immunity rule in New Mexico

15 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1941–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Hartman v. Texaco Inc.green nmctapp · 1997 · cited in 2 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2007–2011 2 sentences 2011We disagree also with Petitioner’s characterization of the attorney’s 10 affidavit [RP 69] as conclusory and self-serving. [white clip, MIO/5] Our review of 11 the affidavit provides that the affidavit provides detailed information on the 12 background of the dispute and that the Report was generated to address concerns 13 about the guardian’s fitness and provides that the Report was generated, so that 14 strategic decisions could be made for a case that was in litigation at the time. [RP 69] 15 See Hartman, 1997-NMCA-032, ¶¶ 20-21 (providing that a party may meet its burden 16 to show a docum 2007Providing information pei'tinent to the applicability of the privilege or protection should reduce the need for in camera examination of the documents.”); see also Epstein, supra, at 664 (stating that an index must be adequate to enable the court to determine whether all the elements of the privilege are met); cf. Hartman, 1997-NMCA-032, ¶ 24 , 123 N.M. 220 , 937 P.2d 979 (concluding that the affidavits were insufficient to support the immunity claim because they were “conclusory in form, self-serving, and laek[ed] detailed foundations for their conclusions”). {47} As noted by Travelers, the G	1	2
Maes v. Old Lincoln County Memorial Commissiongreen nm · 1958 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987See Maes v. Old Lincoln County Memorial Commission, 64 N.M. 475 , 330 P.2d 556 (1958); Vigil v. State, 56 N.M. 411 , 244 P.2d 1110 (1952). 1987See Maes v. Old Lincoln County Memorial Commission, 64 N.M. 475 , 330 P.2d 556 (1958); Vigil v. State, 56 N.M. 411 , 244 P.2d 1110 (1952).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (23)

Case	Cited	Years
Wachocki v. Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department green nmctapp · 2009 2 sentences 2016Although the bulk of the analysis focused on whether the brother met his burden to demonstrate the elements of a loss of consortium claim, id. ¶ 54, the Court stated “that damages for loss of consortium may be recovered under the Section 41–4–2(A) waiver of sovereign immunity.” Wachocki, 2010-NMCA-021, ¶ 50 ; see Williams v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of N.M., No. Civ. 13- 0479 JB/WPL, 2014 WL 4351533 , ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, at * n.8 (Aug. 18, 2014) (stating that “[l]oss of consortium can be asserted against New Mexico government actors, despite that it is not specifically mentioned in the [TC 2016Although the bulk ofthe analysis focused on whether the brother met his burden to demonstrate the elements of a loss of consortium claim, id. ¶ 54, the Court stated “that damages for loss of consortium may be recovered under the Section 41-4-2(A) waiver of sovereign immunity.” Wachocki, 2010-NMCA-021, ¶ 50 ; see Williams v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of N.M., No. Civ. 13-0479 JB/WPL, 2014 WL 4351533 , _F. Supp. 3d _, at * n.8 (Aug. 18, 2014) (stating that “[l]oss of consortium can be asserted against New Mexico government actors, despite that it is not specifically mentioned in the [TCA], pro	2	2016–2016
Anchondo v. Corrections Department green nm · 1983 2 sentences 2014Dep’t, 1983-NMSC-051 , ¶¶ 4-8, 100 N.M. 108 , 666 P.2d 1255 (looking to the principal duties of the secretary of corrections and the warden of a county detention center as described by statute to conclude they were not law enforcement officers under the TCA); Baptiste v. City of Las Cruces, 1993-NMCA-017 , ¶¶ 2, 4, 115 N.M. 178 , 848 P.2d 1105 (holding that the written job description alone was insufficient to establish that an animal control officer is a law enforcement officer under the TCA); Vigil, 1992-NMCA-033 , ¶¶ 11-15 (considering the Probation and Parole Act, written job description, 2014Dep’t, 1983-NMSC-051 , ¶¶ 4-8, 100 N.M. 108 , 666 P.2d 1255 (looking to the principal duties of the secretary of corrections and the warden of a county detention center as described by statute to conclude they were not law enforcement officers under the TCA); Baptiste v. City of Las Cruces, 1993-NMCA-017 , ¶¶ 2, 4, 115 N.M. 178 , 848 P.2d 1105 (holding that the written job description alone was insufficient to establish that an animal control officer is a law enforcement officer under the TCA); Vigil, 1992-NMCA-033 , ¶¶ 11-15 (considering the Probation and Parole Act, written job description,	2	2014–2014
