismissing the indictment and the factual basis for the prosecutor’s decision.” (citing United States v. Derr, 726 F.2d 617, 619 (10th Cir. 1984))). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Jacque Kristina Derrgreen1 sentence2020Graham, ¶ 10, 247 P.3d at 875 (“Since the court must exercise a sound judicial discretion in considering a request for dismissal, it must have factual information supporting the recommendation.”); see also Strayer, 846 F.2d at 1265 (“In order to carry out the purposes of the rule, the trial court must be informed of the prosecutor’s reasons for dismissing the indictment and the factual basis for the prosecutor’s decision.” (citing United States v. Derr, 726 F.2d 617, 619 (10th Cir. 1984))). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Timothy Paul Strayergreen1 sentence2020Graham, ¶ 10, 247 P.3d at 875 (“Since the court must exercise a sound judicial discretion in considering a request for dismissal, it must have factual information supporting the recommendation.”); see also Strayer, 846 F.2d at 1265 (“In order to carry out the purposes of the rule, the trial court must be informed of the prosecutor’s reasons for dismissing the indictment and the factual basis for the prosecutor’s decision.” (citing United States v. Derr, 726 F.2d 617, 619 (10th Cir. 1984))). | 1 | 1 |
Brenda Miller, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Connie Rae Scribnergreen2 sentences2017See Miller v. Beyer, 2014 WY 84, ¶ 76 , 329 P.3d 956, 978 (Wyo. 2014) (identification of physician who might testify at trial without report because physician in question was not an expert retained or employed to provide testimony). [¶38] The court’s order was also consistent with the purposes of the rule. 2017See Miller v. Beyer, 2014 WY 84, ¶ 76 , 329 P.3d 956, 978 (Wyo. 2014) (identification of physician who might testify at trial without report because physician in question was not an expert retained or employed to provide testimony). [¶38] The court’s order was also consistent with the purposes of the rule. | 1 | 1 |
Daniel Avila v. CitiMortgage, Incorporatedgreen1 sentence2016See White, 395 S.W.3d at 716 ; Avila v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 801 F.3d 777, 787 (7th Cir. 2015); Madden Phillips Constr., Inc. v. GGAT Dev. | 1 | 1 |
David White v. Empire Express, Inc. and Empire Transportation, Inc.green1 sentence2016See White, 395 S.W.3d at 716 ; Avila v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 801 F.3d 777, 787 (7th Cir. 2015); Madden Phillips Constr., Inc. v. GGAT Dev. | 1 | 1 |
Stice v. Stategreen1 sentence1995In Stice v. State, 799 P.2d 1204, 1209 (Wyo.1990), the purposes of this rule were said to be: We do not approve of the trial court’s failure to comply with the requirements of the rule and direct strict compliance in the future. | 1 | 1 |
Mitchell v. Forsythgreen2 sentences1993Essentially, qualified immunity confers the entitlement to "immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability." Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2815 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411, 425 (1985). 1993Essentially, qualified immunity confers the entitlement to "immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability." Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2815 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411, 425 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Siegert v. Gilleygreen2 sentences1993In discussing the parameters of qualified immunity, the Supreme Court has said: One of the purposes of immunity, absolute or qualified, is to spare a defendant not only unwarranted liability, but unwarranted demands customarily imposed upon those defending a long drawn out lawsuit. *42 Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. ___ _ ___, 111 S.Ct. 1789, 1793 , 114 L.Ed.2d 277, 287 (1991). 1993In discussing the parameters of qualified immunity, the Supreme Court has said: One of the purposes of immunity, absolute or qualified, is to spare a defendant not only unwarranted liability, but unwarranted demands customarily imposed upon those defending a long drawn out lawsuit. *42 Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. ___ _ ___, 111 S.Ct. 1789, 1793 , 114 L.Ed.2d 277, 287 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Becket Benedict Hinckley, Wsb 6-3434
green
2 sentences2023“The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedures are to maintain the integrity of the bar, to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute and to protect the public and the administration of justice.” Hinckley, 2022 WY 18, ¶ 3 , 503 P.3d at 593 (quoting Bd. of Pro. 2023“The purposes of the state bar disciplinary procedures are to maintain the integrity of the bar, to prevent the transgressions of an individual lawyer from bringing its image into disrepute and to protect the public and the administration of justice.” Hinckley, 2022 WY 18, ¶ 3 , 503 P.3d at 593 (quoting Bd. of Pro. | 3 | 2022–2023 |
Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of Energy
green
2 sentences2014"The exemption thus covers recommendations, draft documents, proposals, suggestions, and other subjective documents ... which would inaccurately reflect or prematurely disclose the views of the agency, suggesting as agency position that which is as yet only a personal position." Coastal States Gas Corp., 617 F.2d at 866 . [142] The Coastal States Gas Corp. court went on to say: To test whether disclosure of a document is likely to adversely affect the purposes of the privilege, courts ask themselves whether the document is so candid or personal in nature that public disclosure is likely in the 2014“The exemption thus covers recommendations, draft documents, proposals, suggestions, and other subjective documents . . . which would inaccurately reflect or prematurely disclose the views of the agency, suggesting as agency position that which is as yet only a personal position.” Coastal States Gas Corp., 617 F.2d at 866 . 16 [¶42] The Coastal States Gas Corp. court went on to say: To test whether disclosure of a document is likely to adversely affect the purposes of the privilege, courts ask themselves whether the document is so candid or personal in nature that public disclosure is likely i | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Tyler R. Kimzey v. Shelby K. Kimzey
green
1 sentence2021Kimzey, ¶ 18, 461 P.3d at 1236 (citing Sharpe, 902 P.2d at 213-14 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Sharpe v. Sharpe
green
1 sentence2021Kimzey, ¶ 18, 461 P.3d at 1236 (citing Sharpe, 902 P.2d at 213-14 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Dayton v. Wyoming National Bank
neutral
1 sentence1975The purpose of this particularity is, of course, to refresh the memory of the witness as to the supposed statement by reminding him of the accompanying circumstances.” McCormick also says on the same page: “The purposes of the requirement are (1) to avoid unfair surprise to the adversary, (2) to save time, as an admission by the witness may make the extrinsic proof unnecessary, and (3) to give the witness, in fairness to him, a chance to explain the discrepancy.” This is not a new rule in Wyoming, being first mentioned in Dayton v. The Wyoming National Bank, 1875, 1 Wyo. 263, 266 , the court s | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.