Baptiste v. City of Las Cruces green nmctapp · 1993 2 sentences 2014Dep’t, 1983-NMSC-051 , ¶¶ 4-8, 100 N.M. 108 , 666 P.2d 1255 (looking to the principal duties of the secretary of corrections and the warden of a county detention center as described by statute to conclude they were not law enforcement officers under the TCA); Baptiste v. City of Las Cruces, 1993-NMCA-017 , ¶¶ 2, 4, 115 N.M. 178 , 848 P.2d 1105 (holding that the written job description alone was insufficient to establish that an animal control officer is a law enforcement officer under the TCA); Vigil, 1992-NMCA-033 , ¶¶ 11-15 (considering the Probation and Parole Act, written job description, 2014Dep’t, 1983-NMSC-051 , ¶¶ 4-8, 100 N.M. 108 , 666 P.2d 1255 (looking to the principal duties of the secretary of corrections and the warden of a county detention center as described by statute to conclude they were not law enforcement officers under the TCA); Baptiste v. City of Las Cruces, 1993-NMCA-017 , ¶¶ 2, 4, 115 N.M. 178 , 848 P.2d 1105 (holding that the written job description alone was insufficient to establish that an animal control officer is a law enforcement officer under the TCA); Vigil, 1992-NMCA-033 , ¶¶ 11-15 (considering the Probation and Parole Act, written job description,	2	2014–2014
Coyazo v. State green nmctapp · 1995 2 sentences 2014Thus, we must determine the duties upon which the employee spends the majority of his or her time (principal duties) and consider the character of those principal duties “against the admittedly amorphous standard of the duties and activities traditionally performed by law enforcement officers.” Coyazo v. State, 1995-NMCA-056 , ¶ 13, 120 N.M. 47 , 897 P.2d 234 ; see Weinstein, 1996-NMSC-021 , ¶¶ 8, 12. 2014Thus, we must determine the duties upon which the employee spends the majority of his or her time (principal duties) and consider the character of those principal duties “against the admittedly amorphous standard of the duties and activities traditionally performed by law enforcement officers.” Coyazo v. State, 1995-NMCA-056 , ¶ 13, 120 N.M. 47 , 897 P.2d 234 ; see Weinstein, 1996-NMSC-021 , ¶¶ 8, 12.	2	2014–2014
North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. v. Nicholas green colo · 2001 2 sentences 2010Nicholas, 27 P.3d at 838 . {12} Defendants argue that the district court improperly denied summary judgment because it misapprehended and misapplied the immunity standard under the HCQIA. 2010Nicholas, 27 P.3d at 838 . {12} Defendants argue that the district court improperly denied summary judgment because it misapprehended and misapplied the immunity standard under the HCQIA.	2	2010–2010
Lewis v. Clarke green scotus · 2017 2 sentences 2024But Lewis does not instruct courts to stop an immunity inquiry at the caption of the complaint, and in fact, instructs the opposite. 581 U.S. at 161-62 . 2024The Supreme Court in Lewis stated that courts must determine “whether the sovereign is the real party in interest,” by assessing “whether the remedy sought is truly against the sovereign.” Id.	1	2024–2024
Coronel v. Chicago White Sox, Ltd. green illappct · 1992 2 sentences 2009In Coronel v. Chicago White Sox, Ltd., 230 Ill. 2009In Coronel v. Chicago White Sox, Ltd,., 230 Ill.	1	2009–2009
Harlow v. Fitzgerald green scotus · 1982 2 sentences 1998There is some support for this view in the following passage from Harlow, 457 U.S. at 818-19 , 102 S.Ct. at 2738 : If the law was clearly established, the immunity defense ordinarily should fail, since a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct. 1998There is some support for this view in the following passage from Harlow, 457 U.S. at 818-19 , 102 S.Ct. at 2738 : If the law was clearly established, the immunity defense ordinarily should fail, since a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.	1	1998–1998
Vigil v. State neutral nm · 1952 2 sentences 1987See Maes v. Old Lincoln County Memorial Commission, 64 N.M. 475 , 330 P.2d 556 (1958); Vigil v. State, 56 N.M. 411 , 244 P.2d 1110 (1952). 1987See Maes v. Old Lincoln County Memorial Commission, 64 N.M. 475 , 330 P.2d 556 (1958); Vigil v. State, 56 N.M. 411 , 244 P.2d 1110 (1952).	1	1987–1987
Brooks v. Robinson green ind · 1972 1 sentence 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La	1	1975–1975
Mosier v. Carney green mich · 1965 2 sentences 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La	1	1975–1975
Immer v. Risko green nj · 1970 2 sentences 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La	1	1975–1975
Freehe v. Freehe green wash · 1972 2 sentences 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La	1	1975–1975
Klein v. Klein green cal · 1962 2 sentences 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La	1	1975–1975
Taylor v. Bullock green nh · 1971 2 sentences 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La	1	1975–1975
Surratt, Adm'r v. Thompson green va · 1971 2 sentences 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La 1975See, e. g., Maestas v. Overton, supra, (dissenting opinion); Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972); Brooks v. Robinson, 284 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. 1972); Surratt v. Thompson, 212 Va. 191 , 183 S.E.2d 200 (1971); Taylor v. Bullock, 111 N.H 214, 279 A.2d 585 (1971); Immer v. Risko, 56 N.J. 482 , 267 A.2d 481 (1970); Mosier v. Carney, 376 Mich. 532 , 138 N. W.2d 343 (1965); Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal. 2d 692 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 (1962); Annot., 43 A.L.R.2d 632 (1955); 43 A.L.R.2d Later Case Service 332 (1969); Prosser, Law of Torts § 122 (4th ed. 1971); 1 Harper & James, The La	1	1975–1975
Colorado Racing Commission v. Brush Racing Ass'n green colo · 1957 2 sentences 1963Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 1961, 55 Cal.2d 211 , 11 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 359 P.2d 457 ; Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach (Fla.1957), 60 A.L.R.2d . 1193, 96 So.2d 130 ; Anno., 60 A.L.R. 2d 1198 ; Colorado Racing Com’n v. Brush Racing Ass’n, 1957, 136 Colo. 279 , 316 P.2d 582 ; Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass’n, 1953, 43 Wash. 2d 162 , 260 P.2d 765 ; Molitor v. Kane-land Community Unit Dist. 1963Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 1961, 55 Cal.2d 211 , 11 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 359 P.2d 457 ; Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach (Fla.1957), 60 A.L.R.2d . 1193, 96 So.2d 130 ; Anno., 60 A.L.R. 2d 1198 ; Colorado Racing Com’n v. Brush Racing Ass’n, 1957, 136 Colo. 279 , 316 P.2d 582 ; Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass’n, 1953, 43 Wash. 2d 162 , 260 P.2d 765 ; Molitor v. Kane-land Community Unit Dist.	1	1963–1963
Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District red cal · 1961 2 sentences 1963Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 1961, 55 Cal.2d 211 , 11 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 359 P.2d 457 ; Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach (Fla.1957), 60 A.L.R.2d . 1193, 96 So.2d 130 ; Anno., 60 A.L.R. 2d 1198 ; Colorado Racing Com’n v. Brush Racing Ass’n, 1957, 136 Colo. 279 , 316 P.2d 582 ; Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass’n, 1953, 43 Wash. 2d 162 , 260 P.2d 765 ; Molitor v. Kane-land Community Unit Dist. 1963Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 1961, 55 Cal.2d 211 , 11 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 359 P.2d 457 ; Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach (Fla.1957), 60 A.L.R.2d . 1193, 96 So.2d 130 ; Anno., 60 A.L.R. 2d 1198 ; Colorado Racing Com’n v. Brush Racing Ass’n, 1957, 136 Colo. 279 , 316 P.2d 582 ; Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass’n, 1953, 43 Wash. 2d 162 , 260 P.2d 765 ; Molitor v. Kane-land Community Unit Dist.	1	1963–1963
Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'n green wash · 1953 2 sentences 1963Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 1961, 55 Cal.2d 211 , 11 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 359 P.2d 457 ; Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach (Fla.1957), 60 A.L.R.2d . 1193, 96 So.2d 130 ; Anno., 60 A.L.R. 2d 1198 ; Colorado Racing Com’n v. Brush Racing Ass’n, 1957, 136 Colo. 279 , 316 P.2d 582 ; Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass’n, 1953, 43 Wash. 2d 162 , 260 P.2d 765 ; Molitor v. Kane-land Community Unit Dist. 1963Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 1961, 55 Cal.2d 211 , 11 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 359 P.2d 457 ; Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach (Fla.1957), 60 A.L.R.2d . 1193, 96 So.2d 130 ; Anno., 60 A.L.R. 2d 1198 ; Colorado Racing Com’n v. Brush Racing Ass’n, 1957, 136 Colo. 279 , 316 P.2d 582 ; Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass’n, 1953, 43 Wash. 2d 162 , 260 P.2d 765 ; Molitor v. Kane-land Community Unit Dist.	1	1963–1963
Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach red fla · 1957 1 sentence 1963Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 1961, 55 Cal.2d 211 , 11 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 359 P.2d 457 ; Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach (Fla.1957), 60 A.L.R.2d . 1193, 96 So.2d 130 ; Anno., 60 A.L.R. 2d 1198 ; Colorado Racing Com’n v. Brush Racing Ass’n, 1957, 136 Colo. 279 , 316 P.2d 582 ; Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass’n, 1953, 43 Wash. 2d 162 , 260 P.2d 765 ; Molitor v. Kane-land Community Unit Dist.	1	1963–1963
Clallam County v. United States green scotus · 1923 2 sentences 1941Rather, the more recént cases indicate a tendency to restrict more sharply than ever the various exemptions which arise out of the doctrine,” citing Clallam County v. United States, 263 U.S. 341, 344 , 44 S.Ct. 121 , 68 L.Ed. 328 ; Helvering v. Gerhardt, 304 U.S. 405 , 58 S.Ct. 969 , 82 L.Ed. 1427 . 1941Rather, the more recént cases indicate a tendency to restrict more sharply than ever the various exemptions which arise out of the doctrine,” citing Clallam County v. United States, 263 U.S. 341, 344 , 44 S.Ct. 121 , 68 L.Ed. 328 ; Helvering v. Gerhardt, 304 U.S. 405 , 58 S.Ct. 969 , 82 L.Ed. 1427 .	1	1941–1941
Helvering v. Gerhardt green scotus · 1938 2 sentences 1941Rather, the more recént cases indicate a tendency to restrict more sharply than ever the various exemptions which arise out of the doctrine,” citing Clallam County v. United States, 263 U.S. 341, 344 , 44 S.Ct. 121 , 68 L.Ed. 328 ; Helvering v. Gerhardt, 304 U.S. 405 , 58 S.Ct. 969 , 82 L.Ed. 1427 . 1941Rather, the more recént cases indicate a tendency to restrict more sharply than ever the various exemptions which arise out of the doctrine,” citing Clallam County v. United States, 263 U.S. 341, 344 , 44 S.Ct. 121 , 68 L.Ed. 328 ; Helvering v. Gerhardt, 304 U.S. 405 , 58 S.Ct. 969 , 82 L.Ed. 1427 .	1	1941–1941
Unemployment Compensation Com. v. . Ins. Co. green nc · 1939 1 sentence 1941Co., supra, Mr. Justice Clarkson, in a well reasoned opinion written for the majority of a divided court, in pointing out that the term “Federal instrumentality” is not properly applicable to a private corporation, existing primarily for profit but granted certain incidental duties and privileges by the Federal government, observed [ 215 N.C. 479 , 2 S.E.2d 587 ] : “This doctrine of immunity, protecting instrumentalities of either the State or the Federal government from interference at the hands of the other, developed by Marshall * * * to aid the perpetuation of the dual sovereignty establis	1	1941–1941

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NM § N.M. Stat. § 41-4-1 (5) NM § N.M. Stat. § 41-4-5 (5) NM § N.M. Stat. § 41-4-12 (4) NM § N.M. Stat. § 41-4-4 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 181 (1958–2026) PA 136 (1912–2026) OH 96 (1922–2026) IL 70 (1900–2025) NJ 64 (1898–2022) NY 60 (1910–2025) GA 59 (1967–2026) CA 58 (1923–2026) MN 48 (1940–2026) NC 45 (1904–2025) WI 41 (1923–2022) MI 38 (1921–2024) FL 36 (1962–2026) AL 36 (1909–2024) AZ 33 (1888–2023) MD 32 (1979–2022) WV 30 (1949–2025) CO 26 (1963–2026) WA 26 (1934–2024) MA 24 (1917–2021) KY 23 (1916–2026) MO 23 (1908–2025) IN 22 (1964–2016) KS 22 (1933–2022) SC 18 (1952–2026) VA 17 (1956–2022) IA 17 (1939–2020) OR 16 (1955–2016) UT 16 (1916–2019) NM 15 (1941–2024) CT 14 (1955–2021) DC 14 (1960–2025) ID 13 (1966–2025) WY 11 (1965–2012) MS 11 (1936–2024) AR 11 (1973–2025) ME 11 (1989–2026) TN 11 (1931–2024) OK 10 (1915–2022) DE 10 (1960–2025) LA 7 (1955–2025) VT 7 (1981–2019) NV 6 (1966–2015) SD 6 (1982–2026) RI 6 (1978–2009) NH 5 (1985–2016) AK 4 (1967–2009) NE 4 (1967–2017) HI 4 (1939–1981) MT 3 (1991–2008) VI 3 (2016–2017) ND 2 (1965–1983)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check